Andy Lem

Andy Lem is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and schemes of arrangement. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 31% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Andy Lem has demonstrated expertise across 51 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice19% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Purchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Subscription Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Warranty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Open justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pre-action Interrogatories	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Andy Lem has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Andy Lem has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	7 cases	54% of cases	Borneo Ventures v Ong Han Nam: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Land Warranty(Jul 2022) SK Engineering v. Conchubar Aromatics: Schemes of Arrangement & Related Creditors(Aug 2017) Re Conchubar Aromatics Ltd: Scheme of Arrangement, Creditor Voting & Companies Act s 210(Dec 2016)
Harry Elias Partnership	5 cases	38% of cases	Edwards v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group: Multi-Currency Loan Dispute(Mar 2012) Shafeeg bin Salim Talib v Helmi bin Ali: Striking Out & Forum Non Conveniens(Jul 2011) Sundercan Ltd v Salzman: Specific Performance & Contract Formation Dispute(Mar 2010)
Teoh and Co	1 cases	8% of cases	Tong Guan Food Products v Teo Cheow Ngoh: Breach of Director's Duty & Trust Claim(Nov 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Andy Lem's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 4 (31%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.4 parties avg	3.4	38%
Partial	36.3 parties avg	6.3	23%
Won	53.1 parties avg	3.1	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2004	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2008	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Andy Lem's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(38%)	38%
Partial	3(23%)	23%
Won	5(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
AUD	2,964,795.63	2,964,795.631 cases	1
SGD	0.00	0.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Borneo Ventures v Ong Han Nam: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Land Warranty 07 Jul 2022 Ong Han Nam @ Edward Ong (Defendant)Lost	07 Jul 2022	Ong Han Nam @ Edward Ong (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; the defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff the sum of RM26,117,500.00 plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	SK Engineering v. Conchubar Aromatics: Schemes of Arrangement & Related Creditors 29 Aug 2017 Conchubar Aromatics Ltd (Respondent)Lost	29 Aug 2017	Conchubar Aromatics Ltd (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the Judge’s order sanctioning the Schemes as well as his order for a one-year moratorium under s 210(10) of the Companies Act on all pending, contingent or fresh actions against the two Scheme Companies with effect from 29 August 2016 was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Re Conchubar Aromatics Ltd: Scheme of Arrangement, Creditor Voting & Companies Act s 210 19 Dec 2016 Conchubar Aromatics Ltd (Applicant)Won	19 Dec 2016	Conchubar Aromatics Ltd (Applicant): Scheme SanctionedThe court granted the sanction for the proposed scheme of arrangement.
4	Foo Jong Long Dennis v Ang Yee Lim Lawrence: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Conspiracy 27 Jan 2016 Ang Yee Lim @ Ang Yee Lim Lawrence (Defendant)Won	27 Jan 2016	Ang Yee Lim @ Ang Yee Lim Lawrence (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; all claims against him dismissed.
5	Foo Jong Long Dennis v Ang Yee Lim: Implied Undertaking & Use of Disclosed Documents 28 Jan 2015 Ang Yee Lim (Defendant)Lost	28 Jan 2015	Ang Yee Lim (Defendant): Appeal against ruling on preliminary issueThe Defendants appealed against the court's ruling on the preliminary issue.
6	Haywood Management Ltd v Eagle Aero Technology Pte Ltd: Pre-Action Discovery & Conspiracy/Fraud Claim 18 Aug 2014 Haywood Management Ltd (Applicant, Respondent)Partial	18 Aug 2014	Haywood Management Ltd (Applicant, Respondent): Application for pre-action discovery granted in partApplication for pre-action discovery granted in part; application for pre-action interrogatories not granted at this stage. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Breach of Directors' Duties & Conspiracy 30 Oct 2012 Lawrence Ang (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	30 Oct 2012	Lawrence Ang (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal Allowed in PartLawrence Ang's claim of conspiracy against Margaret Tung and Lin Jian Wei was partially allowed.
8	Edwards v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group: Multi-Currency Loan Dispute 20 Mar 2012 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Defendant)Won	20 Mar 2012	Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedThe defendant's counterclaim against the plaintiff was allowed for AUD 2,964,795.63.
9	Shafeeg bin Salim Talib v Helmi bin Ali: Striking Out & Forum Non Conveniens 06 Jul 2011 Helmi bin Ali bin Salim bin Talib (Defendant, Respondent)Won	06 Jul 2011	Helmi bin Ali bin Salim bin Talib (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the decision of the Assistant Registrar was allowed.
10	Sundercan Ltd v Salzman: Specific Performance & Contract Formation Dispute 22 Mar 2010 Sundercan Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Mar 2010	Sundercan Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim for specific performance was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation: Sovereign Immunity & Interpleader Proceedings 23 Mar 2008 Republic of the Philippines (Appellant)Lost	23 Mar 2008	Republic of the Philippines (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Republic of the Philippines was ordered to bear 50% of the costs of the respondents in the appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Tong Guan Food Products v Teo Cheow Ngoh: Breach of Director's Duty & Trust Claim 18 Nov 2004 Equity Harvest Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Won	18 Nov 2004	Equity Harvest Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant.
13	Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation 23 Apr 2000 Business Software Alliance (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	23 Apr 2000	Business Software Alliance (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the right to seek discovery, but the specific discovery requests were deemed too broad. Applications remitted for reconsideration. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).