Public Prosecutor v Iswan bin Ali: Trafficking Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act

In Public Prosecutor v Iswan bin Ali, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore convicted Iswan bin Ali on 6 November 2024 for trafficking diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act. Iswan was found to be in possession of 51.41g of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking. The court determined that Iswan was not a 'mere courier' under the law because he sourced the drugs and had the ability to set the price. Consequently, the court imposed the mandatory death penalty.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Iswan was found not to be a courier and was sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Iswan bin Ali was convicted of trafficking diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The court found he was not a 'mere courier' and sentenced him to death.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyConvictionWon
Hon Yi of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Yeo Zhen Xiong of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Ariel Tan Hui Ru of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Iswan bin AliDefendantIndividualDeath PenaltyLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Dedar Singh GillJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Hon YiAttorney-General’s Chambers
Yeo Zhen XiongAttorney-General’s Chambers
Ariel Tan Hui RuAttorney-General’s Chambers
Elengovan s/o V KrishnanElengovan Chambers
Wong Hong Weng StephenMatthew Chiong Partnership

4. Facts

  1. Iswan was found in possession of 51.41g of diamorphine.
  2. Iswan sourced the drugs from his supplier, Joe Cartel.
  3. Iswan had the ability to determine the price Zahari paid for the drugs.
  4. Zahari asked Iswan if he had a contact for the purchase of “panas”.
  5. Iswan told Zahari that his supplier only sold a minimum of five “batus” of “panas”.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Iswan bin Ali, Criminal Case No 4 of 2024, [2024] SGHC 284

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Iswan bin Ali trafficked drugs at Pipit Road.
Court found 51.41g of diamorphine in Iswan’s possession for trafficking.
Charge against Iswan altered under s 128(1) of the CPC.
Further submissions from Defence and Prosecution on whether Iswan was a courier.
Iswan convicted of altered charge and sentenced to death.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Drug Trafficking
    • Outcome: The court convicted Iswan of drug trafficking.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2018] 1 SLR 449
      • [2015] 1 SLR 834
      • [2017] 1 SLR 10
  2. Whether Iswan was a 'mere courier' under s 33B of the Misuse of Drugs Act
    • Outcome: The court found that Iswan was not a 'mere courier' because he sourced the drugs and had the ability to set the price.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2018] 1 SLR 449
      • [2015] 1 SLR 834
      • [2017] 1 SLR 10

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Conviction
  2. Mandatory Death Penalty

9. Cause of Actions

  • Drug Trafficking

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Zainudin bin Mohamed v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2018] 1 SLR 449SingaporeCited for the definition of a 'mere courier' under s 33B of the MDA and the requirements to satisfy that definition.
Public Prosecutor v Chum Tat Suan and anotherCourt of AppealYes[2015] 1 SLR 834SingaporeCited for the principle that the definition of a courier is tightly defined and interpreted narrowly.
Public Prosecutor v Abdul Haleem bin Abdul Karim and anotherHigh CourtYes[2013] 3 SLR 734SingaporeCited regarding incidental act of storage or safekeeping by the accused person in the course of transporting, sending or delivering the drugs will not take him outside the definition of a courier
Rosman bin Abdullah v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2017] 1 SLR 10SingaporeCited to support the finding that the sourcing of drugs takes one out of the definition of a courier.
Public Prosecutor v Iswan bin AliHigh CourtYes[2024] SGHC 239SingaporeThe judgment refers to the findings in this earlier judgment regarding the facts of the case and the alteration of the charge.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 5(1)(a)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 5(2)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 33(1)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 33BSingapore
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) s 128(1)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code s 227(3)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Courier
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Sourcing of Drugs
  • Certificate of Substantive Assistance

15.2 Keywords

  • Drug Trafficking
  • Diamorphine
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Death Penalty
  • Courier

17. Areas of Law

Area NameRelevance Score
Criminal Law95
Misuse of Drugs Act95
Sentencing90

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Sentencing