Cooma & Rai

Cooma & Rai is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The firm has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 5 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and personal injury. Their track record shows a 30.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 10% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cooma & Rai has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	7 cases	11.7% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Cooma & Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 11.7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	6 cases	10.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.56% relevance score	Cooma & Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10.0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	6 cases	10.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81.25% relevance score	Cooma & Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10.0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	5 cases	8.3% of total caseload	Experienced52.50% relevance score	Cooma & Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8.3% of their total caseload.
Torts	4 cases	6.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77.00% relevance score	Cooma & Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	4 cases	6.7% of total caseload	General Practice42.00% relevance score	Cooma & Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6.7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5.0% of total caseload	General Practice37.50% relevance score	Cooma & Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	5.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78.75% relevance score	Cooma & Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	5.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86.67% relevance score	Cooma & Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	3 cases	5.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Cooma & Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Cooma & Rai has 5 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 12 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mahendra Prasad Rai	12 cases	60.0% of firm's cases	2024 sghc 229(Sep 2024) 2023 sghc 210(Aug 2023) 2022 sghc 120(May 2022)
MP Rai	4 cases	20.0% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 162(Jul 2002) 2000 sghc 190(Sep 2000) 2000 sgca 37(Jul 2000)
Dean Salleh	3 cases	15.0% of firm's cases	2019 sghc 136(May 2019) 2018 sgca 35(Jul 2018) 2017 sgca 35(May 2017)
M P Rai	3 cases	15.0% of firm's cases	2009 sghc 110(May 2009) 2007 sghc 87(May 2007)
Gurcharanjit Singh	2 cases	10.0% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 237(Aug 2001) 2000 sgca 37(Jul 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cooma & Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 2 (10%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	112.6 parties avg	2.6	55.0%
Won	63.8 parties avg	3.8	30.0%
Partial	32.8 parties avg	2.8	15.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cooma & Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	11(55.0%)	55.0%
Won	6(30.0%)	30.0%
Partial	3(15.0%)	15.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	712683.73	41922.5712 cases	12

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Won: 1 cases (4.8%)
2001	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2007	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2018	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2019	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2022	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Cooma & Rai in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Sompo Insurance Singapore Pte LtdRespondent, Applicant, Respondent Lost (1)Won (1)	Respondent, Applicant, Respondent	2 cases	Lost (1)Won (1)
SIM LIAN-KORU BENA JV PTE LTDRespondent, Defendant, Defendant Partial (1)Lost (1)	Respondent, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Partial (1)Lost (1)
Ergo Insurance Pte LtdRespondent Lost (1)Won (1)	Respondent	2 cases	Lost (1)Won (1)
Lonpac Insurance BhdRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
SM Laundry & Linen Pte LtdApplicant, Respondent Won (1)	Applicant, Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Loke Chor KayDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Law Society of SingaporeApplicant Won (1)	Applicant	1 case	Won (1)
Saravanan A/L Subramaniam as dependent of the estate of Lingaswari A/P Koushanan (Deceased)Respondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Big-Foot Logistic Pte LtdRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
MokshaRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Uni-Fruitveg Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ang Kee Huat Charcoal Trader (suing as a firm)Defendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Hua Goi Co. (Pte) LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Mohd Aslam s/o JahandadAppellant Partial (1)	Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)
Long Melvin AnthonyRespondent, Appellant Partial (1)	Respondent, Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)
Mohd Sharif bin IbrahimDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Loh Ah KowAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Monocrafts Pte LtdRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
MFH Marine Pte LtdAppellant, Defendant Won (1)	Appellant, Defendant	1 case	Won (1)