Too Xing Ji

Too Xing Ji is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and judicial review. Their track record shows a 21.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Too Xing Ji has demonstrated expertise across 52 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	9 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranty of Authority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mutual Legal Assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Leave	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Leave to commence judicial review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Courier	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences relating to race	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Too Xing Ji has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Too Xing Ji has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
BMS Law LLC	9 cases	64% of cases	Han Li Ying v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Conditional Warning for Contempt of Court(May 2023) Teo Chu Ha v Public Prosecutor: Corruption & CDSA Offences in Seagate Tender Case(May 2023) Pannir Selvam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of PP's Decision on Substantive Assistance under Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2022)
Too Xing Ji LLC	2 cases	14% of cases	Subhas Govin Prabhakar Nair v Public Prosecutor: Promoting Enmity Between Racial and Religious Groups(Feb 2025) Lim Swee Joo v Nan Bei Dou Mu Gong: Breach of Oral Loan Agreement for Temple Funding(Feb 2024)
Bachoo Mohan Singh Law Practice	2 cases	14% of cases	Legis Point LLC v Tay Choon Ai: Dispute over Legal Fee Agreement and Interpretation of 'Hard Cap' Clause(Dec 2017) K Saravanan Kuppusamy v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Abetting Drug Offences under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2016)
Veritas Law Corporation	1 cases	7% of cases	PP v Teo Chu Ha: Corruption, Prevention of Corruption Act, Gratification, Seagate, Biforst(Aug 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Too Xing Ji's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	82.1 parties avg	2.1	57%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	7%
Partial	22.7 parties avg	2.7	14%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	21%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Too Xing Ji's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(57%)	57%
Neutral	1(7%)	7%
Partial	2(14%)	14%
Won	3(21%)	21%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	10,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Subhas Govin Prabhakar Nair v Public Prosecutor: Promoting Enmity Between Racial and Religious Groups 04 Feb 2025 Subhas Govin Prabhakar Nair (Appellant)Lost	04 Feb 2025	Subhas Govin Prabhakar Nair (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Appellant's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
2	Lim Swee Joo v Nan Bei Dou Mu Gong: Breach of Oral Loan Agreement for Temple Funding 04 Feb 2024 Goh Joo Heng (Defendant)Won	04 Feb 2024	Goh Joo Heng (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff’s claim against the Second Defendant is dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Han Li Ying v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Conditional Warning for Contempt of Court 11 May 2023 Han Li Ying, Kirsten (Applicant)Lost	11 May 2023	Han Li Ying, Kirsten (Applicant): Application DismissedThe application for judicial review was dismissed.
4	Teo Chu Ha v Public Prosecutor: Corruption & CDSA Offences in Seagate Tender Case 08 May 2023 Judy Teo Suya Bik (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	08 May 2023	Judy Teo Suya Bik (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against conviction dismissed. Sentence adjusted to 56 months' imprisonment.
5	Pannir Selvam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of PP's Decision on Substantive Assistance under Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Apr 2022 Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman (Appellant)Lost	20 Apr 2022	Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal was dismissed.
6	Pang Ah San v Singapore Medical Council: Doctor's Disciplinary Appeal for Improper Conduct Dismissed 11 May 2021 Pang Ah San (Appellant)Lost	11 May 2021	Pang Ah San (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Dr. Pang ordered to pay the SMC's costs fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Pannir Selvam v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision on Certificate of Substantive Assistance 23 Apr 2020 Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman (Applicant)Lost	23 Apr 2020	Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to commence judicial review proceedings was dismissed.
8	Mohammad Farid v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking Diamorphine & Courier Status under Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Mar 2020 Ranjit Singh Gill Manjeet Singh (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	25 Mar 2020	Ranjit Singh Gill Manjeet Singh (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed.
9	Lim Chit Foo v Public Prosecutor: Legality of Multiple Trials & Standing Down Charges in IRAS PIC Scheme Fraud 18 Nov 2019 Lim Chit Foo (Applicant)Partial	18 Nov 2019	Lim Chit Foo (Applicant): Application partially dismissedThe application for leave to state a case on the issue of bail was dismissed. The court determined that the statutory basis for standing down charges is Section 238 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
10	Pannir Selvam v Attorney-General: Application for Discovery of Documents in Judicial Review Proceedings 16 Sep 2019 Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman (Applicant)Lost	16 Sep 2019	Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for discovery and leave to serve interrogatories dismissed.
11	Ranjit Singh Gill v Public Prosecutor: Remittal Findings on Accused's Instructions 18 Mar 2019 Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh (Appellant)Neutral	18 Mar 2019	Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh (Appellant): Case remitted to trial judgeThe matter was remitted to the trial judge to take additional evidence on whether the accused’s case at trial was presented in accordance with his instructions.
12	Legis Point LLC v Tay Choon Ai: Dispute over Legal Fee Agreement and Interpretation of 'Hard Cap' Clause 27 Dec 2017 Tay Choon Ai (Defendant)Won	27 Dec 2017	Tay Choon Ai (Defendant): Application DismissedThe Plaintiff's application was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	K Saravanan Kuppusamy v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Abetting Drug Offences under the Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Aug 2016 K Saravanan Kuppusamy (Appellant)Won	18 Aug 2016	K Saravanan Kuppusamy (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed and the term of imprisonment was reduced from 7 years to 4.5 years.
14	PP v Teo Chu Ha: Corruption, Prevention of Corruption Act, Gratification, Seagate, Biforst 26 Aug 2014 Teo Chu Ha (Respondent)Lost	26 Aug 2014	Teo Chu Ha (Respondent): ConvictionThe court held that it is not necessary for the Prosecution to prove that the consideration was inadequate or that the transaction was a sham before an offence under s 6 of the Act is made out.