Desin Construction v Cattel Engineering: Construction Contract Dispute over Payment for Diversion Project
In a civil case before the High Court of Singapore on 11 September 2009, Desin Construction Pte Ltd sued Cattel Engineering Pte Ltd for breach of contract, seeking payment for works completed on a construction project. Desin Construction claimed that Cattel Engineering failed to make full payment for the project. Cattel Engineering counterclaimed for overpayment and rectification costs due to Desin Construction's alleged failure to perform contractual obligations and rectify defects. The court dismissed Desin Construction's claim and Cattel Engineering's counterclaim for overpayment, but allowed Cattel Engineering's counterclaim for rectification costs.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs; Defendant's counterclaim for overpayment dismissed with costs; Judgment for Defendant's counterclaim for rectification costs.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment reserved
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
A dispute over a construction contract between Desin Construction and Cattel Engineering regarding payment for a diversion project. The court dismissed Desin's claim and allowed Cattel's counterclaim for rectification costs.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Desin Construction Pte Ltd | Plaintiff | Corporation | Claim dismissed with costs | Lost | |
Cattel Engineering Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Counterclaim for overpayment dismissed with costs | Partial |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Kan Ting Chiu | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Pavan Kumar Ratty | P K Ratty & Partners |
Ang Cheng Ann Alfonso | A. Ang, Seah & Hoe |
4. Facts
- Desin Construction and Cattel Engineering entered into a contract for a construction project named “Diversion of Private Services at Jurong Island Highway (Phase 2) – Civil”.
- Desin Construction submitted a quotation of $11,512,000.00 to Cattel Engineering, which was accepted.
- No formal agreement was executed, nor was there any exchange of correspondence to record terms regarding the execution of and payment for the works.
- Desin Construction claimed that it had completed the project to the satisfaction of Cattel Engineering but did not receive full payment.
- Cattel Engineering argued that payments were to be made only when work carried out by Desin Construction was completed and approved.
- Cattel Engineering counterclaimed that it had overpaid Desin Construction and incurred further costs in rectifying Desin Construction’s works.
- The court found that Desin Construction did not prove it was entitled to the payment claimed.
5. Formal Citations
- Desin Construction Pte Ltd v Cattel Engineering Pte Ltd, Suit 311/2008, [2009] SGHC 203
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Final inspection of the contracted works | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Contract
- Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for breach of contract.
- Category: Substantive
- Quantum Meruit
- Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for payment in quantum meruit.
- Category: Substantive
- Rectification Costs
- Outcome: The court allowed the defendant's counterclaim for rectification costs in the sum of $401,913.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Monetary Damages
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
- Quantum Meruit
10. Practice Areas
- Construction Law
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Construction
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keating on Construction Contracts | N/A | Yes | Keating on Construction Contracts 8th Edition | N/A | Cited regarding the employer's obligation to pay the contractor in a lump-sum contract despite a few defects and omissions, subject to a deduction for the defects. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Construction project
- Diversion of Private Services
- Jurong Island Highway
- Contract sum
- Rectification costs
- Overpayment
- Substantial completion
- Lump sum contract
15.2 Keywords
- construction contract
- payment dispute
- rectification costs
- overpayment
- Singapore High Court
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Construction Law | 95 |
Building and Construction Contracts | 90 |
Contract Law | 80 |
Breach of Contract | 70 |
Damages | 50 |
Quantum meruit | 40 |
16. Subjects
- Construction Dispute
- Contract Law