Ganesh Paulraj v Avantgarde Shipping: Restoration of Struck-Off Company for Contractual Claim
In Ganesh Paulraj v Avantgarde Shipping Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore heard an application by Ganesh Paulraj to restore A&T Offshore Pte Ltd, a struck-off company, to pursue a contractual claim against Avantgarde Shipping. The court, presided over by Aedit Abdullah J, allowed the application, finding that the applicant had standing, there was practical benefit to the restoration, and no prejudice to the respondent. The respondent has appealed against the decision.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Application Granted
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Application to restore A&T Offshore, a struck-off company, to pursue a contractual claim against Avantgarde Shipping. The court allowed the restoration.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ganesh Paulraj | Applicant | Individual | Application Granted | Won | |
Avantgarde Shipping Pte Ltd | Respondent | Corporation | Application Dismissed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Aedit Abdullah | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- A&T Offshore Pte Ltd was struck off the register in April 2017.
- The Applicant, Ganesh Paulraj, was a director of A&T Offshore.
- A&T Offshore had a potential contractual claim against Avantgarde Shipping Pte Ltd.
- The Applicant's company, Tuff Offshore Engineering Services Pte Ltd, performed work for the Respondent.
- The Applicant had previously agreed to strike off the Company.
- The restoration of the Company is to allow it to commence an action against the Respondents.
5. Formal Citations
- Ganesh Paulraj v Avantgarde Shipping Pte Ltd, Originating Summons 1260 of 2017, [2018] SGHC 140
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Company incorporated | |
Company applied to be struck off the register | |
Company struck off the register | |
Applicant became a director of Tuff | |
Originating Summons filed | |
Hearing date | |
Judgment issued |
7. Legal Issues
- Locus Standi
- Outcome: The court held that the applicant, as a director, had sufficient standing to apply for restoration.
- Category: Procedural
- Practical Benefit of Restoration
- Outcome: The court found that the restoration would allow the company to pursue a contractual claim, which constituted a practical benefit.
- Category: Substantive
- Prejudice to Respondent
- Outcome: The court determined that the respondent would not suffer relevant prejudice from the restoration.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Restoration of Company
- Monetary Damages
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
10. Practice Areas
- Company Law
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Shipping
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Re Asia Petan Organisation Pte Ltd | High Court | Yes | [2018] 3 SLR 435 | Singapore | Cited for the framework for restoration of struck-off companies, including locus standi, practical benefit, and prejudice. |
In re Wood & Martin (Bricklaying Contractors) Ltd | N/A | Yes | [1971] 1 WLR 293 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the interpretation of 'any other person who appears to the court to be interested' in the context of company restoration. |
In re Roehampton Swimming Pool Ltd | N/A | Yes | [1968] 1 WLR 1693 | England and Wales | Differentiated from the present case; cited as an example of an applicant lacking a pecuniary or proprietary interest in the company's restoration. |
Arnold World Trading Pty Ltd v ACN 133 427 335 Pty Limited | Supreme Court of New South Wales | Yes | [2010] NSWSC 1369 | Australia | Discussed in relation to the termination of a creditors’ voluntary winding up and the question of restoration. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) s 344(5) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Restoration of struck-off company
- Locus standi
- Practical benefit
- Prejudice
- Contractual claim
- Director
- Shareholder
- Companies Act
- Person aggrieved
15.2 Keywords
- company
- restoration
- struck off
- contract
- shipping
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Restoration of struck-off company | 85 |
Striking off defunct companies | 80 |
Company Law | 75 |
Business Litigation | 30 |
Bankruptcy | 20 |
16. Subjects
- Company Law