Guna & Associates
Guna & Associates is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2021. The firm has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 2 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in family law and divorce. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.
Areas of Practice and Expertise
Guna & Associates has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and property law.
Practice Area | Case Volume |
---|---|
Family Law | 4 cases |
Property Law | 3 cases |
Divorce | 3 cases |
Wills and Probate | 3 cases |
Civil Practice | 3 cases |
Contracts | 2 cases |
Criminal Law | 2 cases |
Proprietary Estoppel | 2 cases |
Real Estate | 2 cases |
CPF Nomination | 1 cases |
Legal Team and Representation
Guna & Associates has 2 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 9 cases.
Counsel Name | Cases Handled |
---|---|
K Mathialahan | 9 cases |
Kamalam d/o S V Suppiah | 1 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Guna & Associates's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.3
- Complex Cases
- 2 (20%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 52.6 parties avg |
Lost | 34.4 parties avg |
Partial | 22.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2002 | 12.0 parties avg |
2009 | 14.0 parties avg |
2010 | 12.0 parties avg |
2012 | 12.0 parties avg |
2013 | 12.0 parties avg |
2014 | 22.5 parties avg |
2018 | 16.0 parties avg |
2020 | 12.0 parties avg |
2021 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Guna & Associates's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 5(50.0%) |
Lost | 3(30.0%) |
Partial | 2(20.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 81520.005 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2002 | 01 1 |
2009 | 01 1 |
2010 | 01 1 |
2012 | 01 1 |
2013 | 01 1 |
2014 | 02 2 |
2018 | 01 1 |
2020 | 01 1 |
2021 | 01 1 |
Represented Parties
List of parties represented by Guna & Associates in various cases
Party Name | Cases |
---|---|
Maha Devi d/o Palanisamy Nadasan (the administrator of the estate of Devi d/o N Gurusamy, deceased)Respondent, Defendant Won (1) | 1 case |
Maha Devi d/o Palanisamy Nadasan (administrator of the estate of Devi d/o Gurusamy, deceased)Defendant Won (1) | 1 case |
Carissa Poh Hui MinRespondent Lost (1) | 1 case |
Jonathan Poh Jun HuiRespondent Lost (1) | 1 case |
Poh Peng GheeRespondent Lost (1) | 1 case |
Yam Hui Min, Barbara RebeccaRespondent Won (1) | 1 case |
Geyabalan s/o K RamiahAppellant Won (1) | 1 case |
BHMDefendant Partial (1) | 1 case |
Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan (now known as K Saseedaran Nair)Appellant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Saseedaran Nair s/o KrishnanRespondent, Defendant Partial (1) | 1 case |
Mohamed Nizam s/o Mohamed IsmailPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
Amir Hamzah Bin Berang KutyAppellant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Case History
Displaying all 10 cases
Case |
---|
26 Jan 2021 Maha Devi d/o Palanisamy Nadasan (the administrator of the estate of Devi d/o N Gurusamy, deceased)Won |
28 Jun 2020 Maha Devi d/o Palanisamy Nadasan (administrator of the estate of Devi d/o Gurusamy, deceased)Won |
27 Sep 2018 Carissa Poh Hui MinLost Jonathan Poh Jun HuiLost Poh Peng GheeLost |
23 Oct 2014 Yam Hui Min, Barbara RebeccaWon |
03 Sep 2014 Geyabalan s/o K RamiahWon |
28 Apr 2013 BHMPartial |
15 Jan 2012 Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan (now known as K Saseedaran Nair)Lost |
28 Mar 2010 Saseedaran Nair s/o KrishnanPartial |
09 Jul 2009 Mohamed Nizam s/o Mohamed IsmailWon |
13 Dec 2002 Amir Hamzah Bin Berang KutyLost |