Oan Chim Seng v Leong Kai Rui: Breach of Oral Investment Agreement & Misrepresentation
In the case of Oan Chim Seng v Leong Kai Rui, before the General Division of the High Court of Singapore on 23 October 2024, Oan Chim Seng claimed that Leong Kai Rui breached an oral investment agreement and made misrepresentations, seeking $4,700,524.24. The court, presided over by Justice Kwek Mean Luck, found in favor of Oan, holding that Leong breached the terms of the investment agreement.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court1.2 Outcome
Judgment for the Claimant
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Oan Chim Seng sues Leong Kai Rui for breach of an oral investment agreement and misrepresentation, seeking $4,700,524.24. The court ruled in favor of Oan.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oan Chim Seng | Claimant | Individual | Claim Allowed | Won | Lam Kuet Keng Steven John |
Leong Kai Rui (Liang Kairui) | Defendant | Individual | Claim Dismissed | Lost | Leong Kai Rui |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Kwek Mean Luck | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Lam Kuet Keng Steven John | Templars Law LLC |
Leong Kai Rui | In-Person |
4. Facts
- Oan and Leong met on 8 November 2019 to discuss investment opportunities.
- Leong agreed to manage $5m of Oan’s funds based on certain terms.
- Oan transferred $5m to Axicorp account on 18 November 2019.
- Leong conducted trades with the funds in the Axicorp account.
- Oan requested a withdrawal of $5m in June 2021 and received $299,475.76.
- Leong sent a WhatsApp message to Jerrold outlining the terms of the investment agreement.
- Leong controlled Oan's trading account and changed the password periodically.
5. Formal Citations
- Oan Chim Seng v Leong Kai Rui (Liang Kairui), Originating Claim No 857 of 2023, [2024] SGHC 268
- ARS v ART and anor, , [2015] SGHC 78
- Xia Zheng v Lee King Anne, , [2024] SGHC 253
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Oan met Leong to discuss investment opportunities | |
WhatsApp group 'Forex Trading [Account]: Oan' was created | |
Leong sent Jerrold WhatsApp messages regarding the investment agreement | |
Oan transferred $5m to Axicorp account | |
Oan received $299,475.76 after withdrawal request | |
Oan commenced suit OC 857 of 2023 | |
Trial began | |
Closing submissions were filed | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Contract
- Outcome: The court held that Leong breached the terms of the Investment Agreement.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Failure to restore investment funds
- Breach of capital guarantee
- Related Cases:
- [2015] SGHC 78
- Misrepresentation
- Outcome: The court found that Oan did not satisfy his burden of proof that the alleged representations were made.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Monetary Damages
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
- Misrepresentation
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Finance
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARS v ART and anor | High Court | Yes | [2015] SGHC 78 | Singapore | Cited for guiding principles on determining the existence of an oral agreement. |
Xia Zheng v Lee King Anne | High Court | Yes | [2024] SGHC 253 | Singapore | Cited to highlight that pure assertions in pleadings are insufficient to prove oral agreements without objective evidence. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Securities and Futures Act | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Investment Agreement
- Capital Guarantee
- Gapped Fund
- Recovery Period
- Profit Sharing
- Accredited Investor
15.2 Keywords
- contract
- investment
- breach
- misrepresentation
- forex
- trading
16. Subjects
- Contract Law
- Investment Law
- Breach of Contract
- Misrepresentation
17. Areas of Law
- Contract Law
- Misrepresentation