Tok Ee Cheng v Jardin Smith International: Powers of Attorney & Agent's Authority in Land Sale Agreements

In Tok Ee Cheng v Jardin Smith International Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore heard an originating summons by the plaintiff, Tok Ee Cheng, seeking a declaration that certain powers of attorney executed by her were null and void. The defendant, Jardin Smith International Pte Ltd, had sold land plots to Tok in the United Kingdom. Lee Seiu Kin J dismissed the application, finding that there was no practical purpose in granting the declaratory relief sought. The court ordered parties to bear their own costs.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Application dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Plaintiff sought declaration that powers of attorney were invalid. The court dismissed the application, finding no practical purpose for the declaration.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
TOK EE CHENGPlaintiffIndividualApplication dismissedLostLiew Tuck Yin David
JARDIN SMITH INTERNATIONAL PTE LTDDefendantCorporationApplication dismissedWonChoo Ching Yeow Collin, Goh Guan Hui Felix

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lee Seiu KinJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Liew Tuck Yin DavidDavid Liew Law Practice
Choo Ching Yeow CollinTan Peng Chin LLC
Goh Guan Hui FelixTan Peng Chin LLC

4. Facts

  1. Tok purchased 14 plots of land in the United Kingdom through 11 sale and purchase agreements.
  2. The purchases were made from Jardin for investment purposes.
  3. Jardin subdivides land into plots and sells them as investments.
  4. Buyers appoint Jardin as the managing agent to develop the land.
  5. Tok executed powers of attorney (POAs) in favor of Jardin.
  6. The POAs were for use in Singapore and the United Kingdom.
  7. The execution of the POAs was not witnessed by someone physically present when Tok signed them.
  8. Tok complained about fraud and mismanagement after plans for a rail development involving compulsory acquisition of her plots were announced.
  9. Tok alleged material misrepresentations by Jardin about the POAs.
  10. Tok claimed she never intended to confer authority on Jardin to negotiate on her behalf regarding the compulsory acquisition.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Tok Ee Cheng v Jardin Smith International Pte Ltd, Originating Summons No 1190 of 2019, [2020] SGHC 111

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Sale and Purchase Agreement signed
Sale and Purchase Agreement signed
Sale and Purchase Agreement signed
Sale and Purchase Agreement signed
Sale and Purchase Agreement signed
Plans for rail development in the UK announced
Sale and Purchase Agreement signed
Sale and Purchase Agreement signed
Sale and Purchase Agreement signed
Sale and Purchase Agreement signed
Sale and Purchase Agreement signed
Sale and Purchase Agreement signed
Hearing held
Application dismissed
Appeal filed
Grounds for decision given

7. Legal Issues

  1. Validity of Powers of Attorney
    • Outcome: The court found that there was no practical purpose in granting a declaration on the validity of the powers of attorney and dismissed the application.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Procedural irregularities in execution
      • Attestation requirements
      • Registration requirements
      • Witnessing requirements
  2. Declaratory Relief
    • Outcome: The court held that there was no useful or practical purpose for granting the declaratory relief sought and dismissed the application.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Practical purpose of relief
      • Determination of legal controversies
      • Answering abstract or hypothetical questions
    • Related Cases:
      • [1999] SGHC 302
      • [2000] 2 SLR(R) 30
      • [1996] 2 SLR(R) 80
      • (1992) 66 ALJR 271
      • [2015] 3 SLR 620

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Declaratory Judgment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Declaration of Invalidity
  • Breach of Contract
  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Real Estate
  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Scott Latham v Credit Suisse First BostonHigh CourtYes[1999] SGHC 302SingaporeCited for the principle that courts consider whether there is any useful or practical purpose for granting declaratory relief.
Latham Scott v Credit Suisse First BostonCourt of AppealYes[2000] 2 SLR(R) 30SingaporeCited for affirming the principle that courts consider whether there is any useful or practical purpose for granting declaratory relief.
Salijah bte Ab Latef v Mohd Irwan bin Abdullah TeoUnknownYes[1996] 2 SLR(R) 80SingaporeCited for the principle that declaratory relief must be directed to the determination of legal controversies and not to answering abstract or hypothetical questions.
Ainsworth v Criminal Justice CommissionUnknownYes(1992) 66 ALJR 271AustraliaCited for the principle that declaratory relief must be directed to the determination of legal controversies and not to answering abstract or hypothetical questions.
Diora Ace Ltd and others v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3661 and anotherUnknownYes[2015] 3 SLR 620SingaporeCited for the principle that a declaration would not have granted any “relief” in a real sense.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Order 92, Rule 4 of the Rules of Court

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Sections 16 and 18 and Schedule 1 of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322)Singapore
Section 48 of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act (Cap 61)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Powers of Attorney
  • Sale and Purchase Agreements
  • Managing Agent
  • Compulsory Acquisition
  • Declaratory Relief
  • Procedural Irregularities
  • Investment Purposes

15.2 Keywords

  • Powers of attorney
  • Agency
  • Land sale
  • Declaratory relief
  • Singapore
  • High Court
  • Investment
  • Property
  • Real estate

16. Subjects

  • Agency Law
  • Construction of Agent’s Authority
  • Powers of Attorney
  • Administrative Law
  • Remedies
  • Declarations

17. Areas of Law

  • Agency
  • Administrative Law
  • Declarations
  • Construction Law
  • Contract Law