M Rama Law Corporation
M Rama Law Corporation is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2015. The firm has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and negligence. Their track record shows a 30.8% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 23.1% of their total caseload.
Areas of Practice and Expertise
M Rama Law Corporation has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and automobile accidents.
Practice Area | Case Volume |
---|---|
Personal Injury | 8 cases |
Automobile Accidents | 5 cases |
Negligence | 5 cases |
Construction Law | 3 cases |
Insurance Bad Faith | 2 cases |
Property Law | 2 cases |
Torts | 2 cases |
Wills and Probate | 2 cases |
Premises Liability | 1 cases |
Property Damage | 1 cases |
Legal Team and Representation
M Rama Law Corporation has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 6 cases.
Counsel Name | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Nagaraja S Maniam | 6 cases |
N K Rajarh | 4 cases |
M Ramasamy | 4 cases |
Shelley Lim | 2 cases |
NK Rajarh | 1 cases |
Ramesh s/o Varathappan | 1 cases |
Shirley Lim | 1 cases |
Shelley Lim Lei-Yee | 1 cases |
Gokul Haridas | 1 cases |
Shelly Lim Lei-Yee | 1 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of M Rama Law Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.9
- Complex Cases
- 3 (23.1%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 53.0 parties avg |
Won | 43.3 parties avg |
Partial | 32.0 parties avg |
Unknown | 13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2011 | 42.5 parties avg |
2012 | 23.7 parties avg |
2013 | 23.6 parties avg |
2014 | 32.3 parties avg |
2015 | 22.9 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of M Rama Law Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 5(38.5%) |
Won | 4(30.8%) |
Partial | 3(23.1%) |
Unknown | 1(7.7%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 54810.388 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2011 | 0121 121 |
2012 | 011 11 |
2013 | 011 11 |
2014 | 0111 111 |
2015 | 011 11 |
Represented Parties
List of parties represented by M Rama Law Corporation in various cases
Party Name | Cases |
---|---|
Teo Gim TiongAppellant, Defendant, Appellant Won (1)Lost (1) | 2 cases |
Ho Ah Lam Ferrocement (Pte) LtdRespondent, Defendant Won (2) | 2 cases |
Leow Li YoonAppellant Won (1) | 1 case |
P & K Services Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1) | 1 case |
Union Concept Manufacturers Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1) | 1 case |
Teacly (S) Pte LtdDefendant, Appellant Partial (1) | 1 case |
Ong Chee Yi, AndyDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Lal Offshore Marine Pte LtdRespondent Won (1) | 1 case |
Sher Kuan HockDefendant, Respondent Lost (1) | 1 case |
Lonpac Insurance BhdPlaintiff, Appellant Partial (1) | 1 case |
Liberty Insurance Pte LtdDefendant Partial (1) | 1 case |
OthersDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Bar None (S) Pte LtdDefendant | 1 case |
Case History
Displaying all 13 cases
Case |
---|
03 Nov 2015 Leow Li YoonWon |
03 May 2015 P & K Services Pte LtdLost Union Concept Manufacturers Pte LtdLost |
05 Nov 2014 Teacly (S) Pte LtdPartial |
04 Aug 2014 Ong Chee Yi, AndyLost |
23 Jul 2014 Teo Gim TiongWon |
16 Sep 2013 Teo Gim TiongLost |
23 Apr 2013 Ho Ah Lam Ferrocement (Pte) LtdWon Lal Offshore Marine Pte LtdWon |
07 May 2012 Sher Kuan HockLost |
22 Apr 2012 Ho Ah Lam Ferrocement (Pte) LtdWon |
29 Nov 2011 Lonpac Insurance BhdPartial |
23 Jun 2011 Liberty Insurance Pte LtdPartial |
30 Mar 2011 OthersLost |
02 Mar 2011 Bar None (S) Pte Ltd |