Tan Wen Cheng Adrian

Tan Wen Cheng Adrian is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in proprietary estoppel and intestate succession. Their track record shows a 18.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 19% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated expertise across 68 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntary conveyance to defraud creditors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking off defunct companies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Demurrage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Time for detention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of court proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restoration of struck-off company	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Wen Cheng Adrian has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 16 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
August Law Corporation	16 cases	100% of cases	Marchand Navigation v Olam Global Agri & Sinco Shipping: Lien over Sub-Freights & Arbitration Stay(Nov 2023) Tham Saik Mun Simon v Public Prosecutor: Drink-Driving & Bonjela Gel Defence(Jun 2023) VYQ v VYP: Appeals on Matrimonial Assets, Child Maintenance, and Access(Aug 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Wen Cheng Adrian's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 3 (19%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	102.8 parties avg	2.8	63%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	6%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	19%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	19%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Wen Cheng Adrian's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(59%)	59%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	3(18%)	18%
Won	3(18%)	18%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	723,500.00	65,772.7311 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2021	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Marchand Navigation v Olam Global Agri & Sinco Shipping: Lien over Sub-Freights & Arbitration Stay 28 Nov 2023 Sinco Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	28 Nov 2023	Sinco Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantSinco was ordered to pay costs to Marchand in the amount of $13,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Sinco was ordered to also pay costs to Olam in the amount of $9,000 all in. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tham Saik Mun Simon v Public Prosecutor: Drink-Driving & Bonjela Gel Defence 26 Jun 2023 Tham Saik Mun, Simon (Appellant)Lost	26 Jun 2023	Tham Saik Mun, Simon (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Appellant's appeal against his conviction and sentence for the Drink-Driving Charge was dismissed.
3	VYQ v VYP: Appeals on Matrimonial Assets, Child Maintenance, and Access 22 Aug 2022 VYP (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	22 Aug 2022	VYP (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part regarding the maintenance for the children.
4	Rothstar Group v Leow Quek Shiong: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue and Voluntary Conveyances 20 Mar 2022 Rothstar Group Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	20 Mar 2022	Rothstar Group Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant): Appeal DismissedRothstar's appeals were dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	VYP v VYQ: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child Custody, and Maintenance Dispute 20 Dec 2021 VYP (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Dec 2021	VYP (Plaintiff): Division of matrimonial assetsReceived 45% of the matrimonial assets (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Rothstar Group Ltd v Chee Yoh Chuang: Avoidance of Mortgage as Undervalued Transaction 11 Jul 2021 Rothstar Group Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	11 Jul 2021	Rothstar Group Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Application dismissedOriginating Summons No 78 dismissed. Rothstar was ordered to pay the costs of OS 87 fixed at $12,000 inclusive of disbursements and the costs of OS 89 and OS 78 fixed at $20,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Letchimy v Maha Devi: Proprietary Estoppel & Intestate Succession Dispute over HDB Flat 26 Jan 2021 Letchimy d/o Palanisamy Nadasan Majeed (alias Khadijah Nadasan) (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	26 Jan 2021	Letchimy d/o Palanisamy Nadasan Majeed (alias Khadijah Nadasan) (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $23,000, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Sahara Energy v Chu Said Thong: Breach of Employment Agreements and Video Link Evidence 08 Dec 2020 Sahara Energy Int’l Pte Ltd Singapore (Geneva Branch) (Defendant in Counterclaim)Neutral	08 Dec 2020	Sahara Energy Int’l Pte Ltd Singapore (Geneva Branch) (Defendant in Counterclaim): NeutralThe application by Sahara for video link evidence was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
9	Lim Zhipeng v Seow Suat Thin: Guarantee Enforceability & Consideration in Debt Recovery 07 Sep 2020 Lim Zhipeng (Appellant)Won	07 Sep 2020	Lim Zhipeng (Appellant): Appeal AllowedJudgment entered for the Appellant against the Respondent in the sum of $438,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Letchimy v Maha Devi: Proprietary Estoppel & Intestate Succession Dispute over HDB Flat 28 Jun 2020 Letchimy d/o Palanisamy Nadasan Majeed (alias Khadijah Nadasan) (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jun 2020	Letchimy d/o Palanisamy Nadasan Majeed (alias Khadijah Nadasan) (Plaintiff): Case DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed, and the court ordered costs against the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Ganesh Paulraj v A&T Offshore Pte Ltd: Statutory Derivative Action under Companies Act 30 Jul 2019 Avantgarde Shipping Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	30 Jul 2019	Avantgarde Shipping Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application allowed against respondentApplication to commence a statutory derivative action allowed against the second respondent.
12	Low Heng Leon Andy v Low Kian Beng Lawrence: Proprietary Estoppel and Assessment of Equitable Compensation 14 Aug 2018 Low Heng Leon Andy (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	14 Aug 2018	Low Heng Leon Andy (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedEquitable compensation awarded in the sum of $140,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Ganesh Paulraj v Avantgarde Shipping: Restoration of Struck-Off Company for Contractual Claim 17 Jun 2018 Avantgarde Shipping Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	17 Jun 2018	Avantgarde Shipping Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application DismissedThe respondent's arguments against the restoration of the company were dismissed.
14	Tang Ling Lee v Public Prosecutor: Negligence Causing Grievous Hurt & Sentencing 24 Jan 2018 Tang Ling Lee (Appellant)Lost	24 Jan 2018	Tang Ling Lee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the one-week imprisonment sentence was dismissed.
15	Thu Aung Zaw v Ku Swee Boon: Amendment of Summary Judgment & Legal Capacity of Sole Proprietorship 26 Oct 2017 Ku Swee Boon (trading as Norb Creative Studio) (Respondent)Won	26 Oct 2017	Ku Swee Boon (trading as Norb Creative Studio) (Respondent): Amendment Application AllowedAmendment Application allowed.
16	Low Heng Leon Andy v Low Kian Beng Lawrence: Proprietary Estoppel & Equitable Compensation 15 Aug 2017 Low Heng Leon Andy (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	15 Aug 2017	Low Heng Leon Andy (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partDamages increased to $100,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).