Tan You Cheng v Ng Kok Hin: Negligence and Contributory Negligence on the PIE Expressway

In Tan You Cheng v Ng Kok Hin, the High Court of Singapore addressed a negligence claim arising from a traffic accident on the Pan Island Expressway (PIE). The plaintiff, Tan You Cheng, sued the defendant, Ng Kok Hin, for negligence after Ng Kok Hin's car collided with him. The incident occurred after Tan You Cheng stopped his lorry on the expressway to retrieve fallen goods. The court found both parties liable, apportioning 80% liability to Tan You Cheng and 20% liability to Ng Kok Hin, citing contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff; liability apportioned 80% to Plaintiff and 20% to Defendant.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Plaintiff sued Defendant for negligence after being hit by Defendant's car on the PIE. The court found both parties liable, apportioning 80% liability to Plaintiff and 20% to Defendant.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Tan You ChengPlaintiffIndividualJudgment for PlaintiffPartialA Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai
Ng Kok HinDefendantIndividualPartial LiabilityPartialYeo Kim Hai Patrick, Lim Hui Ying

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Andre ManiamJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
A Revi Shanker s/o K AnnamalaiARShanker Law Chambers
Yeo Kim Hai PatrickLegal Solutions LLC
Lim Hui YingLegal Solutions LLC

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff stopped his lorry on the PIE after goods fell off.
  2. Plaintiff failed to secure the goods properly before the journey.
  3. Plaintiff left the lorry stationary in lane 3 for 15-30 minutes.
  4. Plaintiff did not put up a warning sign to alert oncoming traffic.
  5. Plaintiff was standing in lane 2, in the shadow of the lorry, when hit.
  6. Defendant admitted to being sleepy while driving.
  7. Defendant pleaded guilty to driving without due care and attention.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Tan You Cheng v Ng Kok Hin, Suit No 976 of 2018, [2020] SGHC 237

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accident occurred on the Pan Island Expressway (PIE).
Suit No 976 of 2018 filed.
Trial began.
Trial continued.
Trial continued.
Plaintiff’s written submissions dated.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found the defendant negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to keep a proper lookout
      • Driving without due care and attention
  2. Contributory Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found the plaintiff contributorily negligent for stopping his lorry on the expressway and failing to take adequate safety precautions.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Stopping vehicle on expressway
      • Failure to secure load
      • Obstructing traffic
      • Standing in a dangerous position

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents

11. Industries

  • Transportation

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Yang Xi Na v Lim Chong Hong and another (Ong Ah Seng, third party)High CourtYes[2006] 3 SLR(R) 459SingaporeCited as a precedent for apportioning liability in cases involving collisions with stationary vehicles.
Dymond v Pearce and othersCourt of AppealYes[1972] 1 QB 496England and WalesCited as a case where the accident was found to be wholly attributable to the negligence of the motorcyclist who collided into a parked lorry.
Chop Seng Heng v Thevannasan and othersPrivy CouncilYes[1975] 2 MLJ 3MalaysiaCited as a case where a moving lorry collided into a stationary lorry, and the Privy Council restored the trial judge's finding of apportioned liability.
Chan Loo Khee v Lai Siew San and othersN/AYes[1971] 1 MLJ 253MalaysiaCited for the principle of proper apportionment of blame in cases of obstruction causing accidents.
Lim Kar Bee v Abdul Latif Bin IsmailFederal CourtYes[1978] 1 MLJ 109MalaysiaCited as a case where a motorcyclist collided into steel pipes left on the side of the road.
Ong Bee Nah v Won Siew Wan (Yong Tian Choy, third party)N/AYes[2005] 2 SLR(R) 455SingaporeCited as a case concerning an offence of driving without due care or consideration, where the court examined the reasons behind a party deciding to admit to an offence.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Road Traffic Act (Cap 276, 2004 Rev Ed) s 65(a)Singapore
Road Traffic Rules (Cap 276, R 20, 1999 Rev Ed) Rule 18Singapore
Road Traffic (Expressway Traffic) Rules (Cap 276, R 23, 1990 Rev Ed) Rule 6Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Expressway
  • Contributory negligence
  • Stationary vehicle
  • Due care and attention
  • Proper lookout
  • Road Traffic Rules
  • Road Traffic Act

15.2 Keywords

  • Negligence
  • Contributory negligence
  • Road accident
  • Expressway
  • Singapore
  • Traffic law

16. Subjects

  • Tort Law
  • Road Accidents
  • Civil Litigation

17. Areas of Law

  • Tort
  • Negligence
  • Contributory Negligence