Public Prosecutor v Tan Kah Ho and Mui Jia Jun: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act

In the High Court of Singapore, Tan Kah Ho and Mui Jia Jun were tried for drug trafficking. Tan was arrested for delivering diamorphine, while Mui was implicated as the supplier and instruction giver. The court found both Tan and Mui guilty of violating the Misuse of Drugs Act, convicting them on charges related to trafficking diamorphine and methamphetamine.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Guilty as charged and convict them accordingly.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Tan Kah Ho and Mui Jia Jun were convicted of drug trafficking. Tan delivered diamorphine, and Mui provided instructions, both violating the Misuse of Drugs Act.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyGuilty as chargedWon
Marcus Foo of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Lau Wing Yum of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Mui Jia JunDefendantIndividualGuilty as chargedLost
Tan Kah HoDefendantIndividualGuilty as chargedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Tan was arrested for delivering diamorphine to Low Johnnie.
  2. Mui was arrested later in connection with the drug delivery.
  3. Tan and Mui were jointly tried for drug trafficking.
  4. Tan admitted to delivering drugs for money.
  5. Mui's DNA was found on the diamorphine bundles.
  6. Tan and Mui were in constant communication before the arrest.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Tan Kah Ho and another, Criminal Case No 1 of 2017, [2017] SGHC 61

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Tan arrested behind City Plaza after delivering diamorphine to Low Johnnie.
Drugs found in Tan's car.
Mui arrested at Wheelock Place car park.
Trial began.
Trial continued.
Trial continued.
Trial continued.
Trial continued.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Drug Trafficking
    • Outcome: The court found both defendants guilty of drug trafficking.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Conviction
  2. Imprisonment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Drug Trafficking

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs ActSingapore
Penal CodeSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Methamphetamine
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Common Intention
  • Courier
  • Misuse of Drugs Act

15.2 Keywords

  • Drug Trafficking
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Diamorphine
  • Methamphetamine

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Offences