Muhammad Nurashik v Public Prosecutor: Driving While Disqualified Appeal

Muhammad Nurashik bin Mohd Nasir appealed to the High Court of Singapore against the sentence imposed by the District Judge for driving while disqualified under the Road Traffic Act. The appellant pleaded guilty to nine charges, including two charges of driving a motor vehicle while disqualified. Justice Vincent Hoong dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction and the consecutive sentences, emphasizing the appellant's repeated offenses and disregard for the law.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Ex Tempore Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal against sentence for driving while disqualified. The High Court upheld the conviction and consecutive sentences, emphasizing the seriousness of repeat offenses.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal DismissedWon
Charlene Tay Chia of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Tay Zhi Jie of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Muhammad Nurashik bin Mohd NasirAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Vincent HoongJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Charlene Tay ChiaAttorney-General’s Chambers
Tay Zhi JieAttorney-General’s Chambers

4. Facts

  1. The Appellant was charged with 17 theft and traffic offences.
  2. The Appellant pleaded guilty to nine charges.
  3. The Appellant was sentenced to an enhanced sentence of 206 days’ imprisonment, 65 months’ imprisonment and disqualification for life.
  4. The Appellant appealed against the sentence for two charges of driving a motor vehicle while disqualified.
  5. The Appellant rode a motorcycle inside a carpark while disqualified.
  6. The Appellant had prior convictions for driving under disqualification on four prior occasions.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Muhammad Nurashik bin Mohd Nasir v Public Prosecutor, Magistrate’s Appeal No 9035 of 2024, [2024] SGHC 161
  2. Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Nurashik Bin Mohd Nasir, , [2024] SGDC 60

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Appellant charged with 17 theft and traffic offences
Appellant rode motorcycle on footway
High Court dismissed the appeal against sentence

7. Legal Issues

  1. Driving While Disqualified
    • Outcome: The court upheld the conviction for driving while disqualified.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Appeal Against Sentence
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the appeal against the sentence.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Setting aside conviction
  2. Reduction of imprisonment terms
  3. Concurrent running of sentences

9. Cause of Actions

  • Driving While Disqualified

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Traffic Law
  • Appeals

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Teo Siong Khoon v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[1995] 1 SLR(R) 435SingaporeCited to support the proposition that the driveway of a Housing Development Board carpark is a 'road' under the Road Traffic Act.
Ang Zhu Ci Joshua v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2016] 4 SLR 1059SingaporeCited for the principle that the mitigating value of a mental condition depends on whether it impairs the individual's ability to control their actions.
Chua Ya Zi Sandy v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2021] SGHC 204SingaporeCited for the principle that hardship to the offender's family has little mitigating value, except in exceptional circumstances.
Lai Oei Mui Jenny v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[1993] 2 SLR(R) 406SingaporeCited regarding the limited mitigating value of hardship to the offender's family.
Muhammad Saiful bin Ismail v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2014] 2 SLR 1028SingaporeCited for the principle that driving while under disqualification is a serious offense that evinces a blatant disregard for the law.
Public Prosecutor v Lee Cheow Loong CharlesHigh CourtYes[2008] 4 SLR(R) 961SingaporeCited for the principle that driving while under disqualification is to be punished robustly because of the danger posed to the public.
Vasentha d/o Joseph v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2015] 5 SLR 122SingaporeCited for the principle that committing an offense while on bail is an aggravating factor.
Public Prosecutor v Raveen BalakrishnanCourt of AppealYes[2018] 5 SLR 799SingaporeCited for the general rule of consecutive sentences for unrelated offenses.
Toh Suat Leng Jennifer v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2022] 5 SLR 1075SingaporeCited for the principle that unreported decisions are of limited precedential value.
Seah Ming Yang Daryle v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2024] SGHC 152SingaporeCited for the principle that offenders who commit offences of driving whilst under disqualification pursuant to s 43(4) of the RTA are inevitably repeat offenders.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Road Traffic Act (Cap 276, 2004 Rev Ed) s 43(4)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 s 375Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 s 400Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Driving while disqualified
  • Road Traffic Act
  • Appeal against sentence
  • Consecutive sentences
  • Disqualification for life
  • Statement of Facts
  • Carpark
  • Footway

15.2 Keywords

  • driving
  • disqualified
  • appeal
  • sentence
  • traffic
  • offence

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Road Traffic Law
  • Sentencing