Bernard & Rada Law Corporation
Bernard & Rada Law Corporation is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2018. The firm has handled 27 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in family law and divorce. Their track record shows a 17.9% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 11 complex cases, representing 40.7% of their total caseload.
Areas of Practice and Expertise
Bernard & Rada Law Corporation has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and corporate law.
Practice Area | Case Volume |
---|---|
Civil Practice | 5 cases |
Corporate Law | 5 cases |
Corporate Litigation | 5 cases |
Breach of Contract | 4 cases |
Family Law | 4 cases |
Property Law | 4 cases |
Banking and Finance | 2 cases |
Divorce | 2 cases |
Bankruptcy | 2 cases |
Chancery and Equity | 2 cases |
Legal Team and Representation
Bernard & Rada Law Corporation has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 18 cases.
Counsel Name | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Foo Soon Yien | 18 cases |
Daniel Tay | 3 cases |
Poon Pui Yee | 2 cases |
Muthu Kumaran | 2 cases |
Bernard Stanley Doray | 1 cases |
Faizal Shah | 1 cases |
Daniel Loh | 1 cases |
Thaddeus Oh | 1 cases |
Liao Ruiyi | 1 cases |
Ponnampalam Sivakumar | 1 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Bernard & Rada Law Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.3
- Complex Cases
- 11 (40.7%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 173.3 parties avg |
Won | 55.6 parties avg |
Partial | 34.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 25.0 parties avg |
Dismissed | 15.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 44.2 parties avg |
2009 | 36.1 parties avg |
2010 | 12.0 parties avg |
2011 | 53.1 parties avg |
2012 | 13.0 parties avg |
2013 | 12.0 parties avg |
2014 | 32.0 parties avg |
2015 | 35.0 parties avg |
2017 | 42.8 parties avg |
2018 | 25.5 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Bernard & Rada Law Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 17(60.7%) |
Won | 5(17.9%) |
Partial | 3(10.7%) |
Neutral | 2(7.1%) |
Dismissed | 1(3.6%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 8603.4414 cases |
USD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 031 31 |
2009 | 0121 121 |
2010 | 01 1 |
2011 | 032 32 |
2012 | 01 1 |
2013 | 01 1 |
2014 | 03 3 |
2015 | 0111 111 |
2017 | 031 31 |
2018 | 02 2 |
Represented Parties
List of parties represented by Bernard & Rada Law Corporation in various cases
Party Name | Cases |
---|---|
Lew Kiat BengAppellant, Defendant, Respondent Won (2)Lost (1)Partial (1) | 4 cases |
UDAAppellant Lost (1)Neutral (1) | 2 cases |
Low Hian ChorRespondent, Plaintiff Lost (1)Partial (1) | 2 cases |
Lim Lye HiangAppellant Lost (2) | 2 cases |
Hiap Seng & Co Pte LtdDefendant, Respondent Won (1)Neutral (1) | 2 cases |
The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3563Plaintiff, Appellant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Singapore Recreation ClubDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Liberty Insurance Pte LtdRespondent Lost (1) | 1 case |
UAMPlaintiff Lost (1) | 1 case |
Quek Hung HeongDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Agri-Commodity Resources Pte LtdDefendant Dismissed (1) | 1 case |
Tan Ling Ling, NatalieDefendant Dismissed (1) | 1 case |
Tan Tjo TekDefendant Dismissed (1) | 1 case |
Choo Wooi ChinRespondent Won (1) | 1 case |
Lim Ka Poh (trading as Mysteel Engineering Contractor)Respondent Won (1) | 1 case |
Sheagar s/o T M VelooAppellant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Zheng Zhuan YaoPlaintiff Lost (1) | 1 case |
Seet PohPetitioner, Appellant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Foo Song MeeAppellant Won (1) | 1 case |
Ong Chow Hong (alias Ong Chaw Ping)Appellant, Respondent Lost (1) | 1 case |
Lau Chin HuDefendant Won (1) | 1 case |
Law Chin ChaiDefendant Won (1) | 1 case |
Winstant Holding Pte LtdDefendant Won (1) | 1 case |
Inphosoft Pte LtdPlaintiff Partial (1) | 1 case |
Lee Kwee SiongDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Vita Health Laboratories Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1) | 1 case |
Vita Life Sciences LimitedPlaintiff Lost (1) | 1 case |
Ding Leng KongDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Rahimah Binti Haji HashimPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
Woon Tek SengPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
Case History
Displaying all 27 cases
Case |
---|
01 May 2018 The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3563Lost |
23 Apr 2018 UDALost |
19 Dec 2017 Singapore Recreation ClubLost |
27 Jun 2017 UDANeutral |
22 May 2017 Liberty Insurance Pte LtdLost |
12 Apr 2017 UAMLost |
30 Aug 2015 Quek Hung HeongLost |
03 Aug 2015 Agri-Commodity Resources Pte LtdDismissed Tan Ling Ling, NatalieDismissed Tan Tjo TekDismissed |
05 Apr 2015 Choo Wooi ChinWon Lim Ka Poh (trading as Mysteel Engineering Contractor)Won |
18 May 2014 Sheagar s/o T M VelooLost |
28 Apr 2014 Zheng Zhuan YaoLost |
16 Apr 2014 Seet PohLost |
30 Jan 2013 Low Hian ChorLost |
12 Jan 2012 Low Hian ChorPartial |
20 Nov 2011 Lew Kiat BengWon |
01 Nov 2011 Lim Lye HiangLost |
05 Sep 2011 Foo Song MeeWon |
01 Jun 2011 Lew Kiat BengLost |
12 Apr 2011 Ong Chow Hong (alias Ong Chaw Ping)Lost |
10 Oct 2010 Lim Lye HiangLost |
30 Sep 2009 Hiap Seng & Co Pte LtdWon Lau Chin HuWon Law Chin ChaiWon Lew Kiat BengWon Winstant Holding Pte LtdWon |
29 Sep 2009 Hiap Seng & Co Pte LtdNeutral Lew Kiat BengPartial |
29 Jun 2009 Inphosoft Pte LtdPartial |
20 Jul 2008 Lee Kwee SiongLost |
08 Jun 2008 Vita Health Laboratories Pte LtdLost Vita Life Sciences LimitedLost |
05 May 2008 Ding Leng KongLost |
17 Mar 2008 Rahimah Binti Haji HashimWon Woon Tek SengWon |