Tian Keyun

Tian Keyun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tian Keyun has demonstrated expertise across 47 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest in land	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liability of co-owner to account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Documentary evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accounting and Inquiry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of duty to perform due diligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tian Keyun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tian Keyun has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Yuen Law LLC	6 cases	67% of cases	Ho Tze Woon v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Failure to Provide Adequate CPR(Sep 2023) Aw Chee Peng v Aw Chee Loo: Accounting for Rental Proceeds Dispute(Jun 2023) Lim Tong Zhen Kevryn v Cheo Jean Sheng: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share Dilution Dispute(Dec 2022)
WongPartnership LLP	3 cases	33% of cases	Shipworks v Sembcorp Marine: Breach of Contract & Illegality in Shipyard Services(Dec 2024) Farm to Fork Sdn Bhd v Adamas Sg Pte Ltd: Breach of Confidence, Contract, and Inducement of Breach of Contract(Nov 2024) Third Eye Capital Corp v Pretty View Shipping SA: Riddick Principle & Disclosure(Apr 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tian Keyun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	11%
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Partial	33.3 parties avg	3.3	33%
Won	53.3 parties avg	3.3	56%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	33.6 parties avg	3.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tian Keyun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(10%)	10%
Lost	1(10%)	10%
Partial	3(30%)	30%
Won	5(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
MYR	3,032,233.25	3,032,233.251 cases	1
SGD	142,562.48	28,512.505 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	4 22	Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Shipworks v Sembcorp Marine: Breach of Contract & Illegality in Shipyard Services 19 Dec 2024 Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim)Partial	19 Dec 2024	Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim): Counterclaim Partially AllowedCounterclaim for payments made to the plaintiff partially allowed; quantum to be determined jointly by parties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Farm to Fork Sdn Bhd v Adamas Sg Pte Ltd: Breach of Confidence, Contract, and Inducement of Breach of Contract 13 Nov 2024 Kim Jin Wu (Defendant)Won	13 Nov 2024	Kim Jin Wu (Defendant): Claims DismissedAll claims against Kim Jin Wu were dismissed.
3	Third Eye Capital Corp v Pretty View Shipping SA: Riddick Principle & Disclosure 02 Apr 2024 Third Eye Capital Corporation (Claimant)Won	02 Apr 2024	Third Eye Capital Corporation (Claimant): Application allowedThird Eye's application to use the EJD Information in the RMI Application was allowed. The Defendants were ordered to pay costs fixed at S$15,000 in costs, with disbursements to be agreed by the parties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ho Tze Woon v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Failure to Provide Adequate CPR 10 Sep 2023 Ho Tze Woon (Appellant)Partial	10 Sep 2023	Ho Tze Woon (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against conviction dismissed, but appeal against sentence allowed and suspension reduced from nine months to three months.
5	Aw Chee Peng v Aw Chee Loo: Accounting for Rental Proceeds Dispute 04 Jun 2023 Aw Chee Loo (Defendant)Lost	04 Jun 2023	Aw Chee Loo (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe defendant will have to pay the plaintiff one-third of the net amount of $182,707.44, which is $60,902.48. Interest on the net amount at 5.33% per annum which accrues until the date of this decision; thereafter, interest accrues on the net amount (and also on any unpaid costs awarded in this decision) at 5.33% per annum until payment is made to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Lim Tong Zhen Kevryn v Cheo Jean Sheng: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share Dilution Dispute 18 Dec 2022 Ching Sheue Siant Joey (Defendant)Won	18 Dec 2022	Ching Sheue Siant Joey (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the Defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
7	Appelqvist v Eon Reality: Breach of Employment Contract & Unpaid Commission 29 Nov 2022 Eon Reality Inc (Plaintiffs-in-Counterclaim)Dismissed	29 Nov 2022	Eon Reality Inc (Plaintiffs-in-Counterclaim): Counterclaim dismissedCounterclaim for breach of contract and duty of care dismissed.
8	Urs Eller v Cheong Kiat Wah: Trust Breach, Share Dilution, Equitable Compensation 09 Nov 2021 Urs Eller (Plaintiff)Won	09 Nov 2021	Urs Eller (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffEquitable compensation awarded in the amount of RM 3,032,233.25 (assumed MYR, as the company is Malaysian).
9	Marina Towage Pte Ltd v Chin Kwek Chong: Fraudulent Trading & Directors' Liability 20 Apr 2021 Chin Chee Chien (Defendant)Won	20 Apr 2021	Chin Chee Chien (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the second defendant.