Andrew Tan Jian Ming

Andrew Tan Jian Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in credit and security and partnership law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Ship Management	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Dissolution of Partnership	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Wind Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Reopening of transactions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andrew Tan Jian Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andrew Tan Jian Ming has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Toki v Rewi: Breach of Partnership Duties in Vessel Sale Dispute(Apr 2021) Chen Yun Hian Christopher v BHNV Online Ltd: Conflict of Laws & Jurisdiction in Fraud Claim(Dec 2020)
Lee & Lee	1 cases	33% of cases	Evan Lim v MWA Capital: Reopening Loan Transactions under Moneylenders Act(Nov 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andrew Tan Jian Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.5 parties avg	4.5	67%
Won	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andrew Tan Jian Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	120,000.00	40,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Toki v Rewi: Breach of Partnership Duties in Vessel Sale Dispute 12 Apr 2021 Brian Ihaea Toki (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	12 Apr 2021	Brian Ihaea Toki (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $40,000 to be paid to the respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Chen Yun Hian Christopher v BHNV Online Ltd: Conflict of Laws & Jurisdiction in Fraud Claim 30 Dec 2020 Gilad Tisona (Defendant)Won	30 Dec 2020	Gilad Tisona (Defendant): Application GrantedDefendant's application granted; court declared it lacked jurisdiction over the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Evan Lim v MWA Capital: Reopening Loan Transactions under Moneylenders Act 12 Nov 2018 Evan Lim Industrial / Warehousing Development Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	12 Nov 2018	Evan Lim Industrial / Warehousing Development Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the High Court's decision was dismissed. Costs of the appeal fixed at $38,000 (inclusive of disbursements) in favour of each of the respondents. Costs of the Liquidators’ joinder application fixed at $10,000 and $2,000 (both inclusive of disbursements) in favour of the Liquidators and MWA respectively. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.