Dew Chambers

Dew Chambers is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2025. The firm has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 5 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and construction law. Their track record shows a 6.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 31.3% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dew Chambers has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	12 cases	46.2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Dew Chambers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 46.2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	7.7% of total caseload	Experienced65.38% relevance score	Dew Chambers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	7.7% of total caseload	General Practice35.00% relevance score	Dew Chambers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Dew Chambers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	Dew Chambers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3.8% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Dew Chambers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Dew Chambers has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3.8% of total caseload	General Practice10.00% relevance score	Dew Chambers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3.8% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Dew Chambers has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3.8% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Dew Chambers has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.8% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Dew Chambers has 5 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 11 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Li-Yen Dew	11 cases	68.8% of firm's cases	2023 sghc 165(Jun 2023) 2022 sghc 203(Aug 2022) 2022 sghc 75(Mar 2022)
Dew Wong	3 cases	18.8% of firm's cases	2025 sghcf 9(Feb 2025)
Low Jianhui	2 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2018 sghcr 1(Mar 2018) 2018 sghc 6(Jan 2018)
Tan Chor Hoon Alice	1 cases	6.3% of firm's cases	2019 sghc 105(Apr 2019)
Low Jian Hui	1 cases	6.3% of firm's cases	2019 sghc 105(Apr 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dew Chambers's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.9
Complex Cases: 5 (31.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	142.9 parties avg	2.9	87.5%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	6.3%
Won	115.0 parties avg	15.0	6.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2022	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2025	115.0 parties avg	15.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dew Chambers's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	14(87.5%)	87.5%
Partial	1(6.3%)	6.3%
Won	1(6.3%)	6.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Partial: 1 cases (4.8%)
2019	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	03 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2022	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Dew Chambers in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Mui Jia JunAppellant, Defendant Partial (1)Lost (1)	Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Partial (1)Lost (1)
WURRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
WUSRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
WUTRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
WUURespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
WUVRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
WUWRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
WUXRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
WUYRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
WUZRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
WVARespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
WVBRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
WVCRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Azuin bin Mohd TapDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Muhammad Hamir B LakaDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Mytsyk, ViktoriiaApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Mohamad Isham Bin IbrahimDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
DaryatiDefense Lost (1)	Defense	1 case	Lost (1)
Kannan s/o R KumaranDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Toh Sia GuanDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Asep ArdiansyahDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Eng Yuen Yee @ Chua Lay Ho (sole executrix of the estate of Chan Poh Choo, deceased)Plaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Maneerat Wongdao Mrs Maneerat NgApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Abd Helmi bin Ab HalimDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ali bin Mohamad BahashwanDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Irwan bin AliDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

Case

2025-sghcf-9

02 Feb 2025

WURWon

WUSWon

WUTWon

WUUWon

WUVWon

WUWWon

WUXWon

WUYWon

WUZWon

WVAWon

WVBWon

WVCWon

Won	WUR (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	WUS (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	WUT (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	WUU (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	WUV (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	WUW (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	WUX (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	WUY (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	WUZ (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	WVA (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	WVB (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
Won	WVC (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.