Lam Kuet Keng Steven John

Lam Kuet Keng Steven John is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in security of payment and adjudication. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Total failure of consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Alternative Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lam Kuet Keng Steven John has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Templars Law LLC	7 cases	100% of cases	Oan Chim Seng v Leong Kai Rui: Breach of Oral Investment Agreement & Misrepresentation(Oct 2024) Sahara Energy v Chu Said Thong: Breach of Employment Agreements and Video Link Evidence(Dec 2020) RJC Resource v Koh Lee Hoo: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Contractual Construction in Sand Supply Dispute(Dec 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lam Kuet Keng Steven John's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Neutral	110.0 parties avg	10.0	14%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lam Kuet Keng Steven John's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,097,399.24	1,699,133.083 cases	3
USD	600,000.00	600,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Oan Chim Seng v Leong Kai Rui: Breach of Oral Investment Agreement & Misrepresentation 22 Oct 2024 Oan Chim Seng (Claimant)Won	22 Oct 2024	Oan Chim Seng (Claimant): Claim AllowedClaim allowed for $4,700,524.24 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Sahara Energy v Chu Said Thong: Breach of Employment Agreements and Video Link Evidence 08 Dec 2020 Jo Choon Ho (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Won	08 Dec 2020	Jo Choon Ho (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Application dismissedThe application by Sahara for video link evidence was dismissed, a favorable outcome for Jo. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	RJC Resource v Koh Lee Hoo: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Contractual Construction in Sand Supply Dispute 27 Dec 2018 Ng Swee How (Plaintiff)Partial	27 Dec 2018	Ng Swee How (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentPartial judgment as the director and shareholder of RJC Resource Pte Ltd. Judgment for the sum of US$300,000 to be reimbursed by the defendant pursuant to clause 8 of the 31 May 2013 Agreement, with interest to run on this judgment sum at 5.33% from the date of the writ.
4	Tang Ying v Chen Mingliang: Mareva Injunction, Misrepresentation & Fiduciary Duty 11 Oct 2018 Niu Liming (Defendant)Neutral	11 Oct 2018	Niu Liming (Defendant): NeutralThe judgment does not specify an outcome for this party.
5	Hauslab Design & Build Pte Ltd v Vinod Kumar Ramgopal Didwania: Building and Construction Dispute over Payment Claim 10 Oct 2016 Vinod Kumar Ramgopal Didwania (Defendant)Lost	10 Oct 2016	Vinod Kumar Ramgopal Didwania (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendant's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed, and the sum of $396,875 paid into court was released to the plaintiff. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Lau Fook Hoong Adam v GTH Engineering: Challenging Adjudication Jurisdiction Under SOPA 19 Aug 2015 GTH Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Aug 2015	GTH Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff's application.
7	Lau Fook Hoong Adam v GTH Engineering: SOPA & Validity of Payment Claims After Final Claim 24 May 2015 GTH Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	24 May 2015	GTH Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's application.