Re Aathar Ah Kong Andrew: Setting Aside Approval for Voluntary Arrangement Due to Material Irregularities

The Singapore High Court heard applications from CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Citibank Singapore Limited, KGI Securities (Singapore) Pte Ltd, and OUE Lippo Heathcare Limited to set aside the approval for Mr. Aathar Ah Kong Andrew's voluntary arrangement. The court, presided over by Valerie Thean J, revoked the approval due to material irregularities in the conduct of the creditors’ meeting and Mr. Aathar’s lack of disclosure. The court found issues with the nominee's handling of litigation claims, the veracity of Indonesian creditors' claims, an error in admitting a claim by Golden Cliff, and Mr. Aathar's failure to disclose the source of funds for the proposal.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Approval for the voluntary arrangement was revoked, and the court directed that no further creditors’ meeting be held.

1.3 Case Type

Insolvency

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore High Court revokes approval for Mr. Aathar's voluntary arrangement due to material irregularities, including nominee's decisions and lack of disclosure.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Aathar Ah Kong AndrewApplicantIndividualApproval for voluntary arrangement revokedLost
CIMB Securities (Singapore) Pte LtdRespondentCorporationApplication grantedWon
Citibank Singapore LimitedRespondentCorporationApplication grantedWon
KGI Securities (Singapore) Pte LtdRespondentCorporationApplication grantedWon
OUE Lippo Heathcare LimitedRespondentCorporationApplication grantedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Valerie TheanJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Citibank filed a bankruptcy petition against Mr. Aathar on 2 February 2016.
  2. Mr. Aathar proposed a voluntary arrangement to stave off bankruptcy.
  3. The creditors' meeting approved Mr. Aathar's voluntary arrangement.
  4. Four disgruntled creditors applied to set aside the approval.
  5. The nominee did not assign any value to the Litigation Claims for voting purposes.
  6. The bulk of the claims against Mr. Aathar comprised claims by 24 Indonesian creditors.
  7. Mr. Aathar failed to disclose his source of funds for the proposal as required by Rule 68 of the Bankruptcy Rules.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Re Aathar Ah Kong Andrew, , [2018] SGHC 124

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Citibank filed a bankruptcy petition against Mr. Aathar.
Mr. Aathar filed an application for an interim order and a proposal for a voluntary arrangement.
A creditors’ meeting was held.
A creditors’ meeting was held.
The Assistant Registrar granted applications to set aside the approval of the voluntary arrangement.
The appeal against the AR’s decision was withdrawn.
Mr. Aathar applied for another interim order on the basis of a fresh proposal.
Mr. Aathar obtained an interim order in relation to his new proposal.
The nominee notified the creditors of Mr. Aathar’s proposal.
The nominee notified the creditors of Mr. Aathar’s proposal.
The first creditors’ meeting was held.
The nominee provided the creditors present with his adjudication of the debts.
The nominee set out the results of the creditors’ vote via email.
The nominee wrote to creditors, stating that Mr. Aathar’s proposal had met the threshold for approval.
The court granted the order revoking the approval given for the voluntary agreement.
Grounds of decision furnished.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Material Irregularity in Creditors' Meeting
    • Outcome: The court found material irregularities in the conduct of the creditors' meeting, arising from the nominee's decisions and Mr. Aathar's lack of disclosure, and set aside the approval for the voluntary arrangement.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Improper valuation of Litigation Claims
      • Doubtful veracity of Indonesian creditors' claims
      • Material error in admitting Golden Cliff's claim
      • Failure to disclose source of funds
    • Related Cases:
      • [2017] SGHCR 4
      • [2003] EWHC 3543 (Ch)
      • [2003] 3 SLR(R) 629
      • [1996] 2 BCLC 429
      • [2012] 2 SLR 213
      • [1996] 1 All ER 37
      • [1992] BCLC 137
      • [2002] NICh 10

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Revocation of approval for the voluntary arrangement
  2. Declaration that OUELH was not bound by the voluntary arrangement

9. Cause of Actions

  • Application to revoke approval of voluntary arrangement under Section 54 of the Bankruptcy Act

10. Practice Areas

  • Insolvency
  • Bankruptcy
  • Voluntary Arrangement

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Re Aathar Ah Kong AndrewHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHCR 4SingaporeCited for the Assistant Registrar's findings that Mr. Aathar had not been completely forthright and that the nominee had failed to scrutinise Mr. Aathar’s proposal adequately.
Andrew Fender v The Commissioners of Inland RevenueHigh CourtYes[2003] EWHC 3543 (Ch)England and WalesCited for the guiding principles regarding voluntary arrangements, including the debtor's duty of full disclosure and the nominee's duty to exercise independent judgment.
Wah Yuen Electrical Engineering Pte Ltd v Singapore Cables Manufacturers Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2003] 3 SLR(R) 629SingaporeCited for the principle that creditors should be put in possession of such information as is necessary to make a meaningful choice in the context of a scheme of arrangement.
Re a Debtor (No 140 of 1995)High CourtYes[1996] 2 BCLC 429England and WalesCited for elaborating on the duties of the nominee, including the need for independent scrutiny of the debtor's proposal.
The Royal Bank of Scotland NV (formerly known as ABN Amro Bank NV) and others v TT International Ltd and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2012] 2 SLR 213SingaporeCited for the principle that a scheme manager chairing a creditors’ meeting cannot act capriciously or arbitrarily and must determine issues objectively and transparently.
Re Cancol LtdHigh CourtYes[1996] 1 All ER 37England and WalesCited for the position that voluntary arrangements may include and bind creditors of unliquidated debts.
Re a debtor (No 222 of 1990), ex parte the Bank of Ireland and othersHigh CourtYes[1992] BCLC 137England and WalesCited for the principle that for unliquidated claims, a chairman was not expected to make protracted investigation and should simply mark the debt as ‘Doubted’, and otherwise admit it.
Official Receiver v ThompsonHigh Court of Northern IrelandYes[2002] NICh 10Northern IrelandCited for the principle that if the chairman is in doubt about the creditor he should allow the creditor to vote and mark the vote as objected to.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Bankruptcy Rules (Cap 20, R 1, 2006 Rev Ed)
Rule 84(1) of the Bankruptcy Rules
Rule 84(2) of the Bankruptcy Rules
Rule 84(3) of the Bankruptcy Rules
Rule 84(6) of the Bankruptcy Rules
Rule 84(4)-(7) of the Bankruptcy Rules
Rules 68(2)(b) of the Bankruptcy Rules
Rules 68(2)(g) and (h) of the Bankruptcy Rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20)Singapore
Section 54 of the Bankruptcy ActSingapore
Section 45(1) of the Bankruptcy ActSingapore
Section 56 of the Bankruptcy ActSingapore
Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed)Singapore
Section 108 of the Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Voluntary arrangement
  • Material irregularity
  • Creditors' meeting
  • Nominee
  • Litigation Claims
  • Indonesian creditors
  • Golden Cliff
  • Source of funds
  • Bankruptcy Act
  • Bankruptcy Rules

15.2 Keywords

  • Voluntary arrangement
  • Bankruptcy
  • Material irregularity
  • Creditors
  • Singapore
  • Insolvency

17. Areas of Law

Area NameRelevance Score
Bankruptcy90
Insolvency Law90
Voluntary Arrangement85

16. Subjects

  • Insolvency
  • Bankruptcy
  • Voluntary Arrangements
  • Civil Procedure