A. Ang, Seah & Hoe
A. Ang, Seah & Hoe is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2021. The firm has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and legal malpractice. Their track record shows a 70.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.
Areas of Practice and Expertise
A. Ang, Seah & Hoe has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and legal malpractice.
Practice Area | Case Volume |
---|---|
Breach of Contract | 4 cases |
Legal Malpractice | 2 cases |
Employment Law | 2 cases |
Property Law | 2 cases |
Construction Law | 1 cases |
Copyrights | 1 cases |
Unfair Competition | 1 cases |
Landlord and Tenant Law | 1 cases |
Building and Construction Contracts | 1 cases |
Negligence | 1 cases |
Legal Team and Representation
A. Ang, Seah & Hoe has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 4 cases.
Counsel Name | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Ang Cheng Ann Alfonso | 4 cases |
Koh Tien Hua | 2 cases |
Cheah Shu Xian | 2 cases |
Alfonso Ang | 2 cases |
Ch’ng Chin Leong James | 2 cases |
Nicholas Chan | 1 cases |
Nicholas Chan Wai-Kuin | 1 cases |
Tan Sher Meen | 1 cases |
Anneson Neo | 1 cases |
Alfonso Ang Cheng Ann | 1 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of A. Ang, Seah & Hoe's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.0
- Complex Cases
- 2 (20%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 73.1 parties avg |
Dismissed | 13.0 parties avg |
Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2000 | 32.6 parties avg |
2002 | 13.0 parties avg |
2008 | 12.0 parties avg |
2009 | 22.0 parties avg |
2018 | 12.0 parties avg |
2021 | 23.4 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of A. Ang, Seah & Hoe's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 7(70.0%) |
Dismissed | 1(10.0%) |
Lost | 1(10.0%) |
Partial | 1(10.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 72727.277 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2000 | 012 12 |
2002 | 01 1 |
2008 | 01 1 |
2009 | 011 11 |
2018 | 01 1 |
2021 | 02 2 |
Represented Parties
List of parties represented by A. Ang, Seah & Hoe in various cases
Party Name | Cases |
---|---|
Methodist Welfare ServicesRespondent, Defendant Won (2) | 2 cases |
Chip Thye Enterprises (Pte) LtdRespondent, Defendant Lost (1)Won (1) | 2 cases |
FUJIFILM Business Innovation Asia Pacific Pte LtdPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
FUJIFILM Business Innovation CorpPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
FUJIFILM Business Innovation Singapore Pte LtdPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
Bird & Bird ATMD LLPDefendant Won (1) | 1 case |
Boey Swee SiangDefendant Won (1) | 1 case |
Ascentsia Law CorpDefendant Won (1) | 1 case |
Cattel Engineering Pte LtdDefendant Partial (1) | 1 case |
Soh Kim Lian FlorenceDefendant Dismissed (1) | 1 case |
Soo Nam YuenPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
Case History
Displaying all 10 cases
Case |
---|
29 Nov 2021 FUJIFILM Business Innovation Asia Pacific Pte LtdWon FUJIFILM Business Innovation CorpWon FUJIFILM Business Innovation Singapore Pte LtdWon |
11 Oct 2021 Bird & Bird ATMD LLPWon Boey Swee SiangWon |
16 Aug 2018 Ascentsia Law CorpWon |
10 Sep 2009 Cattel Engineering Pte LtdPartial |
01 Jun 2009 Methodist Welfare ServicesWon |
19 Oct 2008 Methodist Welfare ServicesWon |
09 Oct 2002 Soh Kim Lian FlorenceDismissed |
15 Nov 2000 Soo Nam YuenWon |
26 Oct 2000 Chip Thye Enterprises (Pte) LtdLost |
30 Mar 2000 Chip Thye Enterprises (Pte) LtdWon |