Leong De Shun Kevin

Leong De Shun Kevin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and strata title law. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Leong De Shun Kevin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Leong De Shun Kevin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan & Au LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Lew Huey Jiun v Lee Yu Ru: Appeal of STB Decision on Water Leakage & Rental Loss(Jan 2025) Tan Beng Hui Carolyn v Law Society of Singapore: Appeal on Professional Misconduct Penalty(Feb 2023) Png Hock Leng v AXA Insurance: Transfer of Case from State Courts to High Court(Oct 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Leong De Shun Kevin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	80%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Leong De Shun Kevin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	7,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lew Huey Jiun v Lee Yu Ru: Appeal of STB Decision on Water Leakage & Rental Loss 07 Jan 2025 Ong Pang Liang (Claimant)Lost	07 Jan 2025	Ong Pang Liang (Claimant): Application for extension of time dismissedThe Claimants' application for an extension of time to file an appeal was dismissed.
2	Tan Beng Hui Carolyn v Law Society of Singapore: Appeal on Professional Misconduct Penalty 21 Feb 2023 Tan Beng Hui Carolyn (Appellant)Lost	21 Feb 2023	Tan Beng Hui Carolyn (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Respondent, fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Png Hock Leng v AXA Insurance: Transfer of Case from State Courts to High Court 12 Oct 2021 Png Hock Leng (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	12 Oct 2021	Png Hock Leng (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to dismiss the application to transfer the case was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Raman Dhir v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374: Appeal on Leave Requirement for Cross-Claim 15 Sep 2021 Raman Dhir (Appellant)Lost	15 Sep 2021	Raman Dhir (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed without prejudice to the appellant’s right to pursue the cross-claim. Costs awarded to the respondent fixed at $5,000 plus disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Raman Dhir v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 1374: Strata Titles, Common Property Dispute 22 Jan 2020 Raman Dhir (Appellant)Won	22 Jan 2020	Raman Dhir (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the reinforced concrete flat roof and the skylight are deemed common property. The matter is remitted to the STB for rehearing. Costs of the appeal fixed at $5,000 plus reasonable disbursements. The costs below of $18,000 including disbursements that the STB awarded to the MCST is set aside. The STB will decide both the costs (including disbursements) for the first hearing and the re-hearing together. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.