A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai

A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 8.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	11 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	9 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	9 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	8 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
ARShanker Law Chambers	8 cases	67% of cases	Mohamed Faizel Ahmed v Public Prosecutor: Drug Consumption, Possession, and Appeal(Oct 2023) WHB v WHA: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Indirect Contributions, and Jewellery Dispute in Divorce(Apr 2023) A Steven s/o Paul Raj v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction Based on Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2023)
AR Shanker Law Chambers	2 cases	17% of cases	PP v Arun Ramesh Kumar: Trafficking, Possession, Misuse of Drugs Act(Jul 2021) Public Prosecutor v Shanmugam: Importation of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2017)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	8% of cases	PP v Zainudin & Shanti: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act (MDA)(Nov 2016)
ARShanker Law Chambers, Regent Law LLC	1 cases	8% of cases	Public Prosecutor v BND: Rape Conviction Based on DNA Evidence and Unusually Convincing Testimony(Feb 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	92.4 parties avg	2.4	75%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	17%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of A Revi Shanker s/o K Annamalai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(75%)	75%
Partial	2(17%)	17%
Won	1(8%)	8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohamed Faizel Ahmed v Public Prosecutor: Drug Consumption, Possession, and Appeal 02 Oct 2023 Mohamed Faizel Ahmed (Appellant)Lost	02 Oct 2023	Mohamed Faizel Ahmed (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction was dismissed.
2	WHB v WHA: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Indirect Contributions, and Jewellery Dispute in Divorce 10 Apr 2023 WHA (Respondent)Won	10 Apr 2023	WHA (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe Husband successfully defended against the Wife's appeal, with the court dismissing her claims.
3	A Steven s/o Paul Raj v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction Based on Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Feb 2023 A Steven s/o Paul Raj (Applicant)Lost	27 Feb 2023	A Steven s/o Paul Raj (Applicant): Criminal motion dismissed summarilyThe application for permission to make a review application was dismissed.
4	Public Prosecutor v Sri Tharean Muthalagan: Trafficking Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Apr 2022 Sri Tharean Muthalagan (Defendant)Lost	28 Apr 2022	Sri Tharean Muthalagan (Defendant): ConvictionAccused convicted of possessing methamphetamine for the purpose of trafficking.
5	PP v Arun Ramesh Kumar: Trafficking, Possession, Misuse of Drugs Act 06 Jul 2021 Arun Ramesh Kumar (Defendant)Lost	06 Jul 2021	Arun Ramesh Kumar (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe accused was found guilty on both charges of possession of controlled drugs for the purpose of trafficking.
6	PP v Dzulkarnain: Trafficking in Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Feb 2021 Sanjay Krishnan (Defendant)Lost	24 Feb 2021	Sanjay Krishnan (Defendant): ConvictedSanjay was convicted of possession of cannabis for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to the mandatory death sentence.
7	Tan You Cheng v Ng Kok Hin: Negligence and Contributory Negligence on the PIE Expressway 12 Nov 2020 Tan You Cheng (Plaintiff)Partial	12 Nov 2020	Tan You Cheng (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Plaintiff; liability apportioned 80% to Plaintiff and 20% to Defendant. Monetary amount is 0.00 as quantum to be determined at a later stage. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	PP v Chandroo Subramaniam: Trafficking Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act 30 Sep 2020 Kamalnathan a/l Muniandy (Defendant)Lost	30 Sep 2020	Kamalnathan a/l Muniandy (Defendant): ConvictedKamalnathan a/l Muniandy was convicted of the charge he faces.
9	Public Prosecutor v BND: Rape Conviction Based on DNA Evidence and Unusually Convincing Testimony 27 Feb 2019 BND (Defendant)Lost	27 Feb 2019	BND (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted of both charges and sentenced to 26 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
10	PP v Ramesh & Chander: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Nov 2017 Ramesh A/L Perumal (Defendant)Lost	13 Nov 2017	Ramesh A/L Perumal (Defendant): GuiltyFound guilty of possessing diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
11	Public Prosecutor v Shanmugam: Importation of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 14 May 2017 Shanmugam A/L Applanaidu (Defense)Lost	14 May 2017	Shanmugam A/L Applanaidu (Defense): Guilty as chargedThe accused was found guilty of importing cannabis and cannabis mixture.
12	PP v Zainudin & Shanti: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act (MDA) 01 Nov 2016 Shanti Krishnan (Defendant)Partial	01 Nov 2016	Shanti Krishnan (Defendant): GuiltyShanti was found guilty of drug trafficking but was spared the death penalty and sentenced to life imprisonment due to providing substantive assistance to CNB.