Cavenagh Law LLP

Cavenagh Law LLP is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2025. The firm has handled 44 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in international arbitration. Their track record shows a 37.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 14 complex cases, representing 31.8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cavenagh Law LLP has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	20 cases	13.8% of total caseload	Experienced61.01% relevance score	Cavenagh Law LLP has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 20 cases which represents 13.8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	14 cases	9.7% of total caseload	Experienced70.83% relevance score	Cavenagh Law LLP has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 9.7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	10 cases	6.9% of total caseload	General Practice41.84% relevance score	Cavenagh Law LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 6.9% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	8 cases	5.5% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Cavenagh Law LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5.5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	7 cases	4.8% of total caseload	General Practice36.50% relevance score	Cavenagh Law LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4.8% of their total caseload.
Litigation	5 cases	3.4% of total caseload	General Practice33.16% relevance score	Cavenagh Law LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3.4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	5 cases	3.4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76.82% relevance score	Cavenagh Law LLP has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3.4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	3.4% of total caseload	General Practice29.26% relevance score	Cavenagh Law LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3.4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	3.4% of total caseload	General Practice35.20% relevance score	Cavenagh Law LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3.4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	2.8% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	Cavenagh Law LLP has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2.8% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Cavenagh Law LLP has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 9 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Tian Yi	9 cases	20.5% of firm's cases	2020 sgca 67(Jul 2020) 2020 sghci 12(May 2020)
Nish Kumar Shetty	9 cases	20.5% of firm's cases	2025 sghca 1(Jan 2025) 2024 sghci 33(Dec 2024)
Keith Han	7 cases	15.9% of firm's cases	2019 sghc 81(Mar 2019) 2019 sghc 40(Feb 2019) 2019 sghc 39(Feb 2019)
Jordan Tan	6 cases	13.6% of firm's cases	2020 sghc 63(Mar 2020) 2019 sgca 78(Nov 2019)
Jerald Foo	6 cases	13.6% of firm's cases	2021 sghc 53(Mar 2021) 2018 sghci 5(May 2018) 2017 sghci 12(Jan 2018)
Krishna Elan	4 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2025 sghca 1(Jan 2025) 2024 sghc 79(Mar 2024)
Han Guangyuan Keith	4 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2020 sgca 36(Apr 2020) 2020 sgca 7(Feb 2020) 2016 sghc 190(Sep 2016)
Harpreet Singh Nehal	4 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2019 sghc 39(Feb 2019) 2019 sghc 40(Feb 2019) 2017 sgca 59(Oct 2017)
Elan Krishna	3 cases	6.8% of firm's cases	2024 sghcr 10(Sep 2024) 2020 sgca 13(Mar 2020) 2019 sgca 78(Nov 2019)
Harpreet Singh	3 cases	6.8% of firm's cases	2017 sghc 14(Jan 2017) 2016 sghc 159(Aug 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cavenagh Law LLP's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 14 (31.8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	204.0 parties avg	4.0	43.5%
Won	175.2 parties avg	5.2	37.0%
Partial	73.2 parties avg	3.2	15.2%
Neutral	25.0 parties avg	5.0	4.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2015	24.2 parties avg	4.2
2016	54.8 parties avg	4.8
2017	83.7 parties avg	3.7
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	65.6 parties avg	5.6
2020	95.4 parties avg	5.4
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2024	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2025	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cavenagh Law LLP's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	20(43.5%)	43.5%
Won	17(37.0%)	37.0%
Partial	7(15.2%)	15.2%
Neutral	2(4.3%)	4.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1589500	16219.3923 cases	23
USD	6000000	1200000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	01 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	0111 111	Lost: 1 cases (0.9%) Neutral: 1 cases (0.9%) Partial: 1 cases (0.9%)
2016	014 14	Lost: 1 cases (7.1%) Won: 4 cases (28.6%)
2017	0215 215	Lost: 2 cases (0.9%) Partial: 1 cases (0.5%) Won: 5 cases (2.3%)
2018	011 11	Partial: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2019	0411 411	Lost: 4 cases (1.0%) Partial: 1 cases (0.2%) Won: 1 cases (0.2%)
2020	072 72	Lost: 7 cases (9.7%) Won: 2 cases (2.8%)
2021	011 11	Partial: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2022	013 13	Lost: 1 cases (7.7%) Won: 3 cases (23.1%)
2024	031 31	Lost: 3 cases (9.7%) Partial: 1 cases (3.2%)
2025	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Cavenagh Law LLP in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Liberty Sky Investments LimitedAppellant, Plaintiff, Applicant, Respondent, Plaintiff, Respondent, Plaintiff Lost (3)Partial (1)	Appellant, Plaintiff, Applicant, Respondent, Plaintiff, Respondent, Plaintiff	4 cases	Lost (3)Partial (1)
CKGRespondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Respondent Won (2)Partial (1)	Respondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Respondent	3 cases	Won (2)Partial (1)
Clifford Chance Pte LtdRespondent, Defendant, Defendant Partial (1)Lost (1)	Respondent, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Partial (1)Lost (1)
Cosimo BorrelliRespondent, Defendant, Defendant Partial (2)	Respondent, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Partial (2)
Ewe Pang KooiAppellant Lost (2)	Appellant	2 cases	Lost (2)
YCH Distripark Pte LtdApplicant, Appellant, Appellant Lost (1)Won (1)	Applicant, Appellant, Appellant	2 cases	Lost (1)Won (1)
BYLPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
BYMPlaintiff Lost (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Lost (2)
BWGAppellant, Defendant, Defendant, Appellant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant, Defendant, Appellant	2 cases	Lost (2)
MACQUARIE BANK LIMITEDPlaintiff, Defendant, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim Won (1)Partial (1)	Plaintiff, Defendant, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim	2 cases	Won (1)Partial (1)
Liberty Sky Investments LtdApplicant, Plaintiff Won (2)	Applicant, Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (2)
Toyota Tsusho (Malaysia) Sdn BhdPlaintiff Won (2)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (2)
La Dolce Vita Fine Dining Company LimitedRespondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff Won (2)	Respondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (2)
La Dolce Vita Fine Dining Group Holdings LimitedRespondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff Won (2)	Respondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (2)
CHUA PUAY CHOO ALVINNARespondent, Defendant, Defendant Lost (1)Neutral (1)	Respondent, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (1)Neutral (1)
LINCOLN COLLEGIATE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITEDRespondent, Defendant, Defendant Lost (1)Neutral (1)	Respondent, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (1)Neutral (1)
YEO POH SIAHRespondent, Defendant, Defendant Lost (1)Partial (1)	Respondent, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (1)Partial (1)
Australian Executor Trustees LimitedClaimant Lost (1)	Claimant	1 case	Lost (1)
Marketlend Pty LtdClaimant, Defendant in Counterclaim Lost (1)	Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim	1 case	Lost (1)
PT Rajawali Capital InternationalDefendants, Claimants Lost (1)	Defendants, Claimants	1 case	Lost (1)
PT Rajawali CorporaDefendants, Claimants Lost (1)	Defendants, Claimants	1 case	Lost (1)
DJBDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
CIADefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
CIYDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
CFPPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
CFQPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Hyflux Membrane Manufacturing (S) Pte LtdRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Choong Chee HongPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Koh Hoon LyeRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Koh Keng ChewRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Koh Oon BinRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Ian PascoeDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Credit Suisse AGDefendant, Respondent Won (1)	Defendant, Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
PACC Offshore Services Holdings LtdPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Jaswinderpal Singh s/o Bachint SinghDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
ERNEST FERDINAND PEREZ DE LA SALADefendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim Won (1)	Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim	1 case	Won (1)
BBWPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
KOO KHEE CHONGRespondent, Defendant Lost (1)	Respondent, Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Rosman bin AbdullahApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
KHOO KHEE CHONGDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
Chiam Ai ThongOther Neutral (1)	Other	1 case	Neutral (1)
Chiam Toon TauOther Neutral (1)	Other	1 case	Neutral (1)

Case History

Displaying all 44 cases

Case

2025-sghca-1

15 Jan 2025

Clifford Chance Pte LtdPartial

Cosimo BorrelliPartial

2025-sghci-1

07 Jan 2025

Australian Executor Trustees LimitedLost

Marketlend Pty LtdLost

2024-sghci-33

15 Dec 2024

PT Rajawali Capital InternationalLost

PT Rajawali CorporaLost

2024-sghcr-10

01 Sep 2024

DJBLost

2024-sghc-79

18 Mar 2024

Clifford Chance Pte LtdLost

Cosimo BorrelliPartial

2022-sghc-300

01 Dec 2022

Ewe Pang KooiLost

2022-sgcai-6

29 Aug 2022

CKGWon

2022-sgcai-4

07 Apr 2022

CKGWon

2022-sghci-3

10 Feb 2022

CIAWon

2021-sghci-5

17 Jun 2021

CKGPartial

2021-sghc-53

04 Mar 2021

CIYWon

2020-sgca-67

13 Jul 2020

YCH Distripark Pte LtdLost

2020-sghc-143

12 Jul 2020

CFPWon

CFQWon

2020-sghc-122

16 Jun 2020

Hyflux Membrane Manufacturing (S) Pte LtdWon

2020-sghci-12

10 May 2020

BYLLost

BYMLost

2020-sgca-36

15 Apr 2020

BWGLost

2020-sghc-63

29 Mar 2020

Choong Chee HongLost

2020-sghci-6

02 Mar 2020

BYLLost

BYMLost

2020-sgca-13

02 Mar 2020

Ewe Pang KooiLost

2020-sgca-7

09 Feb 2020

Liberty Sky Investments LimitedLost

2019-sgca-78

26 Nov 2019

Koh Hoon LyeLost

Koh Keng ChewLost

Koh Oon BinLost

Lost	Koh Hoon Lye (Respondent): Appeal Allowed AgainstThe independent valuer is to re-value the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group taking into account the discount for lack of control. The independent valuer is free to decide whether the discount for lack of marketability should apply in re-valuing the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group. In the event the independent valuer’s re-valuation of the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group returns a value less than that in its 3 August 2018 report, the respondents are to refund the appellants the difference between the sum that they were bought out with and the re-valued price of their shares in the Samwoh Group.
Lost	Koh Keng Chew (Respondent): Appeal Allowed AgainstThe independent valuer is to re-value the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group taking into account the discount for lack of control. The independent valuer is free to decide whether the discount for lack of marketability should apply in re-valuing the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group. In the event the independent valuer’s re-valuation of the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group returns a value less than that in its 3 August 2018 report, the respondents are to refund the appellants the difference between the sum that they were bought out with and the re-valued price of their shares in the Samwoh Group.
Lost	Koh Oon Bin (Respondent): Appeal Allowed AgainstThe independent valuer is to re-value the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group taking into account the discount for lack of control. The independent valuer is free to decide whether the discount for lack of marketability should apply in re-valuing the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group. In the event the independent valuer’s re-valuation of the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group returns a value less than that in its 3 August 2018 report, the respondents are to refund the appellants the difference between the sum that they were bought out with and the re-valued price of their shares in the Samwoh Group.