Lim Choo Suan Elizabeth v Goh Kok Hwa Richard: Collective Sale Approval Appeal

In Lim Choo Suan Elizabeth and Others v Goh Kok Hwa Richard and Others, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal against the Strata Titles Board's decision to approve the collective sale of Rainbow Gardens. The plaintiffs, Lim Choo Suan Elizabeth, Lim Poh Heng, Tan Peck Kheng, and Koh Hock Chuan, raised several legal issues, including non-compliance with the Land Titles (Strata) Act and allegations of bias. Justice Woo Bih Li dismissed the appeal, finding no errors of law in the Board's decision. The court upheld the collective sale order, emphasizing that technical breaches without prejudice should not frustrate the wishes of the majority.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal against Strata Titles Board's approval of Rainbow Gardens' collective sale. The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Board's decision.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Lim Choo Suan ElizabethAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLostDavid Liew
Lim Poh HengAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLostDavid Liew
Tan Peck KhengAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLostDavid Liew
Koh Hock ChuanAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLostDavid Liew
Goh Kok Hwa RichardRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedWonGan Hiang Chye, Edwin Lee, Hazel Tang, Deborah Ho
Soh Liang LiangRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedWonGan Hiang Chye, Edwin Lee, Hazel Tang, Deborah Ho
Lee Choon Kum BeatriceRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedWonGan Hiang Chye, Edwin Lee, Hazel Tang, Deborah Ho

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Woo Bih LiJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
David LiewDSH Law Corporation
Gan Hiang ChyeRajah & Tann LLP
Edwin LeeRajah & Tann LLP
Hazel TangRajah & Tann LLP
Deborah HoRajah & Tann LLP

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiffs appealed against the Strata Titles Board's decision approving the collective sale of Rainbow Gardens.
  2. The plaintiffs alleged non-compliance with s 84A(3) LTSA read with paragraph 1(f) of the Schedule to the LTSA.
  3. The plaintiffs alleged that the CSA was not signed by subsidiary proprietors holding at least 80% of the share value of RG.
  4. The plaintiffs alleged that the transaction was not in good faith having regard to the sale price in the SPA.
  5. The plaintiffs alleged that the President of the RG Board was biased or there was a reasonable suspicion of bias on his part.
  6. The plaintiffs alleged that the President of the RG Board violated the rules of natural justice.
  7. The plaintiffs alleged that the STB erred in law in granting the collective sale order in making wrong findings of facts in the GD.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Lim Choo Suan Elizabeth and Others v Goh Kok Hwa Richard and Others, OS 664/2008, [2009] SGHC 114

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Application made for collective sale order of Rainbow Gardens
Minority filed objections to the application
First mediation session held
Second mediation session held
Majority filed an interlocutory application
Minority filed an interlocutory application to strike out the application
Hearing of the two interlocutory applications commenced
RG Board dismissed both interlocutory applications with costs
Hearing of the application proceeded
Hearing of the application proceeded
Hearing of the application proceeded
Hearing of the application proceeded
Hearing of the application proceeded
Hearing of the application proceeded
Minority filed appeal to the High Court
Board granted an order for the collective sale of Rainbow Gardens
High Court dismissed the appeal

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Natural Justice
    • Outcome: The court found that the President of the Strata Titles Board was not biased and had not predetermined the Application.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Excessive interruptions during hearing
      • Remarks made by President of Strata Titles Board during hearing
      • Failure to subpoena witness
  2. Compliance with Land Titles (Strata) Act
    • Outcome: The court found that there was non-compliance with s 84A(3) LTSA read with paragraph 1(f) of the Schedule to the LTSA but that the breach did not cause prejudice.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Validity of Collective Sale Agreement
    • Outcome: The court found that the collective sale agreement was signed by the requisite majority in share value.
    • Category: Substantive
  4. Good Faith in Transaction
    • Outcome: The court found that the transaction was in good faith and that the sale price was obtained at arm's length.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Setting aside the order for collective sale

9. Cause of Actions

  • Appeal against decision of Strata Titles Board

10. Practice Areas

  • Real Estate Law
  • Strata Title Law
  • Property Law
  • Civil Litigation

11. Industries

  • Real Estate
  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Siow Doreen v Lo Pui SangHigh CourtYes[2008] 1 SLR 213SingaporeCited for the principle that an STB has the power to allow an application for a collective sale order to be amended.
Ng Swee Lang v Sassoon Samuel BernardHigh CourtYes[2008] 1 SLR 522SingaporeCited for the principle that procedural requirements in the LTSA are not absolute obstacles and that a technical breach of the LTSA which causes no prejudice should not be allowed to frustrate the wishes of a majority who wish to obtain a collective sale order.
Ng Swee Lang v Sassoon Samuel BernardCourt of AppealYes[2008] 2 SLR 597SingaporeCited for the principle that the modern approach is to consider whether it is the intention of Parliament to invalidate any act done in breach of a statutory provision and that a technical objection that has not caused any prejudice to the minority owners should not prevail.
Tan Siew Tian v Lee Khek Ern KenHigh CourtYes[2008] 3 SLR 64SingaporeCited regarding the requirement of obtaining the consent of SPs, holding at least 80% of the share values, to a collective sale agreement before an application to an STB could be made.
Tan Siew Tian v Lee Khek Ern KenCourt of AppealYes[2008] 3 SLR 941SingaporeCited regarding the requirement of obtaining the consent of SPs, holding at least 80% of the share values, to a collective sale agreement before an application to an STB could be made.
Chang Mei Wah Selena v Wiener Robert LorenzHigh CourtYes[2008] 4 SLR 385SingaporeCited for the principle that a technical breach will not invalidate an application to an STB if there is no prejudice to anyone.
Liu Chee Ming v Loo-Lim ShirleyHigh CourtYes[2008] 2 SLR 764SingaporeCited regarding the complaint about a breach of the collective sale agreement from the angle that such a breach established an absence of good faith.
Ng Eng Ghee and others v Mamata Kapildev Dave and Others (Horizon Partners Pte Ltd, intervener)Court of AppealYes[2009] SGCA 14SingaporeCited for the principle that the sale committee has a duty to obtain an independent valuation prior to settling on the final sale price.
Mohammad Ali bin Johari v PPCourt of AppealYes[2008] 4 SLR 1058SingaporeCited for the principles applicable to judicial interference in the examination and cross-examination of witnesses.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Land Titles (Strata) Act (Cap 158, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore
Section 84A Land Titles (Strata) ActSingapore
Section 84A(3) Land Titles (Strata) ActSingapore
Section 84B(1)(b) Land Titles (Strata) ActSingapore
Section 84(11) Land Titles (Strata) ActSingapore
Schedule Land Titles (Strata) ActSingapore
Schedule para 1(f) Land Titles (Strata) ActSingapore
Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act 2004Singapore
Section 98(1) Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act 2004Singapore
Section 89 Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act 2004Singapore
Section 90 Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act 2004Singapore
Section 3 Land Titles (Strata) ActSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Collective sale
  • Strata Titles Board
  • Land Titles (Strata) Act
  • Subsidiary proprietors
  • Share value
  • Good faith
  • Valuation report
  • Minimum selling price
  • Collective sale agreement
  • Sale and purchase agreement

15.2 Keywords

  • Collective sale
  • Strata titles
  • Land Titles Act
  • Singapore
  • Real estate
  • Property law
  • En bloc sale

16. Subjects

  • Real Property Law
  • Strata Title Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Administrative Law

17. Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law
  • Land Law
  • Strata Titles
  • Collective Sales