Borneo Ventures v Ong Han Nam: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Land Warranty

In Borneo Ventures Pte Ltd v Ong Han Nam, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore assessed damages following a breach of warranty in a share subscription agreement. The court, presided over by Senior Judge Lai Siu Chiu, found Ong Han Nam liable to Borneo Ventures for breach of the Land Warranty. The court awarded Borneo Ventures RM26,117,500.00, representing 77.5% of the fair market value of the Subject Land as of March 26, 2014, plus statutory interest. The court rejected the defendant's expert valuation and favored the plaintiff's valuation, adjusted for demolition costs and potential development charges.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Assessment of damages for breach of land warranty in share subscription agreement. Court awards Borneo Ventures RM26,117,500.00 plus interest.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Borneo Ventures Pte. Ltd.PlaintiffCorporationJudgment for PlaintiffWonTeh Guek Gor Engelin SC, Yeo Yian Hui Mark, Charmaine Lim
Ong Han Nam @ Edward OngDefendantIndividualClaim DismissedLostAndy Lem, Sharmini Sharon Selvaratnam, Poon Pui Yee, Cherrilynn Chia

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lai Siu ChiuSenior JudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Teh Guek Gor Engelin SCEngelin Teh Practice LLC
Yeo Yian Hui MarkEngelin Teh Practice LLC
Charmaine LimEngelin Teh Practice LLC
Andy LemHarry Elias Partnership LLP
Sharmini Sharon SelvaratnamHarry Elias Partnership LLP
Poon Pui YeeHarry Elias Partnership LLP
Cherrilynn ChiaHarry Elias Partnership LLP

4. Facts

  1. Borneo Ventures acquired 77.5% of Sutera Harbour Group for approximately RM700 million.
  2. The acquisition was completed on March 26, 2014.
  3. Ong Han Nam breached the Land Warranty by selling the Subject Land to OBSB without Borneo's knowledge.
  4. The Court of Appeal determined that damages were an adequate remedy for the breach.
  5. The Subject Land was initially intended for industrial use but had potential for mixed-use development.
  6. The Co-Gen Plant on the Subject Land ceased operations and was either dormant or defunct.
  7. The KK Draft Plan zoned the Subject Land for mixed-use development.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Borneo Ventures Pte Ltd v Ong Han Nam, Suit No 1268 of 2016(Assessment of Damages No 19 of 2021), [2022] SGHC 162

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Share subscription agreement signed
Acquisition completed
Trial to determine liability began
First judgment issued
Appeal judgment issued
Assessment of damages hearing began
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found the defendant liable for breach of the Land Warranty.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Breach of Land Warranty
    • Related Cases:
      • [2020] SGHC 91
      • [2021] 1 SLR 1248
  2. Assessment of Damages
    • Outcome: The court assessed damages based on the fair market value of the Subject Land at the time of purchase, deducting for demolition costs and potential development charges.
    • Category: Procedural
  3. Admissibility of Evidence
    • Outcome: The court ruled on the admissibility of documents presented by both parties.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [2005] 4 SLR(R) 417

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Breach of Warranty

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Assessment of Damages

11. Industries

  • Real Estate
  • Energy

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Borneo Ventures Pte Ltd v Ong Han NamHigh CourtYes[2020] SGHC 91SingaporeThe first judgment established the defendant's liability for breach of warranties in the share subscription agreement, which is the basis for the current assessment of damages.
Ong Han Nam v Borneo Ventures Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2021] 1 SLR 1248SingaporeThe Court of Appeal partially allowed the defendant's appeal, varying the first judgment and specifying that damages would be an adequate remedy for the breach of the Land Warranty. The current assessment of damages is based on the Court of Appeal's instructions.
Jet Holdings Ltd and Others v Cooper Cameron (Singapore) Pte LtdN/AYes[2005] 4 SLR(R) 417SingaporeCited regarding the requirements for admitting documents as evidence.
Asia Hotel Investments Ltd v Starwood Asia Pacific Management Pte Ltd and AnotherHigh CourtYes[2007] SGHC 50SingaporeCited for the principle that actual partiality, rather than the appearance of partiality, is the crucial test in deciding whether the evidence of an expert should be discounted.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Order 40A r 2 of the Rules of Court Cap 322 R 5

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Evidence Act 1893Singapore
Rules of Court (Cap 322 r 5)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Share Subscription Agreement
  • Land Warranty
  • Sutera Harbour Group
  • Sembulan Land
  • Subject Land
  • Co-Gen Plant
  • Mixed Use
  • Fair Market Value
  • Assessment of Damages
  • KK Draft Plan

15.2 Keywords

  • breach of contract
  • land warranty
  • assessment of damages
  • real estate valuation
  • mixed use development

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Damages
  • Real Estate Valuation

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Valuation Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Damages Assessment