Haq and Selvam

Haq and Selvam is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2009. The firm has handled 19 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in mareva injunctions and admiralty and maritime law. Their track record shows a 42.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 26.3% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Haq and Selvam has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	6 cases	12.0% of total caseload	Experienced71.50% relevance score	Haq and Selvam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12.0% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	10.0% of total caseload	Experienced62.73% relevance score	Haq and Selvam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10.0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	10.0% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Haq and Selvam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10.0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	3 cases	6.0% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Haq and Selvam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6.0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	3 cases	6.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Haq and Selvam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6.0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	3 cases	6.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82.50% relevance score	Haq and Selvam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6.0% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	3 cases	6.0% of total caseload	Experienced71.25% relevance score	Haq and Selvam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6.0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	4.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86.67% relevance score	Haq and Selvam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.0% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	2 cases	4.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Haq and Selvam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	4.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Haq and Selvam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Haq and Selvam has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 8 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Oommen Mathew	8 cases	42.1% of firm's cases	2009 sgca 45(Sep 2009) 2006 sghc 16(Jan 2006) 2006 sghc 4(Jan 2006)
Michael Lai	6 cases	31.6% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 228(Dec 2005) 2005 sghc 161(Sep 2005)
Wendy Tan	5 cases	26.3% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 161(Sep 2005) 2005 sgca 6(Jan 2005)
Rajmohan	1 cases	5.3% of firm's cases	2005 sgca 47(Oct 2005)
Anjali Iyer	1 cases	5.3% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 57(Mar 2005)
Oommen Matthew	1 cases	5.3% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 170(Sep 2005)
Wendy Tan Poh Ling	1 cases	5.3% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 98(May 2005)
Genevieve Chia	1 cases	5.3% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 43(Feb 2005)
Ow Kim Kiat	1 cases	5.3% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 174(Aug 2004)
Anand Su Yin	1 cases	5.3% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 98(May 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Haq and Selvam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 5 (26.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	83.1 parties avg	3.1	42.1%
Lost	62.1 parties avg	2.1	31.6%
Partial	48.2 parties avg	8.2	21.1%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	37.6 parties avg	7.6
2005	103.1 parties avg	3.1
2006	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Haq and Selvam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	8(42.1%)	42.1%
Lost	6(31.6%)	31.6%
Partial	4(21.1%)	21.1%
Neutral	1(5.3%)	5.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	37668133.72	2215772.5710 cases	10

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	03 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2004	012 12	Lost: 1 cases (8.3%) Partial: 2 cases (16.7%)
2005	0415 415	Lost: 4 cases (1.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (0.2%) Won: 5 cases (1.2%)
2006	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2009	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Haq and Selvam in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Pertamina Energy Trading LtdPlaintiff, Respondent, Defendant Lost (1)Won (2)	Plaintiff, Respondent, Defendant	3 cases	Lost (1)Won (2)
Pertamina Energy Services Pte LtdRespondent, Defendant Won (2)	Respondent, Defendant	2 cases	Won (2)
Acclaim Insurance Brokers Pte LtdRespondent Partial (1)	Respondent	1 case	Partial (1)
ECRC Land Pte Ltd (in liquidation)Respondent Partial (1)	Respondent	1 case	Partial (1)
Chen Lip KeongDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Management Corporation Strata Title Plan Nos 1298 and 1304Appellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Petrosin Corp Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Dalian Hualiang Enterprise Group Co LtdPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Dalian Jinshi Oil-Making Co LtdPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Infocommcentre Pte LtdDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Otech Pakistan Pvt LtdPlaintiff Neutral (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Neutral (1)
Neocorp International LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
OthersRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Good Stream Co LtdDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Sun Fook Kong Construction Ltd (formerly known as Sung Foo Kee, Ltd)Plaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Lim Ah PohPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Yeo Boong HuaPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Pan-United Shipyard Pte LtdRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Castle Shipping Company LimitedDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Hailisen Shipping Co LtdInterveners Won (1)	Interveners	1 case	Won (1)
QBE Insurance (Malaysia) BhdDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)