SAIS Ltd v Hardman: Contractual Damages for Non-Delivery of Shares under Employee Incentive Scheme
SAIS Limited and Kaddra Pte Ltd appealed a decision in favor of Michael Jon Hardman and Nicolas Jack Leon Finck regarding contractual claims for damages resulting from the non-delivery of shares under an employee share incentive scheme. The Appellate Division of the High Court of Singapore partially allowed the appeal, modifying the damages awarded to Finck but upholding the damages awarded to Hardman. The primary legal issue concerned the interpretation of the share incentive plan and the obligations of the appellants to deliver shares to the respondents.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
Appellate Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore1.2 Outcome
Appeal allowed in part.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal regarding contractual claims for damages from non-delivery of shares granted under an employee share incentive scheme. The court partially allowed the appeal.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAIS Limited | Appellant, Defendant | Corporation | Appeal partially allowed | Partial | |
Kaddra Pte Ltd | Appellant, Defendant | Corporation | Appeal partially allowed | Partial | |
Michael Jon Hardman | Respondent, Plaintiff | Individual | Judgment affirmed | Won | |
Nicolas Jack Leon Finck | Respondent, Plaintiff | Individual | Judgment varied | Partial |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Woo Bih Li | Judge of the Appellate Division | Yes |
Quentin Loh | Judge of the Appellate Division | No |
Kannan Ramesh | Judge of the High Court | No |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Respondents were granted restricted share units under an employee share incentive scheme.
- SAIS Limited was listed on the TSX-V.
- Respondents' employment contracts were terminated.
- A Change of Control event occurred with the sale of Sarment Wines.
- Appellants failed to deliver shares to the respondents according to the RSU Plan.
- Hardman agreed to receive bonus units in lieu of a cash bonus.
- Finck's termination letter stipulated he would receive 12,753 shares.
5. Formal Citations
- SAIS Ltd and another v Hardman, Michael Jon and another, Civil Appeal No 27 of 2022, [2022] SGHC(A) 32
- Hardman, Michael Jon and another v SAIS Ltd and another, Suit No 651 of 2020, [2022] SGHC 38
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Michael Jon Hardman commenced employment with Sarment Pte Ltd. | |
Nicolas Jack Leon Finck commenced employment with Sarment Pte Ltd. | |
Kaddra Pte Ltd was incorporated. | |
SAIS Limited was listed on the TSX-V. | |
Nicolas Jack Leon Finck received a letter informing him of restricted share units grant. | |
Nicolas Jack Leon Finck signed the agreement form for the restricted share units grant. | |
Michael Jon Hardman signed a similar form for the restricted share units grant. | |
Senior management of SAIS Limited announced consideration of selling wine and spirits distribution business. | |
Michael Jon Hardman and Nicolas Jack Leon Finck's contracts with Sarment Pte Ltd were terminated. | |
SAIS Limited announced a sale and purchase agreement for Sarment Wines. | |
Shareholders approved the sale and change in shareholding at a general meeting. | |
Nicolas Jack Leon Finck was informed his employment contract would be terminated. | |
Nicolas Jack Leon Finck's employment with Kaddra Pte Ltd ended. | |
SAIS Limited obtained TSX-V approval for the sale of Sarment Wines and announced the closing of the sale. | |
Michael Jon Hardman received shares in SAIS Limited. | |
Mark Joseph Irwin obtained shares from El Greco and CDE. | |
SAIS Limited announced Mark Joseph Irwin held 53.5% of its shares. | |
Michael Jon Hardman executed the Bonus Units Agreement. | |
Michael Jon Hardman was informed he would be made redundant. | |
Michael Jon Hardman tendered his resignation. | |
Kaddra Pte Ltd issued a letter to Michael Jon Hardman regarding terms of resignation. | |
SAIS Limited announced it had filed an application to delist its shares from the TSX-V. | |
Application to delist shares from TSX-V was approved. | |
SAIS Limited's last trading day. | |
Michael Jon Hardman's solicitors wrote to Kaddra Pte Ltd regarding the delay in providing shares. | |
Michael Jon Hardman and Nicolas Jack Leon Finck commenced suit. | |
SAIS Limited unilaterally issued shares in Michael Jon Hardman's name. | |
Judgment reserved. | |
Judgment delivered. |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Contract
- Outcome: The court found a breach of contract for failure to deliver shares under the RSU Plan and Bonus Units Agreement.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Failure to deliver shares
- Repudiatory breach
- Contractual Interpretation
- Outcome: The court interpreted the RSU Plan clauses regarding vesting, settlement, and the effect of a Change of Control event.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Interpretation of vesting clauses
- Interpretation of settlement obligations
- Interaction of different clauses within the RSU Plan
- Effect of Termination on Share Entitlements
- Outcome: The court considered the impact of terminating an employee's contract before a Change of Control event on their share entitlements.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Termination before Change of Control
- Impact of termination letter
8. Remedies Sought
- Monetary Damages
- Specific Performance (delivery of shares)
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
- Contract Disputes
11. Industries
- Wine and Spirits Distribution
- E-commerce
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardman, Michael Jon and another v SAIS Ltd and another | High Court | Yes | [2022] SGHC 38 | Singapore | The judgment under appeal in the present case. |
Zurich Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd v B-Gold Interior Design & Construction Pte Ltd | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2008] 3 SLR(R) 1029 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that specific provisions override general provisions in contractual interpretation. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Restricted Share Units
- RSU Plan
- Vesting Date
- Change of Control
- Termination Date
- Settlement
- Moratorium
- Bonus Units Agreement
15.2 Keywords
- contract
- shares
- employee
- incentive
- scheme
- breach
- damages
- RSU
- vesting
- termination
- control
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Contract Law | 95 |
Restricted Share Unit Plan | 90 |
Employee Share Incentive Scheme | 85 |
Damages | 80 |
Measure of Damages | 70 |
Company Law | 60 |
Commercial Disputes | 50 |
16. Subjects
- Contract Law
- Employment Law
- Corporate Law
- Share Incentive Schemes