PP v Iswan bin Ali: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act

In Public Prosecutor v Iswan bin Ali, the High Court of Singapore found Iswan bin Ali guilty of trafficking diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act. Iswan was charged with possessing not less than 61.19 grams of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking. The court altered the charge to reflect the finding that Iswan was guilty of trafficking 51.41g of diamorphine. The court found that the prosecution had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Iswan possessed 51.41g of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking, while raising sufficient doubt as to whether the remaining amount was for the purpose of trafficking.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Guilty

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Iswan bin Ali was charged with possessing diamorphine for trafficking. The court found him guilty of trafficking 51.41g of diamorphine.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyGuiltyWonHon Yi, Yeo Zhen Xiong, Ariel Tan Hui Ru
Iswan bin AliDefendantIndividualGuiltyLostElengovan s/o V Krishnan, Wong Hong Weng Stephen

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Dedar Singh GillJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Hon YiAttorney-General’s Chambers
Yeo Zhen XiongAttorney-General’s Chambers
Ariel Tan Hui RuAttorney-General’s Chambers
Elengovan s/o V KrishnanElengovan Chambers
Wong Hong Weng StephenMatthew Chiong Partnership

4. Facts

  1. CNB officers raided Iswan’s home and arrested him.
  2. Iswan informed Sgt 3 Syazwan that there were drugs kept in his car.
  3. CNB officers searched Iswan's car and seized six packets containing granular / powdery substance.
  4. CNB officers searched Iswan's registered address and seized one packet of crystalline substance.
  5. The seized drug exhibits were weighed and analysed by the HSA.
  6. Iswan admitted that the seized drug exhibits were placed in the car by him.
  7. Iswan stated that he knew that the seized drug exhibits contained ‘heroin’ or ‘panas’, which are the street names for diamorphine.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Iswan bin Ali, Criminal Case No 4 of 2024, [2024] SGHC 239

6. Timeline

DateEvent
CNB officers raided Iswan’s home and arrested him
Iswan informed Sgt 3 Syazwan that there were drugs kept in his car
CNB officers searched Iswan's car and seized six packets containing granular / powdery substance
CNB officers searched Iswan's registered address and seized one packet of crystalline substance
IO Asilah and SI Cindy Ow commenced the weighing of the Seized Drug Exhibits
IO Asilah handed over the case exhibits to SI Cindy Ow
Sgt 3 Sufyan collected the Seized Drug Exhibits and Exhibit J1A1 and brought them to Wendy Lim from the Health Sciences Authority for analysis
s 22 CPC statement recorded from Iswan
s 22 CPC statement recorded from Iswan
s 22 CPC statement recorded from Iswan
Dr Koh conducted a psychiatric assessment on Iswan
Wendy Lim issued nine certificates under s 16 of the MDA, in respect of the Seized Drug Exhibits
s 22 CPC statement recorded from Iswan
s 22 CPC statement recorded from Iswan
s 22 CPC statement recorded from Iswan
s 22 CPC statement recorded from Iswan
Trial began
Judgment reserved
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Trafficking of Controlled Drugs
    • Outcome: The court found the accused guilty of trafficking 51.41g of diamorphine.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Possession of a controlled drug
      • Knowledge of the nature of the drug
      • Possession of the drug for the purpose of trafficking
  2. Chain of Custody
    • Outcome: The court found that the prosecution had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the drug exhibits analysed by the HSA were the Seized Drug Exhibits.
    • Category: Procedural
  3. Presumption of Trafficking
    • Outcome: The court found that the presumption of trafficking applied to the accused as he was found in possession of more than 2g of diamorphine.
    • Category: Substantive
  4. Bailee Defence
    • Outcome: The court found that the bailee defense did not apply as the accused was involved in the sale of the drugs.
    • Category: Substantive
  5. Defence of Consumption
    • Outcome: The court found that there was sufficient doubt as to whether Exhibits C1A and C1B were in his possession for the purpose of trafficking.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Conviction
  2. Imprisonment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Trafficking in a controlled drug

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Muhammad Ridzuan bin Md Ali v Public Prosecutor and other mattersCourt of AppealYes[2014] 3 SLR 721SingaporeSummarized the elements of a charge under s 5(1)(a) of the MDA
Mohamed Affandi bin Rosli v Public Prosecutor and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2019] 1 SLR 440SingaporeThe Prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the drug exhibits analysed by the HSA are the very ones that were initially seized by the CNB officers from the accused
Public Prosecutor v Chen MingjianUnknownYes[2009] 4 SLR(R) 946SingaporeThere cannot be a single moment that is unaccounted for if this would give rise to a reasonable doubt as to the identity of the exhibits
Lai Kam Loy and others v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[1993] 3 SLR(R) 143SingaporeThe Prosecution only needs to laboriously call every single witness to establish the chain of possession of the seized drugs where a doubt as to the identity of an exhibit has arisen
Nguyen Tuong Van v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2005] 1 SLR(R) 103SingaporeWhat is crucially important is to ensure that there has been no mixing of the drug exhibits or the tampering of the contents
Ramesh a/l Perumal v Public Prosecutor and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2019] 1 SLR 1003SingaporeAn accused who took custody of the drugs but intended to and in fact returned the drugs to the person who initially entrusted him with the drugs would not be found to come within the definition of “trafficking”
Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v Public Prosecutor and another matterCourt of AppealYes[2022] 1 SLR 535SingaporeWhere the ‘bailee’ in a ‘bailment’ arrangement knew or intended that the ‘bailment’ would be part of the process of supply and distribution of drugs within society, he would fall within the definition of “trafficking”
Muhammad bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2017] 1 SLR 427SingaporeSeveral relevant factors in dealing with a defence of consumption: (a) the rate of drug consumption; (b) the frequency of supply; (c) whether the accused had the financial means to purchase the drugs for himself; and (d) whether he had made a contrary admission in any of his statements that the whole quantity of drugs was for sale

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Trafficking
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • CNB
  • HSA
  • Bailee
  • Consumption

15.2 Keywords

  • Diamorphine
  • Trafficking
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking

17. Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Statutory offences
  • Misuse of Drugs Act