Kyle Gabriel Peters

Kyle Gabriel Peters is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings. Their track record shows a 19.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 54% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated expertise across 63 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of court proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choses in Action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts of indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent Judgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moneylending	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kyle Gabriel Peters has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kyle Gabriel Peters has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PDLegal LLC	5 cases	38% of cases	ByBit Fintech Ltd v Ho Kai Xin: Summary Judgment for Crypto Asset Theft and Constructive Trust(Jul 2023) Kristin Annus v Jekaterina Annus: Enforcement of Undertaking as to Damages in Interim Injunction(Apr 2023) Elias Xanthopoulos v Rotating Offshore Solutions: Appeal on Unpaid Fees and Contractual Terms(Apr 2022)
Straits Law Practice LLC	5 cases	38% of cases	Zetta Jet Pte Ltd & Anor v Asia Aviation Holdings: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of US Bankruptcy Proceedings(Mar 2019) Liberty Sky Investments v Goh Seng Heng: Indemnity & Guarantee Dispute(Feb 2019) SME Care Pte Ltd v Jannie Chan: Guarantee, Settlement Agreement, and Consent Judgment Dispute(Apr 2018)
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	2 cases	15% of cases	Alternative Advisors Investments v Asidokona Mining Resources: Striking Out & Disclosure(Jun 2020) GVR Global Pte Ltd v Wayne Burt Pte Ltd: Stay of Winding-Up Order Application(Apr 2020)
Sng & Co	1 cases	8% of cases	Sim Tee Meng v Haw Wan Sin David: Negligent Misrepresentation by Company Director(Nov 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kyle Gabriel Peters's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 7 (54%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	73.3 parties avg	3.3	54%
Neutral	34.0 parties avg	4.0	23%
Partial	33.3 parties avg	3.3	23%
Won	34.7 parties avg	4.7	23%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2020	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2021	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	25.5 parties avg	5.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kyle Gabriel Peters's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(44%)	44%
Neutral	3(19%)	19%
Partial	3(19%)	19%
Won	3(19%)	19%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	96,671.73	16,111.966 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2021	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ByBit Fintech Ltd v Ho Kai Xin: Summary Judgment for Crypto Asset Theft and Constructive Trust 24 Jul 2023 ByBit Fintech Limited (Claimant)Won	24 Jul 2023	ByBit Fintech Limited (Claimant): Judgment for ClaimantSummary judgment granted in favor of ByBit Fintech Limited. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the jurisdiction's primary currency (SGD) is assumed.
2	Kristin Annus v Jekaterina Annus: Enforcement of Undertaking as to Damages in Interim Injunction 23 Apr 2023 Kristin Annus (Plaintiff)Neutral	23 Apr 2023	Kristin Annus (Plaintiff): Enforcement of undertaking held overEnforcement of the plaintiff’s undertaking as to damages was ordered to be held over until the Estonian proceedings were resolved.
3	Elias Xanthopoulos v Rotating Offshore Solutions: Appeal on Unpaid Fees and Contractual Terms 18 Apr 2022 Lim Boon Chye Victor (Respondent)Neutral	18 Apr 2022	Lim Boon Chye Victor (Respondent): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Elias Xanthopoulos v Rotating Offshore Solutions: Contractual Terms, Minority Shareholder Oppression 30 Aug 2021 ROS Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	30 Aug 2021	ROS Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralNo specific outcome recorded for this party.
5	Sifan Triyono v Flame S.A.: Appeal Against Dismissal of Interim Order for Voluntary Arrangement 10 Mar 2021 Sifan Triyono (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	10 Mar 2021	Sifan Triyono (Applicant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the Assistant Registrar dismissing his application for an interim order was dismissed.
6	Alternative Advisors Investments v Asidokona Mining Resources: Striking Out & Disclosure 17 Jun 2020 Supreme Star Investments Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Jun 2020	Supreme Star Investments Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim struck offThe second plaintiff did not file any appeal of its own. Since the Unless Order was not complied with by the stipulated deadline, the plaintiffs’ claim was struck off accordingly.
7	GVR Global Pte Ltd v Wayne Burt Pte Ltd: Stay of Winding-Up Order Application 29 Apr 2020 GVR Global Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Apr 2020	GVR Global Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application for an indefinite stay of the winding-up order was dismissed.
8	Sim Tee Meng v Haw Wan Sin David: Negligent Misrepresentation by Company Director 18 Nov 2019 Sim Tee Meng (Appellant)Lost	18 Nov 2019	Sim Tee Meng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay costs of the appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Zetta Jet Pte Ltd & Anor v Asia Aviation Holdings: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of US Bankruptcy Proceedings 03 Mar 2019 Asia Aviation Holdings Pte Ltd (Intervener)Lost	03 Mar 2019	Asia Aviation Holdings Pte Ltd (Intervener): Intervention DismissedThe court granted the application for recognition of the US bankruptcy proceedings, effectively dismissing the intervener's objections.
10	Liberty Sky Investments v Goh Seng Heng: Indemnity & Guarantee Dispute 19 Feb 2019 Aesthetic Medical Partners Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Feb 2019	Aesthetic Medical Partners Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	SME Care Pte Ltd v Jannie Chan: Guarantee, Settlement Agreement, and Consent Judgment Dispute 23 Apr 2018 SME Care Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	23 Apr 2018	SME Care Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partPlaintiff's appeal against the AR’s refusal to allow its application to enter judgment based on admission of facts under O 27 was dismissed, but the plaintiff is at liberty to enter the consent judgment under the settlement agreement.
12	Zetta Jet Pte Ltd: Cross-Border Insolvency & Recognition of US Bankruptcy Proceedings 23 Jan 2018 Asia Aviation Holdings Pte Ltd (Intervener)Partial	23 Jan 2018	Asia Aviation Holdings Pte Ltd (Intervener): Partial LossThe court granted limited recognition to the Chapter 7 Trustee, but allowed the intervener to revisit arguments against wider recognition after proceedings in respect of the Singapore injunction.
13	BNP Paribas Wealth Management v Jacob Agam: Stay of Court Proceedings & Forum Shopping 27 Oct 2016 Ruth Agam (Defendant)Lost	27 Oct 2016	Ruth Agam (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).