Sai Wan Shipping v Landmark Line: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice

In Sai Wan Shipping Ltd v Landmark Line Co, Ltd, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore heard an application to set aside an arbitration award. The plaintiff, Sai Wan Shipping Ltd, challenged the award, arguing a breach of natural justice due to the arbitrator's peremptory order. Philip Jeyaretnam J granted the order setting aside the entire second award, finding that the arbitrator breached the fair hearing rule and the equal treatment rule, leading to prejudice against the plaintiff.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Order granted setting aside the entire second award, pursuant to s 24(b) of the IAA and Art 34(2)(a)(ii) of the Model Law.

1.3 Case Type

Arbitration

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore court sets aside an arbitration award in Sai Wan Shipping v Landmark Line due to a breach of natural justice, citing unfair peremptory order.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Sai Wan Shipping LtdPlaintiffCorporationAppeal AllowedWonOng Sing Huat, Kok Jia An Alwyn, Chia Kia Boon
Landmark Line Co, LtdDefendantCorporationAppeal DismissedLostBazul Ashhab, Chan Cong Yen Lionel (Chen Congren), Chang Guo En Nicholas Winarta Chandra

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Philip JeyaretnamJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Ong Sing HuatRobert Wang & Woo LLP
Kok Jia An AlwynRobert Wang & Woo LLP
Chia Kia BoonRobert Wang & Woo LLP
Bazul AshhabOon & Bazul LLP
Chan Cong Yen Lionel (Chen Congren)Oon & Bazul LLP
Chang Guo En Nicholas Winarta ChandraOon & Bazul LLP

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff, Sai Wan Shipping Ltd, chartered a vessel owned by the defendant, Landmark Line Co, Ltd.
  2. A dispute arose primarily over unpaid hire and periods of off-hire.
  3. The arbitration clause in the charterparty stipulated arbitration in Singapore with each party appointing an arbitrator.
  4. The Owner appointed Mr. Alan Oakley as the sole arbitrator after the Charterer failed to nominate one.
  5. The arbitrator issued a peremptory order barring the Charterer from advancing any defence or counterclaim if they failed to meet a specified deadline.
  6. The Charterer's defense submissions were submitted slightly late due to internet connectivity issues.
  7. The arbitrator excluded the Charterer's defense submissions and proceeded to make an award in favor of the Owner.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Sai Wan Shipping Ltd v Landmark Line Co, Ltd, Originating Summons No 869 of 2021, [2022] SGHC 8

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Partial/Final Arbitration Award issued
Owner served claim submissions
Arbitrator ordered Charterer to provide defence by 31 March 2021
Brown Marine asked the tribunal to review the exchange and make an order
Arbitrator issued a final and peremptory order
Charterer served its defence submissions
Brown Marine responded that the Charterer’s defence submissions should not be admitted into evidence
Arbitrator invited the Owner to put in further evidence and submissions
Fichte renewed its protest and objection
Second/Final Arbitration Award issued
Affidavit of Tanjore Sunilkumar Srinivas filed
Plaintiff’s and Defendant's Written Submissions dated
Hearing date
Hearing date
Defendant’s Further Written Submissions dated
Letters to court dated from Robert Wang & Woo LLP
Letter to court dated from Oon & Bazul LLP
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Natural Justice
    • Outcome: The court found that the arbitrator breached the principles of natural justice by failing to give the Charterer a fair opportunity to present its case and by treating the parties unequally.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to provide adequate notice
      • Failure to provide opportunity to be heard
      • Unequal treatment of parties
  2. Powers of Arbitrator
    • Outcome: The court clarified the powers of an arbitrator in a Singapore-seated ad hoc arbitration, emphasizing the application of the UNCITRAL Model Law and the need to consult parties on procedural matters.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Scope of peremptory orders
      • Enforcement of peremptory orders
      • Application of Model Law

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Setting Aside of Arbitration Award

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Setting Aside of Arbitration Award

10. Practice Areas

  • Arbitration
  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Shipping

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2007] 3 SLR(R) 86SingaporeCited for the analytical framework to set aside an arbitration award on the basis of a breach of natural justice.
Wellmix Organics (International) Pte Ltd v Lau Yu ManN/AYes[2006] 2 SLR(R) 117SingaporeCited for the principle that courts will enforce draconian orders only if the party breaches the order intentionally and contumeliously or contumaciously.
Yee Hong Pte Ltd v Powen Electrical Engineering Pte LtdN/AYes[2005] 3 SLR(R) 512SingaporeCited to support the arbitrator's power to make a peremptory order.
China Machine New Energy Corp v Jaguar Energy Guatemala LLC and anotherCourt of AppealYes[2020] 1 SLR 695SingaporeCited for propositions on the high threshold for finding a breach of natural justice and the limitations on the right to be heard.
CBS v CBPCourt of AppealYes[2021] 1 SLR 935SingaporeCited for the approach a court should take to procedural decisions of a tribunal.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A, 2002 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Peremptory order
  • Natural justice
  • Arbitration award
  • UNCITRAL Model Law
  • Fair hearing rule
  • Equal treatment rule
  • Sufficient cause
  • Defence submissions
  • Off-hire
  • Ad hoc arbitration

15.2 Keywords

  • arbitration
  • natural justice
  • peremptory order
  • Singapore
  • shipping
  • model law
  • award
  • charterparty

16. Subjects

  • Arbitration
  • Shipping Law
  • Civil Procedure

17. Areas of Law

  • Arbitration Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Breach of Natural Justice