Raman Dhir v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374: Strata Titles, Common Property Dispute
Mr. Raman Dhir, the appellant, appealed against the Strata Titles Board's decision dismissing his application against the Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374, the respondent, concerning water leakages originating from common property. The High Court, presided over by Justice Chan Seng Onn, allowed the appeal, holding that the reinforced concrete flat roof and the skylight are common property under the Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act. The court remitted the matter to the STB for rehearing, directing it to apply the statutory presumption under s 101(8) of the BMSMA.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court of the Republic of Singapore1.2 Outcome
Appeal Allowed
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal regarding whether a roof and skylight are common property under the BMSMA. The court allowed the appeal, finding the roof and skylight are common property.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raman Dhir | Appellant | Individual | Appeal Allowed | Won | |
Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374 | Respondent | Corporation | Appeal Dismissed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Chan Seng Onn | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Mr. Dhir owns a townhouse unit in The Balmoral.
- Water leakages occurred within Mr. Dhir's unit.
- The leakages originated from the RC flat roof, windows, and skylight.
- Mr. Dhir claimed the RC flat roof and skylight were common property.
- The MCST argued the RC flat roof and skylight were not common property.
- The STB found the RC flat roof and skylight were not common property.
- The STB found the windows were common property.
- The usable area on the RC flat roof was not part of the total strata area of the Unit.
5. Formal Citations
- Raman Dhir v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374, Tribunal Appeal No 15 of 2019, [2020] SGHC 19
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Hearing date | |
Judgment reserved | |
Proceedings instituted |
7. Legal Issues
- Definition of Common Property
- Outcome: The court held that the RC flat roof and skylight satisfy the definition of common property under s 2(1) of the BMSMA.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Exclusive use vs. capable of being used or enjoyed
- Part and parcel of the fabric of the building
- Strata area delineation
- Statutory Presumption under s 101(8) BMSMA
- Outcome: The court held that the STB failed to apply the statutory presumption under s 101(8) of the BMSMA and remitted the matter for rehearing.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Reversal of burden of proof
- Evidence of dampness, moisture, or water penetration
- Appeal on a Point of Law
- Outcome: The court held that both the Common Property Appeal and the Statutory Presumption Appeal raise points of law within the meaning of s 98(1) of the BMSMA.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Ex facie error of law
- Misinterpretation of statute
- Misdirection as to burden of proof
8. Remedies Sought
- Damages
- Disbursements
- Declaration that the RC flat roof and skylight are common property
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Statutory Duty
- Negligence
10. Practice Areas
- Strata Management Disputes
- Real Estate Litigation
11. Industries
- Real Estate
- Construction
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sit Kwong Lam v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No. 2645 | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2018] 1 SLR 790 | Singapore | Cited for the interpretation of 'common property' under s 2(1) of the Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act, emphasizing that both limbs of the definition must be satisfied conjunctively. |
Ng Eng Ghee & Ors v Mamata Kapildev Dave & Ors (Horizon Partners Pte Ltd, intervener) & another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2009] 3 SLR(R) 109 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that ex facie errors of law raise points of law subject to appeal under s 98(1) of the BMSMA, including misinterpretation of a statute or misdirection as to the burden of proof. |
Wu Chiu Lin v MCST Plan No 2874 | N/A | Yes | [2018] 4 SLR 966 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the physical location of disputed property within the boundaries of a unit does not automatically mean it is comprised in the unit. |
Dynamic Investments Pte Ltd v Lee Chee Kian Silas | N/A | Yes | [2008] 1 SLR(R) 729 | Singapore | Cited regarding ex facie errors of law. |
Liu Chee Ming v Loo-Lim Shirley | N/A | Yes | [2008] 2 SLR(R) 765 | Singapore | Cited regarding ex facie errors of law. |
Liew Soon Fook Michael and another v Yi Kai Development Pte Ltd | High Court | Yes | [2017] SGHC 88 | Singapore | Cited regarding the inclusion of a roof within the computation of a cluster house’s strata area means that the roof is not common property, and that the owner has exclusive ownership of the roof. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
Land Surveyors Rules 1976 (S 143/1976) |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act (Cap 30C, 2008 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act (Cap 30C, 2008 Rev Ed) s 2(1) | Singapore |
Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act (Cap 30C, 2008 Rev Ed) s 2(9) | Singapore |
Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act (Cap 30C, 2008 Rev Ed) s 101(8) | Singapore |
Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act s 98(1) | Singapore |
Land Titles (Strata) Act (Cap. 158) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Common Property
- Strata Title
- Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act
- Reinforced Concrete Flat Roof
- Skylight
- Statutory Presumption
- Strata Titles Board
- Exclusive Use
- Strata Area
- Ex Facie Error of Law
15.2 Keywords
- strata title
- common property
- BMSMA
- water leakage
- management corporation
- Singapore
- appeal
- property law
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Strata Title Law | 95 |
Property Law | 60 |
Construction Law | 10 |
Administrative Law | 5 |
16. Subjects
- Strata Management
- Property Rights
- Civil Appeals