DSH Law Corporation

DSH Law Corporation is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2010. The firm has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 3 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in collective sales and strata title law. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

DSH Law Corporation has demonstrated expertise across 6 primary practice areas, with significant experience in collective sales and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Collective Sales	2 cases	25.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	DSH Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 25.0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	25.0% of total caseload	Experienced70.95% relevance score	DSH Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 25.0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	DSH Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	DSH Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	DSH Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	12.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85.00% relevance score	DSH Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 12.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

DSH Law Corporation has 3 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 2 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
David Liew	2 cases	50.0% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 32(Jan 2010) 2009 sghc 114(May 2009)
Liew Tuck Yin David	1 cases	25.0% of firm's cases	2009 sghc 15(Jan 2009)
David Liew Tuck Yin	1 cases	25.0% of firm's cases	2008 sghc 66(May 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of DSH Law Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 15.8
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	416.3 parties avg	16.3	80.0%
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	217.5 parties avg	17.5
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of DSH Law Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80.0%)	80.0%
Dismissed	1(20.0%)	20.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	011 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (9.1%) Lost: 1 cases (9.1%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by DSH Law Corporation in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Liew Chin ChoyDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Neo Bee HongDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Koh Hock ChuanAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
LIM POH HENGAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lim Choo Suan ElizabethAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Peck KhengAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Chan Wai LingDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Chia Sow KinDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Kek BengDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Koh Hong TuanDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Koh Mui InDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Koh Thong GanDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Koh Thong MuiDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Kwok Fong KitDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lam Marn LingDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lee Jee BahDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lee Kam YokeDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Rina Pangastuti AdidharmaDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Khoon EngDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tjeng Hie MinDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tsui WinstonDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Wong Ming WahDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Yeo Mui ChooDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
De Kretser Michael EarnleighDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

Case

2010-sghc-32

27 Jan 2010

Liew Chin ChoyLost

Neo Bee HongDismissed

2009-sghc-114

11 May 2009

Koh Hock ChuanLost

LIM POH HENGLost

Lim Choo Suan ElizabethLost

Tan Peck KhengLost

2009-sghc-15

12 Jan 2009

Chan Wai LingLost

Chia Sow KinLost

Kek BengLost

Koh Hong TuanLost

Koh Mui InLost

Koh Thong GanLost

Koh Thong MuiLost

Kwok Fong KitLost

Lam Marn LingLost

Lee Jee BahLost

Lee Kam YokeLost

Rina Pangastuti AdidharmaLost

Tan Khoon EngLost

Tjeng Hie MinLost

Tsui WinstonLost

Wong Ming WahLost

Yeo Mui ChooLost

Lost	Chan Wai Ling (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Chia Sow Kin (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Kek Beng (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Koh Hong Tuan (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Koh Mui In (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Koh Thong Gan (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Koh Thong Mui (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Kwok Fong Kit (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Lam Marn Ling (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Lee Jee Bah (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Lee Kam Yoke (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Rina Pangastuti Adidharma (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Tan Khoon Eng (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Tjeng Hie Min (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Tsui Winston (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Wong Ming Wah (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
Lost	Yeo Mui Choo (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants' application dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.

2008-sghc-66

07 May 2008

De Kretser Michael EarnleighLost