VWM v VWN: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Matrimonial Home Dispute

In the case of VWM v VWN, before the Family Division of the High Court of Singapore, the wife appealed the decision of the District Judge regarding the division of matrimonial assets and the matrimonial home. The court dismissed the wife's appeal, affirming the original orders regarding the division of assets and the surrender of the Built-to-Order (BTO) flat to the Housing and Development Board (HDB). The wife's claim was for a greater share of the matrimonial assets and to be allowed to purchase the matrimonial home in her sole name without refunding the husband's CPF account.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court (Family Division)

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Family

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Divorce case concerning the division of matrimonial assets, including the matrimonial home. The court dismissed the wife's appeal, affirming the original orders.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
VWMAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost
VWNRespondentIndividualOrders AffirmedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lai Siu ChiuSenior JudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Patrick FernandezFernandez LLC

4. Facts

  1. The parties married on 2 May 2015 and have two children.
  2. The husband left the matrimonial home in January 2019.
  3. The wife commenced divorce proceedings in March 2019, and the husband counterclaimed in August 2019.
  4. The District Judge ordered a 64.5:35.5 division of matrimonial assets in favor of the wife.
  5. The District Judge ordered the matrimonial home to be surrendered to the HDB.
  6. The wife appealed the District Judge's decision.
  7. The wife requested that she be attributed 75% as her indirect contribution towards the marriage.
  8. The wife requested that she be allowed to purchase the matrimonial home in her sole name without making any refund to the Husband’s CPF account.

5. Formal Citations

  1. VWM v VWN, District Court Appeal No 73 of 2021, [2023] SGHCF 2

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Marriage of VWM and VWN
Daughter born
Son born
Husband left and stopped living with Wife and children
Wife commenced divorce proceedings
Husband commenced counterclaim
Parties came to an agreement on the divorce proceedings
Interim judgment granted
Parties filed their affidavits of means
Ancillary matters dealt with by a district judge
Appeal hearing
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Division of Matrimonial Assets
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the wife's appeal and affirmed the orders made by the District Judge regarding the division of matrimonial assets.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Greater share of matrimonial assets
  2. Transfer of matrimonial home to wife's sole name

9. Cause of Actions

  • Divorce
  • Division of Matrimonial Assets

10. Practice Areas

  • Divorce
  • Family Law
  • Matrimonial Assets Division

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
USC v USDFamily Justice CourtYes[2020] SGFC 76SingaporeCited for drawing an adverse inference against the Wife for unaccounted expenditures.
TYS v TYTHigh CourtYes[2017] 5 SLR 244SingaporeCited for drawing an adverse inference against the Wife for unaccounted expenditures.
ANJ v ANKHigh CourtYes[2015] 4 SLR 1043SingaporeCited for drawing an adverse inference against the Wife for unaccounted expenditures and for the principle that one component of contribution may assume greater importance than the other.
USA v USBHigh Court (Family Division)Yes[2019] SGHCF 5SingaporeCited as authority for the rule that the date of valuation of the matrimonial assets would ordinarily be the date of hearing of the ancillaries.
TND v TNC and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2017] SGCA 34SingaporeCited as authority for the rule that the date of valuation of the matrimonial assets would ordinarily be the date of hearing of the ancillaries.
AXW v AXXHigh CourtYes[2012] 3 SLR 900SingaporeCited regarding the consideration of the wife's contribution in carrying and giving birth to children.
Soon Peck Wah v Woon Che ChyeCourt of AppealYes[1997] 3 SLR(R) 430SingaporeCited regarding the acknowledgement of the dependence of young children on their mother for care and upbringing.
TUR v TUSFamily CourtYes[2016] SGFC 145SingaporeCited regarding the indirect contribution of the Wife in a marriage that lasted less than three years with two young children.
VVU v VVVFamily CourtYes[2021] SGFC 100SingaporeCited regarding the indirect contribution of the Wife in a one-child marriage that lasted less than three years.
USB v USAHigh CourtYes[2020] 4 SLR 288SingaporeCited to support the submission that there are instances where one component necessarily assumes greater importance than the other on the facts and correspondingly greater weight should be attached to that component as against the other
UAX v UAYFamily CourtYes[2017] SGFC 55SingaporeCited regarding the adjustment of the final ratio upwards by 5% in the wife’s favour.
Tham Khai Meng v Nam Wen Jet BernadetteHigh CourtYes[1997] 1 SLR(R) 336SingaporeCited regarding the children will eventually require a permanent home of their own.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Women’s Charter (Cap 353, 2009 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Matrimonial assets
  • Matrimonial home
  • Built-to-Order (BTO) flat
  • Housing and Development Board (HDB)
  • Central Provident Fund (CPF)
  • Division of assets
  • Indirect contribution
  • Care and control
  • Children's maintenance

15.2 Keywords

  • divorce
  • matrimonial assets
  • family law
  • singapore
  • appeal
  • division of assets
  • matrimonial home

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Matrimonial Assets