Elias Xanthopoulos v Rotating Offshore Solutions: Appeal on Unpaid Fees and Contractual Terms

Elias Xanthopoulos appealed against the High Court's decision to dismiss his claim for unpaid fees against Rotating Offshore Solutions Pte Ltd. The Appellate Division of the High Court allowed the appeal in part, finding that Xanthopoulos was entitled to reasonable compensation for his work as project manager of the MODEC Project, but dismissed the appeal regarding the Caevest Project. The court varied the costs order made below to increase the percentage of the Appellant’s costs from 25% to 33%.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Appellate Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed in Part

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Ex Tempore Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding unpaid fees for projects. The court allowed the appeal in part, finding entitlement to compensation for the MODEC Project.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Quentin LohJudge of the Appellate DivisionYes
Kannan RameshJudge of the High CourtNo
Hoo Sheau PengJudge of the High CourtNo

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The Appellant claimed for unpaid fees pertaining to certain projects against RO Solutions under the ROSE Agreement.
  2. The Appellant sought relief as a minority shareholder of ROSE from the oppressive conduct of RO Solutions and Mr Lim.
  3. The Judge allowed the Appellant’s minority oppression claim but dismissed all his other claims for unpaid fees.
  4. The Appellant was the managing director and minority shareholder of ROSE and the engineering director of RO Solutions.
  5. The Appellant was appointed as project manager for the MODEC Project from November 2014 to June 2015.
  6. The Appellant resigned from his positions as engineering director at RO Solutions and managing director of ROSE on 1 July 2018.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Elias Xanthopoulos v Rotating Offshore Solutions Pte Ltd and others, Civil Appeal No 101 of 2021, [2022] SGHC(A) 17

6. Timeline

DateEvent
ROSE Agreement signed
RO Solutions began paying Appellant an additional S$15,000 per month
Appellant appointed project manager for the MOPU BOSS1 Project
Appellant's role as project manager for the MOPU BOSS1 Project ended
Appellant appointed project manager for the MODEC Project
MODEC Project started
Appellant's role as project manager for the MODEC Project ended
Appellant appointed project manager for the MOPU D18 Project
Appellant's role as project manager for the MOPU D18 Project ended
RO Solutions entered into a contract with Caevest Private Limited for the Caevest Project
RO Solutions sent a letter to the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority stating that the Appellant’s designation at RO Solutions was Engineering Director and his fixed salary was $15,000
Appellant resigned from his positions as engineering director at RO Solutions and managing director of ROSE
Mr Chia was managing director of RO Solutions
Suit 626 filed
Notice of appeal dated
Appellant’s case dated
Respondent’s case dated
Judgment delivered

7. Legal Issues

  1. Entitlement to Commission
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the Appellant’s claim for commission for the Caevest Project.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Entitlement to Compensation
    • Outcome: The court found that the Appellant is entitled to reasonable compensation for his work as project manager of the MODEC Project.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Unpaid fees
  2. Relief as a minority shareholder

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Offshore Solutions
  • Engineering

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Xanthopoulos, Elias v Rotating Offshore Solutions Pte Ltd and othersHigh CourtYes[2021] SGHC 197SingaporeThe current appeal is against the High Court Judge’s decision in this case to dismiss the appellant's claim for unpaid fees.
Global Yellow Pages Ltd v Promedia Directories Pte Ltd and another matterCourt of AppealYes[2017] 2 SLR 185SingaporeCited regarding the court's discretion to consider arguments raised in a reply even if it was not required to be filed.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
O 56A r 9(7) of the Rules of Court (2014 Rev Ed)

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Rules of Court (2014 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • ROSE Agreement
  • Caevest Project
  • MODEC Project
  • Commission
  • Reasonable compensation
  • Project manager

15.2 Keywords

  • unpaid fees
  • contractual terms
  • commission
  • compensation
  • project management
  • minority shareholder
  • oppressive conduct

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contractual Disputes
  • Appeals
  • Civil Procedure