UUV v UUU: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child Maintenance, and Spousal Maintenance in Divorce

In the Family Justice Courts of Singapore, the appeal of UUV (Husband) against the decision of the District Judge in the Ancillary Matters hearing of his divorce from UUU (Wife) was partially allowed. The appeal concerned care and control of the children, maintenance of the children, maintenance of the wife, and the division of the matrimonial home. The court varied the access order for the Husband, reduced the amount of child maintenance, rescinded spousal maintenance, and adjusted the division ratio of the flat.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Family Justice Courts of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal allowed in part.

1.3 Case Type

Family

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal concerning division of matrimonial assets, child maintenance, and spousal maintenance. The court varied access and maintenance orders.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
UUVAppellant, DefendantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial
UUURespondent, PlaintiffIndividualAppeal dismissed in partLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tan Puay BoonJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Parties married on 23 October 2010 and have two children.
  2. Wife filed for divorce on 20 July 2017.
  3. Interim Judgment was granted on 9 January 2018.
  4. Husband appealed against the Ancillary Matters Order.
  5. Care and control of the Children was granted to the Wife.
  6. Husband was to pay $800.00 per month for maintenance of the Children.
  7. Flat was to be divided in a 55:45 ratio between the Wife and the Husband.

5. Formal Citations

  1. UUV v UUU, High Court — District Court Appeal from the Family Courts No 150 of 2018, [2020] SGHCF 7

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Parties married in Singapore
First child born
Parties moved to a rented flat in Ang Mo Kio
Second child born
Flat in Yishun purchased in parties’ joint names
Parties moved into the Flat
Wife moved out of the Flat with the Children
Wife filed the Writ of Divorce
Wife returned to the Flat with the Children
Interim Judgment granted
Ancillary Matters hearing took place
Ancillary Matters hearing took place
Ancillary Matters Order made
Appeal hearing
Appeal hearing
Appeal hearing
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Care and Control of Children
    • Outcome: Care and control granted to the Wife.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Access to Children
    • Outcome: Husband's weekday access reduced to Mondays and Fridays.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Maintenance of Children
    • Outcome: Husband ordered to pay $1,000.00 monthly for maintenance of the Children.
    • Category: Substantive
  4. Maintenance of Wife
    • Outcome: Nominal maintenance order rescinded.
    • Category: Substantive
  5. Division of Matrimonial Home
    • Outcome: Flat to be divided in the ratio of 52.5:47.5 between the Wife and the Husband.
    • Category: Substantive
  6. Valuation of Matrimonial Home
    • Outcome: Gross value of Flat should be based on the market value of similar HDB properties in the vicinity, and not the Flat’s surrender value.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Care and control of children
  2. Maintenance of children
  3. Maintenance of wife
  4. Division of matrimonial assets

9. Cause of Actions

  • Divorce

10. Practice Areas

  • Divorce
  • Family Law
  • Matrimonial Law

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
UUU v UUVFamily CourtYes[2019] SGFC 37SingaporeCited for background facts of the case.
CX v CY (minor: custody and access)High CourtYes[2005] 3 SLR(R) 690SingaporeCited for the definition of care and control.
TAU v TATHigh CourtYes[2018] 5 SLR 1089SingaporeCited for the definition of care and control and access.
AUA v ATZCourt of AppealYes[2016] SGCA 41SingaporeCited for the principle of common but differentiated responsibility in assessment of maintenance.
TBC v TBDHigh CourtYes[2015] 4 SLR 59SingaporeCited for the principle that the starting point of equal financial contribution is not an inflexible rule.
TIT v TIUHigh CourtYes[2016] SGHCF 8SingaporeCited for the principle that maintenance of children should be apportioned in accordance with the financial capabilities of the parents.
TDT v TDS and another appeal and another matterCourt of AppealYes[2016] 4 SLR 145SingaporeCited for the principles concerning the grant of nominal maintenance.
TBV v TBWFamily CourtYes[2015] SGFC 44SingaporeCited to support the position of granting nominal maintenance to the wife, but the reasoning was overruled.
ATT v ATSCourt of AppealYes[2012] 2 SLR 859SingaporeCited for the principle that a change in value of an asset between the AM order and the final appeal will not, without more, be sufficient.
AGD v AGFDistrict CourtYes[2011] SGDC 293SingaporeCited for the principle that the surrender value was preferred over the market value as the latter was a speculation.
TIC v TIDCourt of AppealYes[2019] 1 SLR 180SingaporeCited for the principle that when a spouse has been given the option of buying the other spouse’s share in a matrimonial property, the eventual owner of the property should be responsible for the mortgage payments made between the date of the AM Order and the date of completion.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Family Justice Rules 2014 (S 813/2014)

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Women’s Charter (Cap 353, 2009 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Ancillary Matters
  • Care and Control
  • Access
  • Maintenance
  • Matrimonial Home
  • Division Ratio
  • Minimum Occupancy Period
  • Surrender Value
  • Market Value

15.2 Keywords

  • divorce
  • family law
  • matrimonial assets
  • child maintenance
  • spousal maintenance
  • ancillary matters
  • singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Matrimonial Assets
  • Child Custody
  • Spousal Support