Toki v Rewi: Breach of Partnership Duties in Vessel Sale Dispute

In the Singapore Court of Appeal, Brian Ihaea Toki, Stacey Oscar Phua Chunming, and Vessel Offshore Management Pte Ltd appealed against the High Court's decision in favor of Betty Lena Rewi and Pitone Leauga regarding a partnership dispute. The primary legal issue was whether the appellants breached their duties by failing to accept a US$1.2 million offer for a vessel, MV Ngati Haka, leading to a dispute over the final accounts of the dissolved partnership. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellants did breach their duty to secure the best reasonably obtainable price for the vessel.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Ex Tempore judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal over breach of partnership duties for rejecting a US$1.2m vessel offer. Court found partners failed to secure the best price, impacting final accounts.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Brian Ihaea TokiAppellant, DefendantIndividualAppeal DismissedLostGregory Vijayendran, Evelyn Chua Zhi Huei, Andrew Tan Jian Ming
Stacey Oscar Phua ChunmingAppellant, DefendantIndividualAppeal DismissedLostGregory Vijayendran, Evelyn Chua Zhi Huei, Andrew Tan Jian Ming
Vessel Offshore Management Pte LtdAppellant, DefendantCorporationAppeal DismissedLostGregory Vijayendran, Evelyn Chua Zhi Huei, Andrew Tan Jian Ming
Betty Lena RewiRespondent, PlaintiffIndividualAppeal UpheldWonYvette Loretta Anthony, Quek Yong Zhi Timothy
Pitone LeaugaRespondent, PlaintiffIndividualAppeal UpheldWonYvette Loretta Anthony, Quek Yong Zhi Timothy

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJustice of the Court of AppealYes
Woo Bih LiJudge of the Appellate DivisionNo
Quentin LohJudge of the Appellate DivisionNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Gregory VijayendranRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Evelyn Chua Zhi HueiRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Andrew Tan Jian MingRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Yvette Loretta AnthonyOC Queen Street LLC
Quek Yong Zhi TimothyOC Queen Street LLC

4. Facts

  1. Mr. Toki, Ms. Phua, Ms. Rewi, and Mr. Leauga entered into a partnership on 1 August 2010.
  2. The partnership purchased a vessel, the MV Ngati Haka.
  3. The partnership was dissolved by mutual agreement on 8 October 2013.
  4. VOM managed the Vessel for a fee and chartered it out for profit.
  5. On 31 January 2014, the Vessel was valued at US$845,000 by IMSL.
  6. On 22 September 2014, a Nigerian buyer offered US$1.2m for the Vessel.
  7. Mr. Toki rejected the US$1.2m offer and sought US$1.8m.
  8. The Vessel was eventually sold for US$790,000 on 1 September 2017.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Brian Ihaea Toki and others v Betty Lena Rewi and another, Civil Appeal No 123 of 2020, [2021] SGCA 37

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Partnership agreement entered into
Partnership dissolved by mutual agreement
VOM obtained IMSL Valuation report
Mr. Hughes informed Mr. Tan of enquiries from West Africa
Nigerian enquirers offered US$1.2m for the Vessel
Mr. Toki rejected US$1.2m offer
Mr. Toki reduced asking price to US$1.5m
VOM obtained valuation of the Vessel at US$280,000 from SingClass International Pte Ltd
Vessel sold for US$790,000
Cheque from the Tokis dated for share of proceeds
Legal action commenced against Mr Toki and Ms Phua
High Court decision
Court of Appeal judgment delivered

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Partnership Duties
    • Outcome: The court found that Mr. Toki and Ms. Phua breached their duty to the partnership by failing to accept the US$1.2m offer for the Vessel.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to secure best price reasonably obtainable
      • Failure to wind up partnership affairs properly
  2. Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence
    • Outcome: The court held that the appellants were not entitled to raise belated objections to the admissibility of the email on appeal and that the email was admissible under the business records exception to the rule against hearsay.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Objection to admissibility of email on appeal
      • Business records exception to hearsay rule
    • Related Cases:
      • [2006] 3 SLR(R) 769

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Accounting of Partnership Assets
  2. Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Partnership Duties

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Shipping
  • Security Consultancy

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Betty Lena Rewi and another v Brian Ihaea Toki and othersHigh CourtYes[2020] SGHC 226SingaporeThe decision of the High Court that was appealed against in this case.
Jet Holding and others v Cooper Cameron (Singapore) Pte Ltd and another and other appealsCourt of AppealYes[2006] 3 SLR(R) 769SingaporeCited for the principle that a party cannot object to the admissibility of evidence on appeal if they did not object to its admission at trial.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed)Singapore
Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed) s 32(1)(b)(iv)Singapore
Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed) s 32(3)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Partnership
  • Dissolution
  • Vessel
  • Breach of Duty
  • Valuation
  • Offer
  • Hearsay
  • Best Price
  • Final Accounts

15.2 Keywords

  • Partnership
  • Vessel
  • Breach of Duty
  • Singapore
  • Appeal
  • Dissolution
  • MV Ngati Haka

16. Subjects

  • Partnership Law
  • Commercial Law
  • Civil Litigation

17. Areas of Law

  • Partnership Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Contract Law