Lim Swee Joo v Nan Bei Dou Mu Gong: Breach of Oral Loan Agreement for Temple Funding
In the case of Lim Swee Joo v Nan Bei Dou Mu Gong and Goh Joo Heng, heard in the General Division of the High Court of Singapore on 5 February 2024, Plaintiff Lim Swee Joo claimed $1,011,295.95 for loans allegedly made to the First Defendant, Nan Bei Dou Mu Gong, a temple, based on an oral agreement. The Second Defendant, Goh Joo Heng, purportedly entered into the agreement on behalf of the First Defendant. The court found that the Plaintiff had loaned the First Defendant the sum of $1,011,295.95 and that the First Defendant is required to repay this sum. The court dismissed the claims against the Second Defendant.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court1.2 Outcome
Judgment for Plaintiff
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Plaintiff Lim Swee Joo sues Nan Bei Dou Mu Gong for breach of an oral loan agreement. The court found in favor of the Plaintiff.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lim Swee Joo | Plaintiff | Individual | Judgment for Plaintiff | Won | |
Nan Bei Dou Mu Gong | Defendant | Association | Claim Dismissed | Lost | |
Goh Joo Heng | Defendant | Individual | Claim Dismissed | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Chan Seng Onn | Senior Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Plaintiff claimed $1,011,295.95 for purported loans to the First Defendant, a temple.
- The claim hinged on an alleged oral loan agreement between the Plaintiff and the Second Defendant on behalf of the First Defendant.
- The Defendants denied any agreement to extend loans, claiming the moneys were donations.
- The First Defendant was registered as a society on 19 September 2016.
- The Plaintiff was the former chairman of the First Defendant from 2016 to 2018.
- The Second Defendant was a committee member of the First Defendant.
- The First Defendant's audited financial statement for the financial year ending on 30 June 2017 was prepared.
- The First Defendant's Annual General Meeting was held on 6 December 2018.
5. Formal Citations
- Lim Swee Joo v Nan Bei Dou Mu Gong and another, Suit No 6 of 2022, [2024] SGHC 33
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
First Defendant registered as a society under the Societies Act | |
First Defendant's Annual General Meeting held | |
Writ issued | |
Trial began | |
Trial | |
Trial | |
Trial | |
Trial | |
Trial | |
Trial | |
Trial | |
Trial | |
Trial | |
Trial | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Contract
- Outcome: The court found that the First Defendant breached the oral loan agreement.
- Category: Substantive
- Formation of Contract
- Outcome: The court found that there was no valid and enforceable oral agreement between the parties.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Certainty of terms
- Proof of Evidence
- Outcome: The court assessed whether the evidence showed that it was more likely than not that the moneys extended to the First Defendant were not gifts or donations but were given in the form of loans.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Onus of proof
- Unjust Enrichment
- Outcome: The court did not rule on this issue as it found the Plaintiff had made out its claim in debt.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Monetary Damages
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
- Unjust Enrichment
- Breach of Warranty of Authority
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT Bayan Resources TBK and another v BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd and another | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2019] 1 SLR 30 | Singapore | Cited to establish that there is no presumption that an obligation to repay arises from mere receipt of a sum of money. |
Tan Chin Hock v Teo Cher Koon and another and another appeal | Unknown | Yes | [2022] 2 SLR 314 | Singapore | Cited to establish that there is no presumption that an obligation to repay arises from mere receipt of a sum of money. |
Seldon v Davidson | Unknown | Yes | [1968] 1 WLR 1083 | England and Wales | Cited as an example of a case that was wrongly decided, regarding the presumption of an implied obligation to repay money. |
Dynasty Line Limited (in liquidation) v Sukamto Sia and another and another appeal | Unknown | Yes | [2014] 3 SLR 277 | Singapore | Cited regarding the issue of vagueness and uncertainty in contract terms. |
T2 Networks Pte Ltd v Nasioncom Sdn Bhd | Unknown | Yes | [2008] 1 SLR(R) 1 | Singapore | Cited regarding the issue of vagueness and uncertainty in contract terms. |
Siemens Industry Software Pte Ltd v Lion Global Offshore Pte Ltd | High Court | Yes | [2014] SGHC 251 | Singapore | Cited regarding the precision expected in drafting agreements, particularly in commercial contexts. |
Tay Eng Chuan v Ace Insurance Ltd | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2008] 4 SLR(R) 95 | Singapore | Cited regarding the application of the contra proferentem rule in interpreting written contracts. |
Tam Wing Chuen v Bank of Credit and Commerce Hong Kong Ltd | Unknown | Yes | [1996] 2 BCLC 69 | Hong Kong | Cited regarding the application of the contra proferentem rule. |
Ang Boon Tian v Jervois Pte Ltd and another | High Court | Yes | [2022] SGHC 104 | Singapore | Cited regarding the principle that money lent is repayable on demand unless otherwise agreed. |
Quah Poh Hoe Peter v Probo Pacific Leasing Pte Ltd | Unknown | Yes | [1992] 3 SLR(R) 400 | Singapore | Cited regarding the liability of an agent acting for a non-existent principal. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Societies Act (Cap 311, 2014 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Evidence Act 1893 (2020 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Oral Agreement
- Loan Acknowledgment
- Transaction Details
- Audited Financial Statements
- Kew Ong Yah
- Donations
- Loans
15.2 Keywords
- contract
- loan
- temple
- oral agreement
- societies act
- singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Breach of Contract | 75 |
Contract Law | 70 |
Unjust Enrichment | 60 |
Evidence | 50 |
Estoppel | 30 |
Agency Law | 25 |
Warranty of Authority | 20 |
16. Subjects
- Contract Law
- Breach of Contract
- Loans
- Societies
- Temples