Arul Chew & Partners

Arul Chew & Partners is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The firm has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 7 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international arbitration. Their track record shows a 29.2% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 20.8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Arul Chew & Partners has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	8 cases	15.1% of total caseload	Experienced56.92% relevance score	Arul Chew & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 15.1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	6 cases	11.3% of total caseload	General Practice37.50% relevance score	Arul Chew & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11.3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	4 cases	7.5% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Arul Chew & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7.5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	7.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83.57% relevance score	Arul Chew & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7.5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	5.7% of total caseload	Experienced57.50% relevance score	Arul Chew & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.7% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	General Practice32.50% relevance score	Arul Chew & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Arul Chew & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Arul Chew & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Experienced53.33% relevance score	Arul Chew & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Arul Chew & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Arul Chew & Partners has 7 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 19 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Andre Arul	19 cases	79.2% of firm's cases	2018 sghc 157(Jul 2018) 2010 sghc 323(Oct 2010) 2010 sgca 2(Jan 2010)
Arul Andre Ravindran Saravanapavan	4 cases	16.7% of firm's cases	2024 sghc 207(Aug 2024) 2023 sghc 335(Nov 2023) 2019 sgca 33(May 2019)
Adrian Kho Ngiat Sun	2 cases	8.3% of firm's cases	2024 sghc 207(Aug 2024) 2023 sghc 335(Nov 2023)
Renaro Daniel Ezra Bunyamin	2 cases	8.3% of firm's cases	2019 sgca 33(May 2019) 2018 sghc 78(Apr 2018)
Ling Leong Hui	1 cases	4.2% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 111(Jun 2006)
Ezra Daniel Renaro	1 cases	4.2% of firm's cases	2018 sghc 157(Jul 2018)
Arul Andre	1 cases	4.2% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 111(Jun 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Arul Chew & Partners's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 5 (20.8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	143.1 parties avg	3.1	58.3%
Won	73.4 parties avg	3.4	29.2%
Partial	26.3 parties avg	6.3	8.3%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	4.2%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2001	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	55.3 parties avg	5.3
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Arul Chew & Partners's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	14(58.3%)	58.3%
Won	7(29.2%)	29.2%
Partial	2(8.3%)	8.3%
Neutral	1(4.2%)	4.2%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	73670946.54	2728553.5815 cases	15
USD	600200.00	600200.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2001	031 31	Lost: 3 cases (9.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (3.2%)
2002	0111 111	Lost: 1 cases (0.9%) Partial: 1 cases (0.9%) Won: 1 cases (0.9%)
2003	0113 113	Lost: 1 cases (0.9%) Partial: 1 cases (0.9%) Won: 3 cases (2.7%)
2006	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Arul Chew & Partners in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Won Siok WanDefendant, Defendant, Appellant, Appellant, Defendant Won (2)Lost (2)	Defendant, Defendant, Appellant, Appellant, Defendant	4 cases	Won (2)Lost (2)
Mak-Levrion Kah Kay Natasha @ Mai Jiaqi NatashaClaimant, Claimant, Respondent Won (1)Lost (1)	Claimant, Claimant, Respondent	2 cases	Won (1)Lost (1)
Rakna Arakshaka Lanka LtdAppellant, Plaintiff Won (1)Lost (1)	Appellant, Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (1)Lost (1)
Ong Jane RebeccaPlaintiff Won (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (2)
Datuk Hamzah Bin Mohd NoorAppellant, Plaintiff Lost (2)	Appellant, Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
Sinolanka Hotels & Spa (Private) LimitedPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Premiere Visione Resources Inc Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Loh Chong Yong ThomasRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Sukanda SutisnaDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Low Ah CheowPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Ng Bee EngPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Ng Jian WenPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Ng Puay GuanPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Nicholas Ng Puay GuanPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Chang Chi LanDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Moey Keng WengDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Malcolm Peter James Lynhurst ThwaitesDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Thwaites Racing Pte LtdDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Korea Jonmyong Trading CoPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Andre Ravindran S ArulRespondent, Plaintiff Neutral (1)	Respondent, Plaintiff	1 case	Neutral (1)
Ang Ah Lah Richard alias Richard Ang Ah LahPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Richard Ang Ah LahPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Arul ChandranPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)