M Pillay

M Pillay is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2018. The firm has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 4 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and banking and finance. They have managed 1 complex cases, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

M Pillay has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	11.1% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	M Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	11.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	M Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	11.1% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	M Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	11.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	M Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	11.1% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	M Pillay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11.1% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	M Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	11.1% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	M Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	11.1% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	M Pillay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	11.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	M Pillay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

M Pillay has 4 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 2 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Yeo Boon Tat	2 cases	66.7% of firm's cases	2018 sghc 51(Mar 2018) 2010 sghc 263(Aug 2010)
Christopher Chong	1 cases	33.3% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 50(Feb 2010)
Mohan Pillay	1 cases	33.3% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 263(Aug 2010)
Jasmine Kok	1 cases	33.3% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 50(Feb 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of M Pillay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	66.7%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of M Pillay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2018	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by M Pillay in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
TAKENAKA CORPORATIONApplicant, Respondent Lost (1)	Applicant, Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Law Society of SingaporeDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Lam Chi Kin DavidPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

Case

2018-sghc-51

06 Mar 2018

TAKENAKA CORPORATIONLost

2010-sghc-263

30 Aug 2010

Law Society of SingaporePartial

2010-sghc-50

09 Feb 2010

Lam Chi Kin DavidLost