CVC v CVB: Division of Matrimonial Assets, CPF, Child Maintenance, and Parental Responsibility
In CVC v CVB, the Appellate Division of the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal concerning the division of matrimonial assets, maintenance for children, and costs following a divorce. The court addressed issues related to direct contributions, the valuation of assets including a car workshop business and offshore companies, and the drawing of adverse inferences. The court allowed the appeal in part, adjusting the valuation of the car workshop business, modifying the maintenance orders, and addressing backdated maintenance.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
Appellate Division of the High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal allowed in part.
1.3 Case Type
Family
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Divorce case concerning the division of matrimonial assets, including CPF funds, child maintenance, and parental responsibility. The court addressed direct contributions and asset valuation.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Debbie Ong Siew Ling | Judge of the Appellate Division | Yes |
Valerie Thean | Judge of the High Court | No |
Andre Maniam | Judge of the High Court | No |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Parties married on 3 January 2008 and have three children.
- Husband is a director of three car workshop companies.
- Wife was employed as a company secretary and vice president.
- Parties purchased the Bishan Property in March 2013 and rented it out.
- Parties purchased the Concorde Unit on 15 November 2010 and incorporated GG Pte Ltd.
- Husband transferred $400,000 to Wife in April 2008.
- Husband filed for divorce on 27 April 2017.
5. Formal Citations
- CVC v CVB, Civil Appeal No 68 of 2022, [2023] SGHC(A) 28
- CVB v CVC, , [2022] SGHCF 31
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Parties married | |
Child B born | |
Concorde Unit purchased | |
GG Pte Ltd incorporated | |
Child C born | |
Bishan Property purchased | |
Child D born | |
Husband filed writ for divorce | |
Wife filed defence and counterclaim | |
Interim judgment for divorce granted | |
Independent valuation of companies directed by Family Court | |
GAO Advisors provided first valuation report | |
Ancillary matters hearing (first tranche) | |
GAO Advisors provided second valuation report | |
Ancillary matters hearing (second tranche) | |
Ancillary matters hearing (third tranche); Judge made orders | |
Judge issued grounds of decision | |
Appeal hearing | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Outcome: The court adjusted the valuation of the car workshop business and clarified the treatment of CPF refunds.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Direct contributions
- Indirect contributions
- Valuation of assets
- Adverse inferences
- Child Maintenance
- Outcome: The court modified the maintenance orders and addressed backdated maintenance.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Quantum of maintenance
- Backdated maintenance
- Adverse Inferences
- Outcome: The court found that the Judge erred in drawing an adverse inference against the Wife.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Failure to disclose assets
- Substratum of evidence
8. Remedies Sought
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Maintenance for Children
- Costs
9. Cause of Actions
- Divorce
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Child Maintenance
10. Practice Areas
- Divorce
- Family Law
- Asset Division
- Child Support
11. Industries
- Automotive
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVB v CVC | Family Division of the High Court | Yes | [2022] SGHCF 31 | Singapore | The judgment under appeal; the current judgment reviews the orders made in this case. |
BOR v BOS | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2018] SGCA 78 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court will intervene to correct errors in the computation of matrimonial assets. |
TOT v TOU | High Court | Yes | [2021] SGHC(A) 9 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court will intervene to correct errors in the computation of matrimonial assets. |
NK v NL | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2010] 4 SLR 792 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court may intervene in the assessment of evidence by a court-appointed valuer where the valuer does not act in accordance with his terms of reference, or if his valuation is patently or manifestly in error. |
Sakthivel Punithavathi v Public Prosecutor | High Court | Yes | [2007] 2 SLR 983 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court will not substitute its own views for that of an uncontradicted expert’s. |
ANJ v ANK | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2015] 4 SLR 1043 | Singapore | Cited for setting out the structured approach to achieve a just and equitable division of matrimonial assets. |
USB v USA and another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2020] 2 SLR 588 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the starting point of the division exercise is the identification of the material gains of the marital partnership. |
UDA v UDB and another | High Court | Yes | [2018] 3 SLR 1433 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that ancillary matters proceedings tend to evolve as the case progresses. |
Wan Lai Cheng v Quek Seow Kee and another appeal and another matter | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2012] 4 SLR 405 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that not all inter-spousal acquisitions or transfers of assets are true gifts in the legal sense. |
CLC v CLB | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2023] SGCA 10 | Singapore | Cited for the relevance of the intention of a spouse in bringing non-matrimonial assets into the pool of matrimonial assets. |
WFE v WFF | High Court | Yes | [2023] SGHC(A) 16 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the notion of sharing does not feature in the specific analysis in the determination of the parties’ direct contributions. |
UZN v UZM | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2021] 1 SLR 426 | Singapore | Cited for the principles regarding the duty of full and frank disclosure in ancillary matters proceedings and the drawing of adverse inferences. |
BPC v BPB and another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2019] 1 SLR 608 | Singapore | Cited for the conditions under which the court may draw an adverse inference for failure to disclose information. |
UBM v UBN | High Court | Yes | [2017] 4 SLR 921 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that parties in a functioning marriage may not always keep fastidious records. |
WBI v WBJ | High Court | Yes | [2023] 3 SLR 998 | Singapore | Cited for the proposition that the repayment of CPF monies should always be paid before division of sale proceeds, but the current judgment disagrees with this proposition. |
Lam Chih Kian v Ong Chin Ngoh | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1993] 1 SLR(R) 460 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that CPF moneys are matrimonial assets. |
AMW v AMZ | High Court | Yes | [2011] 3 SLR 955 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that a wife does not need to claim interim maintenance if she is able and willing to wait until the ancillaries are heard to obtain maintenance. |
TAA v TAB | High Court | Yes | [2015] 2 SLR 879 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that parents must place the needs of their children above their own. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Women’s Charter 1961 | Singapore |
s 112(1) of the Women’s Charter 1961 | Singapore |
s 112(2) of the Women’s Charter | Singapore |
s 46(1) of the Women’s Charter | Singapore |
ss 69(4)(a) and (f) of the Women’s Charter | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Matrimonial Assets
- Central Provident Fund
- CPF
- Direct Contributions
- Indirect Contributions
- Discount for Lack of Marketability
- DLOM
- Dissipated Sums
- Maintenance
- Parental Responsibility
15.2 Keywords
- Divorce
- Matrimonial Assets
- Child Maintenance
- CPF
- Singapore
- Family Law
17. Areas of Law
16. Subjects
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Matrimonial Assets
- Child Maintenance