PP v Vashan: Drug Importation under Misuse of Drugs Act - Sentencing

In Public Prosecutor v Vashan a/l K Raman, the High Court of Singapore sentenced Vashan to 25 years' imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane for importing not less than 14.99g of diamorphine into Singapore, violating s 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act. Vashan pleaded guilty. The court considered the indicative sentencing range and mitigating factors, including his cooperation with authorities, before arriving at the sentence. The Prosecution sought a sentence of at least 26 years’ imprisonment, with the mandatory 15 strokes of the cane.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Accused sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Vashan was sentenced to 25 years' imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane for importing diamorphine into Singapore, violating the Misuse of Drugs Act.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for ProsecutionWon
Tan Wee Hao of Attorney’s General Chambers
Vashan a/l K RamanDefendantIndividualSentence imposedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Vincent HoongJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Tan Wee HaoAttorney’s General Chambers
Mahadevan LukshumayehLukshumayeh Law Corporation

4. Facts

  1. The accused was promised RM1000 to deliver the packets.
  2. The accused knew the packets contained diamorphine.
  3. The accused hid the packets in his underwear.
  4. The packets contained not less than 14.99g of diamorphine.
  5. The accused cooperated with authorities, providing information for a follow-up operation.
  6. The accused pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Vashan a/l K Raman, Criminal Case No 21 of 2019, [2019] SGHC 151

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accused received packets from "Kash Abang".
Date of accused's remand.
Accused entered Singapore from Malaysia.
Hearing date
Judgment date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Importation of Diamorphine
    • Outcome: The court found the accused guilty of importing diamorphine under s 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2017] 5 SLR 904
  2. Appropriate Sentence for Drug Importation
    • Outcome: The court sentenced the accused to 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane, considering indicative sentencing ranges and mitigating factors.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2017] 5 SLR 904
      • [2017] SGHC 168
      • [2017] SGHC 217
      • [2018] SGHC 97
      • [2017] SGHC 292
      • [2018] 2 SLR 557
      • [2017] 2 SLR 115
      • [2017] 5 SLR 564
      • [2015] 5 SLR 122
      • [2019] 3 SLR 568

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment
  2. Caning

9. Cause of Actions

  • Importation of controlled drugs

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Amin bin Abdullah v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2017] 5 SLR 904SingaporeRelied upon for indicative starting points for sentencing in drug trafficking cases.
Public Prosecutor v Hari Krishnan SelvanHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHC 168SingaporeCited as a sentencing precedent; distinguished based on the offender's higher culpability.
Public Prosecutor v Adri Anton KalangieHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHC 217SingaporeCited as a sentencing precedent; distinguished based on the offender's actions to avoid detection.
Public Prosecutor v Nimalan Ananda Jothi and anotherHigh CourtYes[2018] SGHC 97SingaporeCited as a sentencing precedent; distinguished based on the offender's prior heroin deliveries.
Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Nor Haiqal bin ShamanHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHC 292SingaporeCited by the accused as a case with a lower sentence for a similar offense; distinguished based on the offender's age.
Adri Anton Kalangie v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2018] 2 SLR 557SingaporeCited for the principle that indicative starting sentences should be broadly proportional to the quantity of drugs trafficked or imported.
Suventher Shanmugam v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2017] 2 SLR 115SingaporeCited for the guidelines used to derive indicative sentences in drug trafficking cases.
Public Prosecutor v Tan Lye HengHigh CourtYes[2017] 5 SLR 564SingaporeCited for the approach of calibrating the appropriate indicative starting point based on the weight of the drugs involved.
Vasentha d/o Joseph v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2015] 5 SLR 122SingaporeCited for the non-exhaustive factors to consider when assessing an accused's culpability.
Gan Chai Bee Anne v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2019] SGHC 42SingaporeCited for the reasons a plea of guilt may result in a discount to the aggregate sentence.
Ng Kean Meng Terence v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2017] 2 SLR 449SingaporeCited for the reasons a plea of guilt may result in a discount to the aggregate sentence.
Soh Qiu Xia Katty v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2019] 3 SLR 568SingaporeCited for calibration of the indicative starting point as 28 years’ imprisonment for trafficking offences involving 14.99g of diamorphine.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 7Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 33(1)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Importation
  • Courier
  • Indicative sentencing
  • Mitigating factors
  • Culpability
  • Financial gain
  • Cooperation with authorities

15.2 Keywords

  • drug importation
  • diamorphine
  • misuse of drugs act
  • singapore
  • criminal law
  • sentencing

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Offences
  • Sentencing