Appelqvist v Eon Reality: Breach of Employment Contract & Unpaid Commission

In a suit before the General Division of the High Court of Singapore, Pontus Paal Appelqvist, a former Vice President of Sales for Asia-Pacific at Eon Reality Pte Ltd, claimed unpaid salary and outstanding sales commissions following his termination. Eon Reality Pte Ltd, and Eon Reality Inc. as plaintiffs-in-counterclaim, disputed the claims and filed a counterclaim for breach of contract and duty of care. The court, presided over by Choo Han Teck J, allowed Appelqvist's claim in part, awarding him S$95,000 for salary in lieu of notice and S$670,698.55 for outstanding commissions, while dismissing the counterclaim.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court of the republic of singapore

1.2 Outcome

Claim allowed in part; Counterclaim dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Pontus Appelqvist sues Eon Reality for breach of employment contract, claiming unpaid salary and commissions. The court allows the claim in part, awarding salary and some commissions.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Pontus Paal AppelqvistPlaintiff, Defendant-in-CounterclaimIndividualClaim allowed in partPartial
Eon Reality Pte LtdDefendant, Plaintiffs-in-CounterclaimCorporationCounterclaim dismissedDismissed
Eon Reality IncPlaintiffs-in-CounterclaimCorporationCounterclaim dismissedDismissed

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff was employed as Vice President of Sales for Asia-Pacific at the defendant company.
  2. The plaintiff's employment was terminated on 3 March 2021 with one month's salary in lieu of notice.
  3. The plaintiff's remuneration consisted of a fixed salary and a commission based on EON Net Sales.
  4. The plaintiff claimed unpaid salary in lieu of notice and outstanding sales commissions.
  5. The defendant disputed liability for some projects, claiming they were 'washout' or non-performing.
  6. The defendant introduced a 'project washout' clause in the September 2020 Sales Policy and Procedures.
  7. The plaintiff signed the last amendment to the Employment Contract on 1 February 2020.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Appelqvist, Pontus Paal v Eon Reality Pte Ltd, Suit No 469 of 2021, [2022] SGHC 296

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Contract offer dated
1st Addendum made to contract
Last addendum made to contract
Plaintiff informed that three projects were deemed 'washout'
Plaintiff made aware of 2020 Sales Policy and Procedures
Plaintiff's employment terminated
2020 Sales Policy and Procedures backdated to
2020 Sales Policy and Procedures backdated to
Judgment reserved
Trial began
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Employment Contract
    • Outcome: The court found that the defendant breached the employment contract by failing to provide the plaintiff with the correct notice period.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to provide adequate notice period
      • Unilateral variation of contract terms
  2. Entitlement to Sales Commissions
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to commissions on some projects but not others, based on the net sales and the terms of the employment contract and sales policy.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Interpretation of sales policy and procedures
      • Calculation of net sales
      • Validity of 'project washout' clause
  3. Breach of Duty of Care
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff did not owe a duty to perform customer due diligence.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to perform due diligence
      • Scope of employment duties

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Unpaid Salary
  2. Outstanding Sales Commissions

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Breach of Duty of Care

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Employment Disputes

11. Industries

  • Technology
  • Education
  • Government

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Press Automation Technology Pte Ltd v Trans-Link Exhibition Forwarding Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2003] 1 SLR(R) 712SingaporeCited for the principle that onerous and unusual conditions can be incorporated into a signed contract with an explicit incorporating clause, even if the signing party was not specifically drawn to them.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Employment Act (Cap 91, 2009 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Employment Contract
  • Sales Commission Report
  • Sales Policy and Procedures
  • EON Net Sales
  • Interactive Digital Centre
  • Project washout
  • Costs of Goods Sold
  • Commission Percentage
  • Commission Advances
  • Commission Split

15.2 Keywords

  • employment contract
  • sales commission
  • virtual reality
  • augmented reality
  • termination
  • notice period
  • washout projects

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Employment Law
  • Contract Law
  • Commercial Litigation