Tan Teck Boon v Lee Gim Siong: Damages Assessment for Road Accident Injuries and Loss of Earnings

In Tan Teck Boon v Lee Gim Siong and others, the Singapore High Court assessed damages for the plaintiff, Tan Teck Boon, who sustained injuries in a road accident caused by the negligence of the first defendant, Lee Gim Siong, and the second and third defendants. Interlocutory judgment was entered for the plaintiff by consent, with damages to be assessed at 90% against the first defendant and 10% against the second and third defendants. The court awarded damages for medical expenses, transport expenses, loss of earnings, pain and suffering, and loss of earning capacity.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for the Plaintiff

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

High Court assesses damages for Tan Teck Boon's injuries and loss of earnings after a car accident caused by Lee Gim Siong's negligence.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
OthersDefendantCorporationDamages assessed at 10%Lost
Tan Teck BoonPlaintiffIndividualJudgment for the PlaintiffWon
Lee Gim SiongDefendantIndividualDamages assessed at 90%Lost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Eunice ChuaAssistant RegistrarYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The first defendant's car collided with the plaintiff's car.
  2. The second defendant's lorry collided with the rear of the plaintiff's car.
  3. The plaintiff sustained fractures to his right thigh bone, right forearm, and left wrist.
  4. The plaintiff underwent multiple surgeries due to complications with the healing of his right femur.
  5. The plaintiff was a sole proprietor of a courier business.
  6. The plaintiff had to subcontract his courier assignments due to his injuries.
  7. The plaintiff's right leg was shortened by 1 cm.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Tan Teck Boon v Lee Gim Siong and others, Suit No 563 of 2009 (Notice of Appointment for Assessment No 69 of 2010), [2011] SGHC 76

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Car accident occurred
Plaintiff discharged from hospital
Plaintiff underwent surgery for revision of fixation and bone grafting
Plaintiff underwent further surgery for revision of fixation and bone grafting
Interlocutory judgment entered for the plaintiff
End of Plaintiff's hospitalisation leave
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury
    • Outcome: The court assessed damages for pain and suffering, medical expenses, loss of earnings, and loss of earning capacity.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Pain and Suffering
      • Medical Expenses
      • Loss of Earnings
      • Loss of Earning Capacity
      • Nursing and Care Costs
    • Related Cases:
      • Loh Chee Wang v Ong Leong Chye, DC Suit No. 4300 of 2003
      • Chiam Kim Loke v Lee Wing Hoong [2004] SGHC 37
      • Lim Juat Teng v Tan Hong Cheng, DC Suit No. 3711 of 2003
      • Donnelly v Joyce [1974] QB 454
      • Lee Wei Kong v Ng Siok Tong [2010] SGHC 371
      • TV Media Pte Ltd v De Cruz Andrea Heidi [2004] 3 SLR(R) 543
      • Chai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda Gillian [2010] 3 SLR 587
      • Ho Yiu v Lim Peng Seng [2004] 4 SLR(R) 675
      • Chang Ah Lek v Lim Ah Koon [1998] 3 SLR(R) 551
      • Lee Chou Ming v Chua Kok Chai, Suit No. 1320 of 2001
      • Wong Kim Lan v Christie Kolandasamy [2004] SGDC 234
      • Koh Soon Pheng v Tan Kah Eng [2003] 2 SLR(R) 538
  2. Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found the first defendant negligent, leading to the plaintiff's injuries.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury Litigation

11. Industries

  • Transportation
  • Logistics

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Loh Chee Wang v Ong Leong ChyeDistrict CourtYesLoh Chee Wang v Ong Leong Chye, DC Suit No. 4300 of 2003SingaporeCompared the award for a fractured femur with shortening, noting the plaintiff in the cited case had a less complicated recovery.
Chiam Kim Loke v Lee Wing HoongHigh CourtYesChiam Kim Loke v Lee Wing Hoong [2004] SGHC 37SingaporeCompared the award for a severe comminuted fracture of the femur with significant shortening and deformity.
Lim Juat Teng v Tan Hong ChengDistrict CourtYesLim Juat Teng v Tan Hong Cheng, DC Suit No. 3711 of 2003SingaporeAuthority for the award amount for a closed fracture of the ulna.
Donnelly v JoyceQueen's BenchYesDonnelly v Joyce [1974] QB 454England and WalesCited for the principle that a court can award special damages for the value of services rendered by a parental caregiver calculated with reference to his or her lost wages.
Lee Wei Kong v Ng Siok TongHigh CourtYesLee Wei Kong v Ng Siok Tong [2010] SGHC 371SingaporeCited for the principle that an award may be made under the head of nursing and care based on the cost of employing a maid or a nurse.
TV Media Pte Ltd v De Cruz Andrea HeidiCourt of AppealYesTV Media Pte Ltd v De Cruz Andrea Heidi [2004] 3 SLR(R) 543SingaporeDistinguished from the present case as the plaintiff in the cited case required continuous medication for her entire life, whereas the plaintiff in the present case only required intermittent pain medication.
Chai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda GillianCourt of AppealYesChai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda Gillian [2010] 3 SLR 587SingaporeCited for the principle that the assessment of a claimant’s loss of earnings did not depend on comparing the claimant’s yearly average income before and after the accident but rather on restoring the claimant to the position that he or she would have been (in a monetary sense) had the accident not happened.
Ho Yiu v Lim Peng SengCourt of AppealYesHo Yiu v Lim Peng Seng [2004] 4 SLR(R) 675SingaporeCited for the multiplier used for plaintiffs who were 33 at the date of the assessment of damages.
Chang Ah Lek v Lim Ah KoonCourt of AppealYesChang Ah Lek v Lim Ah Koon [1998] 3 SLR(R) 551SingaporeCited for the multiplier used for plaintiffs who were 31 at the date of the assessment of damages.
Lee Chou Ming v Chua Kok ChaiHigh CourtYesLee Chou Ming v Chua Kok Chai, Suit No. 1320 of 2001SingaporeDistinguished from the present case as the grounds of the High Court were not published in this case; hence, the reason for awarding the claimant damages based on a loss of earning capacity rather than a loss of future earnings is unclear.
Wong Kim Lan v Christie KolandasamyDistrict CourtYesWong Kim Lan v Christie Kolandasamy [2004] SGDC 234SingaporeDistinguished from the present case as the plaintiff's injury post-accident resulted in him being completely unable to personally carry out courier assignments.
Koh Soon Pheng v Tan Kah EngHigh CourtYesKoh Soon Pheng v Tan Kah Eng [2003] 2 SLR(R) 538SingaporeDistinguished from the present case as the loss of earnings of the claimant was based on his loss of business income; this fluctuated from year to year. The Court therefore encountered difficulty in fixing a multiplier.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Damages Assessment
  • Personal Injury
  • Loss of Earnings
  • Loss of Earning Capacity
  • Medical Expenses
  • Pain and Suffering
  • Courier Business
  • Subcontractor
  • Fracture
  • Osteoarthritis

15.2 Keywords

  • car accident
  • personal injury
  • damages
  • loss of earnings
  • medical expenses
  • negligence

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Personal Injury
  • Damages
  • Road Accident