WTB v WTC: Application for Second Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
In the Family Justice Courts of Singapore, WTB applied against WTC for a second extension of time to file a notice of appeal regarding the District Judge's orders on ancillary matters, specifically the division of matrimonial assets and child maintenance, following their divorce. Choo Han Teck J dismissed the application, citing unreasonable delay and slim prospects of success on appeal. The court ordered the Applicant to pay $500 in costs to the Respondent.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court (Family Division)1.2 Outcome
Application dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Family
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The court considered an application for a second extension of time to file a notice of appeal in a divorce case, ultimately dismissing the application due to unreasonable delay and poor prospects of success.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Tan Yee Tat | Yeo & Associates LLC |
Alvina Logan | Yeo & Associates LLC |
4. Facts
- The parties obtained a final divorce judgment on 31 May 2023.
- The Applicant Husband wanted to appeal against the District Judge’s orders on ancillary matters.
- The Applicant failed to file the Notice of Appeal within the stipulated time.
- The Applicant applied for an extension of time, which was granted, but failed to comply again.
- The Applicant sought a second extension of time, claiming he did not know how to file a Notice of Appeal.
- The Applicant intended to appeal against the valuation of matrimonial assets and child maintenance.
- The basis for his appeal rested on an accountant’s report showing the company is worth zero dollars.
5. Formal Citations
- WTB v WTC, Originating Summons No 10 of 2023, [2024] SGHCF 1
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
District Judge's orders handed down | |
Final judgment of divorce obtained | |
Applicant applied for an extension of time | |
Leave to appeal granted within 14 days | |
Judgment reserved | |
Judgment issued |
7. Legal Issues
- Extension of time to file a notice of appeal
- Outcome: The court dismissed the application for a second extension of time.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Unreasonable delay
- Prospects of appeal
8. Remedies Sought
- Extension of time to file a notice of appeal
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Appeals
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Extension of time
- Notice of appeal
- Matrimonial assets
- Child maintenance
- Unreasonable delay
- Prospects of appeal
15.2 Keywords
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Appeal
- Extension of Time
- Matrimonial Assets
- Child Maintenance
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Family Law | 95 |
Division of Matrimonial Assets | 85 |
Maintenance | 70 |
Children's Welfare | 60 |
Child Support | 60 |
Extension of Time | 50 |
Civil Procedure | 40 |
Legal Aid | 30 |
Wills and Probate | 5 |
16. Subjects
- Family Law
- Civil Procedure