Yip Man Hing Kevin v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct & Adequacy of Sick Leave for Construction Worker

Dr. Kevin Yip Man Hing appealed against the Disciplinary Tribunal's decision finding him guilty of professional misconduct in treating Mr. Zhang Ru Lin, a construction worker, for a fractured clavicle and ribs, by prescribing insufficient sick leave and certifying him fit for light duties too soon. The Singapore Medical Council cross-appealed, arguing for a higher sentence. The High Court dismissed Dr. Yip's appeal and allowed the SMC's appeal, increasing the suspension to eight months, finding Dr. Yip disregarded the patient's welfare.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Dr. Yip's appeal dismissed; Singapore Medical Council's appeal allowed, increasing suspension to eight months.

1.3 Case Type

Regulatory

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding professional misconduct of Dr. Yip for inadequate sick leave to a construction worker. The court dismissed the appeal and increased suspension.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Kevin Yip Man HingAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLostNavin Joseph Lobo, Shaun Oon Kim San, Cheng Liqi, Yap Chun Kai
Singapore Medical CouncilRespondent, AppellantStatutory BoardAppeal AllowedWonChang Man Phing Jenny, Chua Sin Yen Jacqueline, Lim Wan Yu Cheronne

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJudge of AppealYes
Judith PrakashJudge of AppealNo
Quentin LohJudgeNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Navin Joseph LoboBird & Bird ATMD LLP
Shaun Oon Kim SanBird & Bird ATMD LLP
Cheng LiqiBird & Bird ATMD LLP
Yap Chun KaiBird & Bird ATMD LLP
Chang Man Phing JennyWongPartnership LLP
Chua Sin Yen JacquelineWongPartnership LLP
Lim Wan Yu CheronneWongPartnership LLP

4. Facts

  1. Patient, a construction worker, fell from scaffolding and suffered multiple injuries.
  2. Dr. Yip performed surgery on the patient's fractured clavicle.
  3. Dr. Yip gave the patient sick leave for two days and certified him fit for light duties thereafter.
  4. Patient complained of persistent giddiness and chest pain and was hospitalized.
  5. Complaint was lodged with the SMC alleging inadequate sick leave.
  6. Dr. Yip claimed he discussed light duties with the patient, but this was not documented.
  7. The Disciplinary Tribunal found Dr. Yip guilty of professional misconduct.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Yip Man Hing Kevin v Singapore Medical Council and another matter, Originating Summonses Nos 8 and 9 of 2018, [2019] SGHC 102

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Patient fell from scaffolding platform and was brought to the Clinic.
Dr. Yip examined the Patient and recommended surgical treatment.
Dr. Yip performed ORIF surgery on Patient's right clavicle.
Patient was discharged and given sick leave for 7 to 8 July 2011.
Patient certified fit for light duties from 9 to 11 July 2011.
Patient attended first follow-up review.
Patient certified fit for light duties from 12 to 18 July 2011.
Patient attended second follow-up review.
Patient certified fit for light duties from 19 to 25 July 2011.
Patient went to Tan Tock Seng Hospital Emergency Department.
Patient was discharged with hospitalisation leave from 22 to 28 July 2011.
Complaint lodged with the SMC against Dr. Yip.
Dr. Yip was informed about the Complaint by the Investigation Unit of the SMC.
Dr. Yip gave his Explanation to the Complaints Committee.
Dr. Yip was notified by the Complaints Committee that a formal inquiry would be convened.
Notice of Inquiry was issued.
Disciplinary Tribunal delivered its grounds of decision.
Originating Summons No 8 of 2018 was Dr. Yip’s appeal against conviction and sentence.
Originating Summons No 9 of 2018 was the Singapore Medical Council’s appeal against the sentence imposed.
Judgment reserved.
Judgment delivered.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Professional Misconduct
    • Outcome: The court found Dr. Yip guilty of professional misconduct.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to provide adequate sick leave
      • Inappropriate certification for light duties
      • Disregard for patient welfare
  2. Adequacy of Sick Leave
    • Outcome: The court determined that Dr. Yip failed to ensure adequate sick leave was given.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Post-operative care
      • Assessment of patient's condition
      • Consideration of patient's occupation
  3. Sentencing
    • Outcome: The court increased the suspension period from five to eight months.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Aggravating factors
      • Mitigating factors (delay)
      • Parity of sentencing

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against conviction
  2. Appeal against sentence
  3. Increased sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Professional Misconduct

10. Practice Areas

  • Healthcare Regulation
  • Medical Malpractice

11. Industries

  • Healthcare
  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Singapore Medical Council v Wong Him ChoonCourt of AppealYes[2016] 4 SLR 1086SingaporeCited as a key precedent regarding the duties and responsibilities of doctors, particularly concerning patient welfare and perspective.
Low Cze Hong v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2008] 3 SLR(R) 612SingaporeCited for the definition of professional misconduct under the Medical Registration Act, specifically the two limbs of intentional departure from standards and serious negligence.
In the Matter of Dr Sanjay SrinivasanDisciplinary TribunalYes[2017] SMCDT 1SingaporeCited as a sentencing precedent, but distinguished due to the present facts being considered more aggravated.
Ang Pek San Lawrence v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2015] 1 SLR 436SingaporeCited regarding the appropriate degree of respect to be accorded to a Disciplinary Tribunal's decision.
Singapore Medical Council v Mohd Syamsul Alam bin IsmailHigh CourtYes[2019] SGHC 58SingaporeCited regarding the importance of contemporaneous clinical notes and the weight given to recollections without such notes.
Ang Peng Tiam v Singapore Medical Council and another matterHigh CourtYes[2017] 5 SLR 356SingaporeCited regarding the factors to be considered when delay in proceedings is raised as a mitigating factor.
Jen Shek Wei v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2018] 3 SLR 943SingaporeCited as a case where a discount was given in respect of the suspension imposed due to delay.
Tan Kiang Kwang v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[1995] 3 SLR(R) 746SingaporeCited regarding the factors to be considered when delay in proceedings is raised as a mitigating factor.
Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2013] 3 SLR 900SingaporeCited regarding the overarching duty of a doctor and the principles of common humanity.
Low Cze Hong v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2008] 3 SLR(R) 612SingaporeCited regarding the importance of maintaining the highest level of professionalism and ethical conduct in the medical profession.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Medical Registration Act (Cap 174, 2014 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Sick leave
  • Light duties
  • Professional misconduct
  • Disciplinary Tribunal
  • Medical Registration Act
  • Post-operative care
  • Inordinate delay
  • Patient welfare
  • Ethical Code and Guidelines
  • Construction worker

15.2 Keywords

  • Medical negligence
  • Professional ethics
  • Sick leave
  • Construction worker
  • Singapore Medical Council
  • Disciplinary proceedings

16. Subjects

  • Medical Ethics
  • Professional Regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Labour Law

17. Areas of Law

  • Medical Law
  • Professional Misconduct
  • Regulatory Law