M Rama Law Corporation

M Rama Law Corporation is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2015. The firm has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and negligence. Their track record shows a 30.8% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 23.1% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

M Rama Law Corporation has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and automobile accidents.

Practice AreaCase Volume
Personal Injury8 cases
Automobile Accidents5 cases
Negligence5 cases
Construction Law3 cases
Insurance Bad Faith2 cases
Property Law2 cases
Torts2 cases
Wills and Probate2 cases
Premises Liability1 cases
Property Damage1 cases

Legal Team and Representation

M Rama Law Corporation has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 6 cases.

Counsel NameCases Handled
Nagaraja S Maniam6 cases
N K Rajarh4 cases
M Ramasamy4 cases
Shelley Lim2 cases
NK Rajarh1 cases
Ramesh s/o Varathappan1 cases
Shirley Lim1 cases
Shelley Lim Lei-Yee1 cases
Gokul Haridas1 cases
Shelly Lim Lei-Yee1 cases

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of M Rama Law Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.9
Complex Cases
3 (23.1%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost53.0 parties avg
Won43.3 parties avg
Partial32.0 parties avg
Unknown13.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201142.5 parties avg
201223.7 parties avg
201323.6 parties avg
201432.3 parties avg
201522.9 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of M Rama Law Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost5(38.5%)
Won4(30.8%)
Partial3(23.1%)
Unknown1(7.7%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD54810.388 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20110121
121
2012011
11
2013011
11
20140111
111
2015011
11

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by M Rama Law Corporation in various cases

Party NameCases
Teo Gim TiongAppellant, Defendant, Appellant
Won (1)Lost (1)
2 cases
Ho Ah Lam Ferrocement (Pte) LtdRespondent, Defendant
Won (2)
2 cases
Leow Li YoonAppellant
Won (1)
1 case
P & K Services Pte LtdPlaintiff
Lost (1)
1 case
Union Concept Manufacturers Pte LtdPlaintiff
Lost (1)
1 case
Teacly (S) Pte LtdDefendant, Appellant
Partial (1)
1 case
Ong Chee Yi, AndyDefendant
Lost (1)
1 case
Lal Offshore Marine Pte LtdRespondent
Won (1)
1 case
Sher Kuan HockDefendant, Respondent
Lost (1)
1 case
Lonpac Insurance BhdPlaintiff, Appellant
Partial (1)
1 case
Liberty Insurance Pte LtdDefendant
Partial (1)
1 case
OthersDefendant
Lost (1)
1 case
Bar None (S) Pte LtdDefendant
1 case

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

Case
03 Nov 2015
Leow Li YoonWon
03 May 2015
P & K Services Pte LtdLost
Union Concept Manufacturers Pte LtdLost
05 Nov 2014
Teacly (S) Pte LtdPartial
04 Aug 2014
Ong Chee Yi, AndyLost
23 Jul 2014
Teo Gim TiongWon
16 Sep 2013
Teo Gim TiongLost
23 Apr 2013
Ho Ah Lam Ferrocement (Pte) LtdWon
Lal Offshore Marine Pte LtdWon
07 May 2012
Sher Kuan HockLost
22 Apr 2012
Ho Ah Lam Ferrocement (Pte) LtdWon
29 Nov 2011
Lonpac Insurance BhdPartial
23 Jun 2011
Liberty Insurance Pte LtdPartial
30 Mar 2011
OthersLost
02 Mar 2011
Bar None (S) Pte Ltd