Goh Peizhi Adeline

Goh Peizhi Adeline is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and employee share incentive scheme. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and measure of damages.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Termination	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employee Share Incentive Scheme	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Grossly Improper Conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to cooperate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restricted Share Unit Plan	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Services	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Peizhi Adeline has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Goh Peizhi Adeline has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Withers KhattarWong LLP	4 cases	67% of cases	Ng Koon Yee Mickey v Mah Sau Cheong: Share Purchase Agreement Termination & Set-Off(Sep 2022) SAIS Ltd v Hardman: Contractual Damages for Non-Delivery of Shares under Employee Incentive Scheme(Sep 2022) Hardman v SAIS Ltd: Employee Share Incentive Scheme Dispute After Corporate Restructuring(Feb 2022)
Oon & Bazul LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v Ezekiel Peter Latimer: Disciplinary Proceedings for Conflict of Interest and Grossly Improper Conduct(Apr 2019) Tan Chin Lay Evelyn v Cheng Soo May Stacy: Amendment of Pleadings Dispute(Nov 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Goh Peizhi Adeline's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	33.6 parties avg	3.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Goh Peizhi Adeline's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
CAD	351,451.40	175,725.702 cases	2
SGD	10,000.00	3,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Koon Yee Mickey v Mah Sau Cheong: Share Purchase Agreement Termination & Set-Off 29 Sep 2022 Ng Koon Yee Mickey (Appellant, Plaintiff in counterclaim, Defendant)Won	29 Sep 2022	Ng Koon Yee Mickey (Appellant, Plaintiff in counterclaim, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. Mah Sau Cheong was liable to Ng Koon Yee Mickey for the Tranche 3 Payment. Ng was entitled to judgment for the balance of his counterclaim after the set-off.
2	SAIS Ltd v Hardman: Contractual Damages for Non-Delivery of Shares under Employee Incentive Scheme 19 Sep 2022 Kaddra Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	19 Sep 2022	Kaddra Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal partially allowedAppeal partially allowed regarding Finck's claim; appeal dismissed regarding Hardman's claim.
3	Hardman v SAIS Ltd: Employee Share Incentive Scheme Dispute After Corporate Restructuring 21 Feb 2022 Kaddra Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Feb 2022	Kaddra Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantLiable for damages to plaintiff Hardman for breach of contract related to 2018 bonus.
4	Public Prosecutor v Mohammad Rosli: Murder, Provocation, and Penal Code Interpretation 08 Nov 2021 Mohammad Rosli bin Abdul Rahim (Defense)Lost	08 Nov 2021	Mohammad Rosli bin Abdul Rahim (Defense): ConvictionThe accused was convicted on the charge of murder under s 300(c) of the Penal Code.
5	Law Society of Singapore v Ezekiel Peter Latimer: Disciplinary Proceedings for Conflict of Interest and Grossly Improper Conduct 08 Apr 2019 Ezekiel Peter Latimer (Respondent)Lost	08 Apr 2019	Ezekiel Peter Latimer (Respondent): SanctionedThe respondent was suspended for three years and ordered to pay costs of S$10,000 to the applicant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Tan Chin Lay Evelyn v Cheng Soo May Stacy: Amendment of Pleadings Dispute 06 Nov 2018 Cheng Soo May Stacy (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Neutral	06 Nov 2018	Cheng Soo May Stacy (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal against AR Lee’s decision on costs in SUM 5415/2017 was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.