Mark Cham

Mark Cham is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and insolvency law. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mark Cham has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misrepresentation and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misrepresentation	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Authority	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Leases	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rent	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mark Cham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mark Cham has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	2 cases	50% of cases	Bounty Resources Armenia Ltd v Li Haidong: Default Judgment & Director's Authority(Jul 2015) HSBC Trustee v Lucky Realty: Lease Interpretation & Rent Calculation(Apr 2015)
Aquinas Law Alliance LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction(Mar 2022)
Gurbani & Co LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Re Aathar Ah Kong Andrew: Setting Aside Approval for Voluntary Arrangement Due to Material Irregularities(May 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mark Cham's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.3 parties avg	3.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mark Cham's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction 31 Mar 2022 Peng Yuguo (Defendant)Lost	31 Mar 2022	Peng Yuguo (Defendant): Application dismissedThe 2nd Defendant's application to set aside the Leave Orders and stay the proceedings was dismissed.
2	Re Aathar Ah Kong Andrew: Setting Aside Approval for Voluntary Arrangement Due to Material Irregularities 20 May 2018 Aathar Ah Kong Andrew (Applicant)Lost	20 May 2018	Aathar Ah Kong Andrew (Applicant): Approval for voluntary arrangement revokedApproval for the voluntary arrangement was revoked due to material irregularities. The court directed that no further creditors’ meeting be held. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Bounty Resources Armenia Ltd v Li Haidong: Default Judgment & Director's Authority 20 Jul 2015 Li Haidong (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	20 Jul 2015	Li Haidong (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	HSBC Trustee v Lucky Realty: Lease Interpretation & Rent Calculation 12 Apr 2015 LUCKY REALTY CO PTE LTD (Defendant)Lost	12 Apr 2015	LUCKY REALTY CO PTE LTD (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's argument that the rent should be calculated based only on Block D was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.