Liew Tuck Yin David

Liew Tuck Yin David is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and maintenance. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and contracts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Spousal Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Transaction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Liew Tuck Yin David has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Liew Tuck Yin David has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
David Liew Law Practice	4 cases	67% of cases	WTU v WTV: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child & Spousal Maintenance(Jan 2025) Ng Shu Yi v. Tan Yew Wei: Bankruptcy Application Dismissed Due to Debt Below Statutory Threshold(Aug 2021) USD v USC: Appeal on Division of Matrimonial Assets, Spousal and Child Maintenance, Care and Control and Access to Children(Feb 2021)
LawHub LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	TCT v TCU: Interim Maintenance Under Women's Charter - Proof of Failure to Provide Reasonable Maintenance(May 2015)
DSH Law Corporation	1 cases	17% of cases	Leong Soh Har Michael v Kek Beng: Collective Sale Cost Allocation Dispute(Jan 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Liew Tuck Yin David's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 15.9
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	516.6 parties avg	16.6	83%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	120.0 parties avg	20.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Liew Tuck Yin David's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,500.00	1,300.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WTU v WTV: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child & Spousal Maintenance 26 Jan 2025 WTU (Appellant)Lost	26 Jan 2025	WTU (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in its entirety.
2	Ng Shu Yi v. Tan Yew Wei: Bankruptcy Application Dismissed Due to Debt Below Statutory Threshold 01 Aug 2021 Tan Yew Wei (Defendant)Won	01 Aug 2021	Tan Yew Wei (Defendant): Objections SustainedDefendant's objections to the Bankruptcy Application were sustained; awarded costs of $1,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	USD v USC: Appeal on Division of Matrimonial Assets, Spousal and Child Maintenance, Care and Control and Access to Children 28 Feb 2021 USD (Appellant)Lost	28 Feb 2021	USD (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe husband's appeal against the ancillary orders was dismissed.
4	Tok Ee Cheng v Jardin Smith International: Powers of Attorney & Agent's Authority in Land Sale Agreements 25 May 2020 TOK EE CHENG (Plaintiff)Lost	25 May 2020	TOK EE CHENG (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for a declaration was dismissed; parties to bear their own costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	TCT v TCU: Interim Maintenance Under Women's Charter - Proof of Failure to Provide Reasonable Maintenance 21 May 2015 TCU (Respondent)Lost	21 May 2015	TCU (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Judge’s orders for interim maintenance for the Son and the Wife were set aside. Costs of the appeal, and of the hearing below, were fixed at $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Leong Soh Har Michael v Kek Beng: Collective Sale Cost Allocation Dispute 12 Jan 2009 Koh Thong Mui (Defendant)Lost	12 Jan 2009	Koh Thong Mui (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.