Law Society of Singapore v Jaya Anil Kumar: Forgery of Academic Documents & Disciplinary Proceedings
In 2019, the Court of Three Judges in Singapore heard an application by the Law Society of Singapore against Jaya Anil Kumar, who had pleaded guilty to forgery of academic documents. The Law Society sought an order under the Legal Profession Act for Kumar to be dealt with under section 83. The court found due cause was shown and ordered that Jaya Anil Kumar be struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors, citing the gravity and indefensibility of her criminal acts.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
Court of Three Judges1.2 Outcome
Order for striking off granted.
1.3 Case Type
Regulatory
1.4 Judgment Type
Ex Tempore Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The Law Society sought disciplinary action against Jaya Anil Kumar for forging academic documents. The court ordered her to be struck off the roll.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Law Society of Singapore | Applicant | Statutory Board | Application granted | Won | |
Jaya Anil Kumar | Respondent | Individual | Order for striking off granted | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Tay Yong Kwang | Judge of Appeal | Yes |
Belinda Ang Saw Ean | Judge | No |
Quentin Loh | Judge | No |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Jaya Anil Kumar graduated with a law degree from NUS in 2011.
- She pleaded guilty to two charges of forgery of academic documents.
- She submitted a forged Official Transcript to the LSC in January 2013.
- She submitted a forged LLB degree certificate to the LSC in October 2016.
- The degree certificate was altered to show a false class of honors.
- She was fined $5,000 for each charge.
5. Formal Citations
- Law Society of Singapore v Jaya Anil Kumar, Originating Summons No 6 of 2018, [2019] SGHC 12
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Jaya Anil Kumar graduated with a law degree from the National University of Singapore. | |
Jaya Anil Kumar submitted a forged Official Transcript of subject grades to the Legal Service Commission. | |
Jaya Anil Kumar submitted a forged LLB degree certificate to the Legal Service Commission. | |
Jaya Anil Kumar pleaded guilty to two charges involving forgery of academic documents. | |
Court of Three Judges delivered judgment. |
7. Legal Issues
- Forgery of Academic Documents
- Outcome: The court found that the respondent had committed forgery.
- Category: Substantive
- Appropriate Sanction for Misconduct
- Outcome: The court determined that striking off was the only appropriate sanction.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2018] 5 SLR 1068
8. Remedies Sought
- Order for striking off
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Legal Profession Act
10. Practice Areas
- Regulatory Law
- Professional Conduct
11. Industries
- Legal Services
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Law Society of Singapore v Chia Choon Yang | Court of Three Judges | Yes | [2018] 5 SLR 1068 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that misconduct involving dishonesty will almost invariably warrant an order for striking off where the dishonesty reveals a character defect rendering the errant solicitor unsuitable for the profession. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Section 94A(1) Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Forgery
- Academic Documents
- Disciplinary Proceedings
- Striking Off
- Legal Profession Act
- Legal Service Commission
15.2 Keywords
- forgery
- legal profession
- disciplinary
- singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Legal Profession Act | 95 |
Disciplinary Proceedings | 90 |
Forgery | 85 |
Falsification of Documents | 80 |
Professional Misconduct | 75 |
Criminal Law | 60 |
16. Subjects
- Legal Ethics
- Professional Misconduct